From christian.meunier at magelo.com Thu Jan 2 06:02:16 2014 From: christian.meunier at magelo.com (Christian Meunier) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:02:16 +0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] How to update system to a specific release version ? Message-ID: <52C500E8.6090306@magelo.com> Hi all and happy new year ! I currently have a server on r151004 and I would like to update it to the r151006 which is now one release behind the latest one (r151008). The upgrade instructions ( http://omnios.omniti.com/wiki.php/Upgrade_r151004_r151006 ) does not specify a version and would currently try to update my system straight to r151008. I searched the wiki and couldn't find a pointer on how to upgrade to a specific version which is pretty important given that you can upgrade to the r151008 only from the r151006 so you have to iteratively upgrade your system... Thanks in advance for your help. -- Chris From richard.palo at free.fr Thu Jan 2 22:38:52 2014 From: richard.palo at free.fr (Richard PALO) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:38:52 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] #83 libgmp problems in 151008 Message-ID: hi, is there any idea of when/if an update might land fixing https://src.omniti.com/omnios-private/ticket.php/83 thanks in advance From henson at acm.org Sat Jan 4 00:59:04 2014 From: henson at acm.org (Paul B. Henson) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:59:04 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] disable NetBIOS-Over-TCP for smb server Message-ID: <20140104005904.GL7372@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> Is there any way to disable netbios for the in-kernel smb server? Per the man page: The smbd daemon is automatically invoked by using the sharemgr command over all available transports. By default, smbd starts over the NetBIOS-Over-TCP (NBT) and TCP tran- sports. When smbd is started over NBT, the following services are started: o The NetBIOS name service is started on UDP port 137. o The NetBIOS datagram service is started on UDP port 138. o The NetBIOS session service is started on TCP port 139. When the smbd daemon is started over TCP, the CIFS service is started on TCP port 445. If this is the "default", it kinda implies you could change it, but I haven't been able to figure out how. I don't really want to run NetBIOS, I just want to listen on port 445. Thanks... From matthias-omn-discuss at mteege.de Sun Jan 5 13:17:55 2014 From: matthias-omn-discuss at mteege.de (Matthias Teege) Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:17:55 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] r151008 ipkg zone attach problems In-Reply-To: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: Hi, > I noticed that I could not attach my non-global zones under r151008 > after upgrading from r151006. I made a couple VMs to reproduce, and it I run in the same issue. Can I attach the r151006 zones without "-u" and update later? Many Thanks Matthias From gordon.w.ross at gmail.com Sat Jan 4 05:30:51 2014 From: gordon.w.ross at gmail.com (Gordon Ross) Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 00:30:51 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [discuss] disable NetBIOS-Over-TCP for smb server In-Reply-To: <20140104005904.GL7372@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> References: <20140104005904.GL7372@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> Message-ID: At the moment, no, there's no way to disable the NetBIOS listener. We have a "knob" for that in updated SMB server code we're developing for NexentaStor, so once that makes its way to illumos you'll have it. On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: > Is there any way to disable netbios for the in-kernel smb server? Per > the man page: > > The smbd daemon is automatically invoked by using the > sharemgr command over all available transports. By default, > smbd starts over the NetBIOS-Over-TCP (NBT) and TCP tran- > sports. > > When smbd is started over NBT, the following services are > started: > > o The NetBIOS name service is started on UDP port > 137. > > o The NetBIOS datagram service is started on UDP port > 138. > > o The NetBIOS session service is started on TCP port > 139. > > When the smbd daemon is started over TCP, the CIFS service > is started on TCP port 445. > > If this is the "default", it kinda implies you could change it, but I > haven't been able to figure out how. I don't really want to run NetBIOS, > I just want to listen on port 445. > > Thanks... > > > > ------------------------------------------- > illumos-discuss > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175550-721fcbaf > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175550&id_secret=21175550-eae52450 > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com -- Gordon Ross Nexenta Systems, Inc. www.nexenta.com Enterprise class storage for everyone From daleg at omniti.com Mon Jan 6 15:49:56 2014 From: daleg at omniti.com (Dale Ghent) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:49:56 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] r151008 ipkg zone attach problems In-Reply-To: <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> References: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> Message-ID: <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> There's a fix out now for this, released on friday. New packages for: package/pkg system/zones/brand/ipkg Update these before you do your zone-related work and it should work as expected. /dale On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Matthias Teege wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > > Hi, > >> I noticed that I could not attach my non-global zones under r151008 >> after upgrading from r151006. I made a couple VMs to reproduce, and it > > I run in the same issue. Can I attach the r151006 zones without "-u" > and update later? > > Many Thanks > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From ngoossens at gmail.com Mon Jan 6 22:50:18 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:50:18 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: All, Short introduction: I'm a non-professional user running a home lab (actually in a Sun 900 rack, but that's a different story). One of my machines is a Supermicro X9SCL-F motherboard with a Xeon 1230v2 running the latest OmniOS release, r151008 - 6de5e81. The reason I chose OmniOS is because it allows me to have one machine act as FC target and KVM host simultaneously. In my home lab, where the electricity bill is always an issue, this is a good thing. I'm running Cloudstack in my home lab divided over three machines: two Supermicro X9SCL-F boards with Xeon 1230v2 act as compute hosts (running a basic Ubuntu 13.10 with KVM because Cloudstack needs libvirt for controlling the hosts), and one machine acts as Cloudstack controller. This is the OmniOS machine and it runs a few VMs (mysql, bind, Cloudstack-management, alfresco, plex). The machine itself has 32gb ram, 5x1tb drives on the motherboard sata controller (in raidz1). Boot drive is a dedicated 320gb sata drive on the same onboard sata controller. Two PCIe cards are connected: one QLogic 2460 FC card, and one IBM branded Intel PRO/1000 PT dual port. My OmniOS host experiences random freezes. These appear out of nowhere. I will list the steps I've taken to isolate the issue so far. 1. Is the system under load when the freeze occurs? A. No. I've let the machine run idle the past few days, and it will freeze anyway. 2. Is there anything in /var/adm/messages? A. Not anymore. There used to be though: I've seen the following: Jan 4 20:40:16 controller mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: e1000g2 registered Jan 4 20:40:19 controller mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: e1000g2 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jan 4 20:49:30 controller mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: e1000g2 link down Jan 4 20:49:30 controller in.routed[1382]: [ID 238047 daemon.warning] interface e1000g2 to 10.10.3.8 turned off I've disabled e1000g2 (simply ifconfig e1000g2 down and the warnings have disappeared - this leads me to suspect the Intel NIC though) I've also seen lots of these entries in /var/adm/messages: Jan 5 11:08:21 controller ahci: [ID 117845 kern.warning] WARNING: satapkt 0xffffff0935ec3900: cmd_reg = 0xb0 features_reg = 0x0 sec_count_msb = 0x0 lba_low_msb = 0x4f lba_mid_msb = 0x4f lba_high_msb = 0x0 sec_count_lsb = 0x0 lba_low_lsb = 0x0 lba_mid_lsb = 0x4f lba_high_lsb = 0xc2 device_reg = 0x0 addr_type = 0x4 cmd_flags = 0x12 There was an additional PCIe sata card in this machine, which I have removed. The warnings went away. 3. Is the pool healthy? A. The drives are consumer grade sata drives and about 3 years old. They are not really used that much - they used to be in my Opensolaris based NAS before I upgraded that to something bigger. Smartctl tells me SMART status of all drives is OK. There are no other log entries that lead me to believe a drive is bad. Zpool status is OK. 4. Is there anything in Supermicro IPMI? A. The following, which has occurred only twice now: 2013/11/23 19:53:28 Correctable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted 2013/11/23 19:53:29 Uncorrectable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted 2013/11/23 22:28:56 Correctable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted 2013/11/23 22:28:57 Uncorrectable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted Even though I'd rather not see this error, I'm not alarmed considering it has not occurred since. 5. Are core dump or crash files available? A. I've setup dumpadm and coreadm only today. There are no core files in /, or crash files in /var/crash. There are no log entries in /var/log. There is nothing in /var/adm/messages, the last entry there is hours before the machine freezes. Now I am not a full blown sysadmin but I do have some experience with Solaris, so I know my way around a little bit. I start to feel stuck however, I need help in further isolating this issue. Therefore any help is seriously appreciated! Thanks for any advice and kind regards, Niels Goossens -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Mon Jan 6 23:32:54 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:32:54 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52CB3D26.8090407@gmail.com> On 1/6/14, 10:50 PM, Niels Goossens wrote: > 3. Is the pool healthy? > A. The drives are consumer grade sata drives and about 3 years old. They > are not really used that much - they used to be in my Opensolaris based > NAS before I upgraded that to something bigger. Smartctl tells me SMART > status of all drives is OK. There are no other log entries that lead me > to believe a drive is bad. Zpool status is OK. Just to perform a test, you could try loading up the pool with as much test data as you can (some repetitive incompressible test pattern would be best, e.g. a movie file) and then run "zpool scrub" to verify all the checksums. > 4. Is there anything in Supermicro IPMI? > A. The following, which has occurred only twice now: > > 2013/11/23 19:53:28Correctable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted > 2013/11/23 19:53:29Uncorrectable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted > 2013/11/23 22:28:56Correctable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted > 2013/11/23 22:28:57Uncorrectable Memory ECC @ DIMM2A(CPU1) - Asserted > > Even though I'd rather not see this error, I'm not alarmed considering > it has not occurred since. This could indicate degrading or failing ECC memory. Try running memtest86+ on the machine for a while to see if it reports anything useful. You can grab a pre-built ISO at http://www.memtest.org/#downiso Alternatively, grab a bootable file from that site. Then, just put it somewhere on your root filesystem, e.g. /platform/i86pc/memtest86+-4.20.bin, gunzip and boot to it from GRUB by entering the following GRUB commands: findroot (pool_rpool,0,a) <- partition number + slice bootfs rpool/ROOT/omnios <- see "beadm list" for the exact name kernel /platform/i86pc/memtest86+-4.20.bin boot > 5. Are core dump or crash files available? > A. I've setup dumpadm and coreadm only today. There are no core files in > /, or crash files in /var/crash. There are no log entries in /var/log. > There is nothing in /var/adm/messages, the last entry there is hours > before the machine freezes. System crash dumps are usually saved on the dump device (rpool/dump) until you manually retrieve them. If you run "savecore" without any arguments it will try to extract the crash dump from the dump device and save it to /var/crash/. Cheers, -- Saso From Rob at Logan.com Tue Jan 7 00:53:07 2014 From: Rob at Logan.com (Rob Logan) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:53:07 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [SPAM] OmniOS random freezes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > My OmniOS host experiences random freezes. what is a ?freeze?? while its frozen: can you ping it (getty or other console related issue) does the shell on the console respond? (network stack issue) tapping the num lock key on a PS2 console keyboard light the num lock light? (hardware issue) forcing a dump will let us search the running stacks: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19082-01/819-2379/fvzpl/index.html Rob From henson at acm.org Tue Jan 7 03:37:16 2014 From: henson at acm.org (Paul B. Henson) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:37:16 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [discuss] disable NetBIOS-Over-TCP for smb server In-Reply-To: References: <20140104005904.GL7372@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> Message-ID: <006a01cf0b59$c4da9d10$4e8fd730$@acm.org> > From: Gordon Ross [mailto:gordon.w.ross at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 9:31 PM > > At the moment, no, there's no way to disable the NetBIOS listener. We > have a "knob" for that in updated SMB server code we're developing for > NexentaStor, so once that makes its way to illumos you'll have it. Cool, is that going to be in the same drop with SMB2 protocol support ;)? Any idea as to when that might get integrated? Thanks much. From sk at kram.io Tue Jan 7 12:51:39 2014 From: sk at kram.io (Steffen Kram) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:51:39 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] r151008 ipkg zone attach problems In-Reply-To: <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> References: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> Message-ID: <6E4B61D3-76F9-4F65-B860-682FE9C2BAF1@kram.io> Hi, beside this fix I?m still having problems re-attaching my zone. I just upgraded the global zone to r151008f. So I already got the fixed versions: root at hume:~# pkg info package/pkg ... FMRI: pkg://omnios/package/pkg at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131230T201906Z root at hume:~# pkg info system/zones/brand/ipkg ... FMRI: pkg://omnios/system/zones/brand/ipkg at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131230T201908Z Next I tried to update one of my non-global zones using the zoneadm attach -u command: root at hume:~# zoneadm -z telford attach -u Log File: /var/tmp/telford.attach_log.hmaqMh Attach Path: /zones/telford/root Attach ZFS Dataset: cairngorm/zones/telford/ROOT/zbe-2 Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z Cache: Using /var/pkg/publisher. Updating non-global zone: Output follows Creating Plan ERROR: Could not update attaching zone Result: Attach Failed. It did fail because of [ 7. Januar 2014 13:42:55 CET] Updating non-global zone: Output follows pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'omnios' do not appear to point to a valid pkg repository. Please verify the repository's location and the client's network configuration. Additional details: Unable to contact valid package repository Encountered the following error(s): Unable to contact any configured publishers. This is likely a network configuration problem. Framework error: code: 7 reason: Failed connect to localhost:10000; Connection refused URL: 'http://localhost:10000'. (happened 4 times) pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'uulm.mawi' do not appear to point to a valid pkg repository. Please verify the repository's location and the client's network configuration. Additional details: Unable to contact valid package repository Encountered the following error(s): Unable to contact any configured publishers. This is likely a network configuration problem. Framework error: code: 7 reason: Failed connect to localhost:10000; Connection refused URL: 'http://localhost:10000'. (happened 4 times) pkg install: The following pattern(s) did not match any allowable packages. Try using a different matching pattern, or refreshing publisher information: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z [ 7. Januar 2014 13:43:05 CET] ERROR: Could not update attaching zone [ 7. Januar 2014 13:43:08 CET] Result: Attach Failed. However, there was never a pkg publisher configured on localhost:10000 for this zone. I am able to upgrade and boot the zone when preforming the update from the global zone using zoneadm -R /zones/telford/root update and attaching the zone afterwards. In this case the publisher information in the non-global zone is empty and I have to re-add the omnios default publisher manually. Cheers, Steffen Am 06.01.2014 um 16:49 schrieb Dale Ghent : > > There's a fix out now for this, released on friday. New packages for: > > package/pkg > system/zones/brand/ipkg > > Update these before you do your zone-related work and it should work as expected. > > /dale > > On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Matthias Teege wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I noticed that I could not attach my non-global zones under r151008 >>> after upgrading from r151006. I made a couple VMs to reproduce, and it >> >> I run in the same issue. Can I attach the r151006 zones without "-u" >> and update later? >> >> Many Thanks >> Matthias >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From lotheac at iki.fi Tue Jan 7 13:57:21 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:57:21 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] r151008 ipkg zone attach problems In-Reply-To: <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> References: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> Message-ID: <20140107135721.GA21845@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Mon, Jan 06 2014 10:49:56 -0500, Dale Ghent wrote: > > There's a fix out now for this, released on friday. New packages for: > > package/pkg > system/zones/brand/ipkg What repo are these built from? I'm curious as to the fix and am not seeing any new commits in omniti-labs/omnios-build, postwait/pkg5 or omniti-labs/illumos-omnios on github. -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From ngoossens at gmail.com Tue Jan 7 20:13:03 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:13:03 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: Thank you Saso and Rob for your replies. I will answer what I can and provide an update as well. @Rob, With "freeze" I mean "hang". The system does not respond anymore. SSH sessions are disconnected ("broken pipe"), pings show "destination host unreachable". (IPMI) Console does not respond to key strokes. No freeze has occurred after my previous post, so I do not know if numlock lights up - I will make sure to test that. Last night something happened - I noticed today that even though the system is up, network connectivity is gone. More specifically, the only devices I can ping are my Macbook (which has an ssh session open to the OmniOS machine), the Netgear switch the Macbook is connected to, and the Netgear switch that the OmniOs machine is connected to. In /var/adm/messages, I can only find: Jan 7 03:10:00 controller cron[8392]: [ID 574227 user.alert] Solaris_audit getaddrinfo(controller) failed[node name or service name not known]: Error 0 Jan 7 03:30:00 controller cron[8393]: [ID 574227 user.alert] Solaris_audit getaddrinfo(controller) failed[node name or service name not known]: Error 0 So that's a cron job gone wrong because it cannot reach the network I guess. My next action will be to first yank the Intel PCIe NIC. @Saso, thanks for the great advice on how to test memory and the zfs pool! I will look into those next. Kind regards, Niels -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at dojcak.sk Wed Jan 8 12:45:04 2014 From: martin at dojcak.sk (Martin Dojcak) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:45:04 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Problem installing new zone (version problem) Message-ID: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> Hi everyone, i have production instalation of omnios with global zone of version r151006. Installation of non-global zones in the past has been successful, but now when i try to install new zone i have a problem with libc. For example in new installed zone: root at test:~# cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151008 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. pkg --version ld.so.1: python2.6: fatal: libc.so.1: version 'ILLUMOS_0.6' not found (required by file /usr/lib/amd64/libpython2.6.so.1.0) ld.so.1: python2.6: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed ldd /usr/lib/amd64/libpython2.6.so.1.0 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/64/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/64/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.2 => /lib/64/libm.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/64/libgcc_s.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/64/libc.so.1 libc.so.1 (ILLUMOS_0.6) => (version not found) libmp.so.2 => /lib/64/libmp.so.2 libmd.so.1 => /lib/64/libmd.so.1 or ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libc.so.1: version 'ILLUMOS_0.6' not found (required by file /usr/perl5/5.16.1/lib/i86pc-solaris-thread-multi-64int/CORE/libperl.so) ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed I think there is problem with version because global zone is r151006 but "zoneadm -z test install" install r151008 version with r151006 packages. On global zone I install omnios-userland package and freeze packages: pkg freeze NAME VERSION DATE COMMENT entire 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 12:36:35 CET Stay on r151006 incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 11:27:27 CET Stay on r151006 incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 11:27:36 CET Stay on r151006 then I tried to install new zone, but it brought an unsuccessful result. Im unable to upgrade entire system to new version r151008. zoneadm -z test attach -u Log File: /var/tmp/db-mini-1.attach_log.Lbay3e Attach Path: /zones/db-mini-1/root Attach ZFS Dataset: rpool/zones/db-mini-1/ROOT/zbe Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z in non-global zone: cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151008 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151008 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Can anyone help pls ? -- Martin Doj??k mail: martin at dojcak.sk jabber: martindojcak at jabbim.sk pgp: http://pgp.dojcak.sk/ From martin at dojcak.sk Wed Jan 8 18:30:15 2014 From: martin at dojcak.sk (Martin Dojcak) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:30:15 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Problem installing new zone (version problem) In-Reply-To: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> References: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> Message-ID: <52CD9937.8040800@dojcak.sk> It probably has nothing to do of the global zone. New hint: entire package in non-global zone (test) is entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z. Here is manifest of package http://pastebin.com/NJv5cRJC. But i really do not understand why "entire" pakcage for installing new zone is 151006 version and /etc/release is OmniOS v11 r151008. From manifest depend fmri=release/name at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151006: but on system is installed release/name at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:3A20131204T024419Z. There are more packages r151008. Here is the log from /var/pkg/history http://pastebin.com/PACcXPFf. On 01/08/2014 01:45 PM, Martin Dojcak wrote: > Hi everyone, > > i have production instalation of omnios with global zone of version r151006. > Installation of non-global zones in the past has been successful, but > now when i try to install new zone i have a problem with libc. For > example in new installed zone: > > root at test:~# cat /etc/release > OmniOS v11 r151008 > Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. > > pkg --version > ld.so.1: python2.6: fatal: libc.so.1: version 'ILLUMOS_0.6' not found > (required by file /usr/lib/amd64/libpython2.6.so.1.0) > ld.so.1: python2.6: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > Killed > > ldd /usr/lib/amd64/libpython2.6.so.1.0 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/64/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/64/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.2 => /lib/64/libm.so.2 > libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/64/libgcc_s.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/64/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (ILLUMOS_0.6) => (version not found) > libmp.so.2 => /lib/64/libmp.so.2 > libmd.so.1 => /lib/64/libmd.so.1 > > or > > ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libc.so.1: version 'ILLUMOS_0.6' not found > (required by file > /usr/perl5/5.16.1/lib/i86pc-solaris-thread-multi-64int/CORE/libperl.so) > ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > Killed > > I think there is problem with version because global zone is r151006 but > "zoneadm -z test install" install r151008 version with r151006 packages. > On global zone I install omnios-userland package and freeze packages: > pkg freeze > NAME VERSION DATE COMMENT > entire 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 12:36:35 CET Stay on r151006 > incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 11:27:27 CET > Stay on r151006 > incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland 11-0.151006 08 Jan 2014 11:27:36 CET > Stay on r151006 > > then I tried to install new zone, but it brought an unsuccessful result. > Im unable to upgrade entire system to new version r151008. > > zoneadm -z test attach -u > Log File: /var/tmp/db-mini-1.attach_log.Lbay3e > Attach Path: /zones/db-mini-1/root > Attach ZFS Dataset: rpool/zones/db-mini-1/ROOT/zbe > > Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath > Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z > Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z > > in non-global zone: > cat /etc/release > OmniOS v11 r151008 > Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. > > cat /etc/release > OmniOS v11 r151008 > Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. > > Can anyone help pls ? > -- Martin Doj??k mail: martin at dojcak.sk jabber: martindojcak at jabbim.sk pgp: http://pgp.dojcak.sk/ From lotheac at iki.fi Wed Jan 8 19:04:41 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:04:41 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Problem installing new zone (version problem) In-Reply-To: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> References: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> Message-ID: <20140108190441.GC15765@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Wed, Jan 08 2014 13:45:04 +0100, Martin Dojcak wrote: > in non-global zone: > cat /etc/release > OmniOS v11 r151008 > Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. This is probably due to omnios-userland not getting installed in the non-global zone. I think that was fixed with a new r151006 'entire' (which has a depend type=require on omnios-userland; earlier version did not actually make sure omnios-userland is installed) sometime in December, but you need to have that fix in your GZ because non-global zones are always installed with the same exact version of entire as the GZ. Or as a workaround, you can tell zoneadm to install the correct version of omnios-userland as an extra package (-e was the command line flag I think). -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From martin at dojcak.sk Wed Jan 8 19:57:42 2014 From: martin at dojcak.sk (Martin Dojcak) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 20:57:42 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Problem installing new zone (version problem) In-Reply-To: <20140108190441.GC15765@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> <20140108190441.GC15765@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <52CDADB6.80302@dojcak.sk> Solved! Workaround perform successful instalation of zone. I run zoneadm -z test install -e incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland at 11,5.11-0.151006.In the non-global zone are no longer any pakcages with r151008. I thnik omnios guys should fix pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20131210T224515Z and later versions with omnios-userland type=require. I will upgrade GZ to r151008 as soon as I can. Thank you very much Lauri. On 01/08/2014 08:04 PM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08 2014 13:45:04 +0100, Martin Dojcak wrote: >> in non-global zone: >> cat /etc/release >> OmniOS v11 r151008 >> Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. >> Use is subject to license terms. > > This is probably due to omnios-userland not getting installed in the > non-global zone. I think that was fixed with a new r151006 'entire' > (which has a depend type=require on omnios-userland; earlier version did > not actually make sure omnios-userland is installed) sometime in > December, but you need to have that fix in your GZ because non-global > zones are always installed with the same exact version of entire as the > GZ. Or as a workaround, you can tell zoneadm to install the correct > version of omnios-userland as an extra package (-e was the command line > flag I think). > -- Martin Doj??k mail: martin at dojcak.sk jabber: martindojcak at jabbim.sk pgp: http://pgp.dojcak.sk/ From lotheac at iki.fi Wed Jan 8 20:09:08 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:09:08 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Problem installing new zone (version problem) In-Reply-To: <52CDADB6.80302@dojcak.sk> References: <52CD4850.60009@dojcak.sk> <20140108190441.GC15765@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <52CDADB6.80302@dojcak.sk> Message-ID: <20140108200908.GD15765@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Wed, Jan 08 2014 20:57:42 +0100, Martin Dojcak wrote: > I thnik omnios guys should fix > pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20131210T224515Z and later versions > with omnios-userland type=require. They already have: % pkg contents -rm pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20131210T224515Z|grep userland depend fmri=incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland at 11,5.11-0.151006 type=incorporate depend fmri=incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland type=require Your issue was that your entire was older (and did not include this fix). -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From alka at hfg-gmuend.de Thu Jan 9 09:51:37 2014 From: alka at hfg-gmuend.de (Guenther Alka) Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:51:37 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] netatalk setup (via uulm.mawi repo) failed with ld.so.1: afpd: fatal: libsasl2.so.2: open failed In-Reply-To: References: <52bf406a.09d10e0a.026b.fffff6d6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <52CE7129.6030508@hfg-gmuend.de> When installing netatalk (3.05) and OmniOS 1006 and 1006 in napp-it the installer runs fine after a: pkg set-publisher -g http://scott.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/release uulm.mawi pkg install netatalk pkg unset-publisher uulm.mawi but when I try to enable the netatalk service it ended with a: ld.so.1: afpd: fatal: libsasl2.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory It seems the problem are newer sas library files, that you now have in /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.3 instead the searched libsasl2.so.2 I solved the problem with: ln -s /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 ln -s /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.3 /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.2 Gea napp-it.org From sk at kram.io Thu Jan 9 11:27:39 2014 From: sk at kram.io (Steffen Kram) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:27:39 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] netatalk setup (via uulm.mawi repo) failed with ld.so.1: afpd: fatal: libsasl2.so.2: open failed In-Reply-To: <52CE7129.6030508@hfg-gmuend.de> References: <52bf406a.09d10e0a.026b.fffff6d6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <52CE7129.6030508@hfg-gmuend.de> Message-ID: <0A328C77-BBCC-4DD4-8722-7A5021F9196A@kram.io> Hi Guenther, currently I?m in the middle updating my repository to 151008. I might have accidentally published a newer version of the sasl-package with 151006 version string. I?ll check this. The problem I?m facing right now, is that my sasl libs depend on libpq5 which I cannot build right now. See my comment on ticket http://omnios.omniti.com/ticket.php/83 for details. Meanwhile you should be able to use the old libsasl2. The old packages are still lying around. I?ll drop you a note as soon as I?ve updated all packages. Cheers, Steffen Am 09.01.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Guenther Alka : > When installing netatalk (3.05) and OmniOS 1006 and 1006 in napp-it the installer runs fine after a: > > pkg set-publisher -g http://scott.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/release uulm.mawi > pkg install netatalk > pkg unset-publisher uulm.mawi > > but when I try to enable the netatalk service it ended with a: > ld.so.1: afpd: fatal: libsasl2.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory > > It seems the problem are newer sas library files, that you now have in > /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 > /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.3 > > instead the searched libsasl2.so.2 > > I solved the problem with: > ln -s /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 > ln -s /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.3 /usr/local/lib/amd64/libsasl2.so.2 > > > Gea > napp-it.org > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From damian at virtualunix.eu Thu Jan 9 15:04:45 2014 From: damian at virtualunix.eu (Damian McD) Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:04:45 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] libc.so.1 checksum Message-ID: <157d329641c729037b21a6d1f2d55724@virtualunix.eu> I was following some security guidelines in Oracle's docs and get an error regarding libc.so.1 via pkg verify pkg://omnios/system/library file: lib/libc.so.1 Elfhash: 21008faaa95e095cdd5a6200dee4659db922fb66 should be 560f24729aedd180595ce78e58e95432ea93f5ad ls -l /lib/libc.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 1575684 Dec 10 21:39 /lib/libc.so.1 As a workaround could I download and install the library.p5i? From cnehren+omnios-discuss at omniti.com Thu Jan 9 16:06:52 2014 From: cnehren+omnios-discuss at omniti.com (Chris Nehren) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:06:52 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] libc.so.1 checksum In-Reply-To: <157d329641c729037b21a6d1f2d55724@virtualunix.eu> References: <157d329641c729037b21a6d1f2d55724@virtualunix.eu> Message-ID: <20140109160652.GA47654@eschaton.local> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 15:04:45 +0000, Damian McD wrote: > I was following some security guidelines in Oracle's docs and get an > error regarding libc.so.1 via pkg verify > > > pkg://omnios/system/library > file: lib/libc.so.1 > Elfhash: 21008faaa95e095cdd5a6200dee4659db922fb66 should > be 560f24729aedd180595ce78e58e95432ea93f5ad > > ls -l /lib/libc.so.1 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 1575684 Dec 10 21:39 /lib/libc.so.1 This is not actually an issue because of the way we're delivering libc.so.1. If you look at your mounts you'll see that there's a mount for that file, which changes the elfhash. -- Chris Nehren Site Reliability Engineer, OmniTI From mounty at landcroft.com Thu Jan 9 20:23:13 2014 From: mounty at landcroft.com (Entfernt) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:23:13 +1000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server Message-ID: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> This question covers OmniOS and the usual Supermicro hardware base. I want to add a four-port gigabit ethernet card to a 5017C-LF: http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/5017/sys-5017c-lf.cfm So that's PCI Express x8. Most cards for the machine are two-port but this one: http://www.iphase.com/products/product.cfm/PCI%20Express/399 appears to fit the bill. In particular, it has the Broadcom? BCM5704C chipset which appears on the HCL: https://www.illumos.org/hcl/ but I'm a programmer rather than a sysadmin or hardware person. Can anyone see any obvious reason for the card not working ? Thanks in expectation. -- Michael Mounteney From danmcd at omniti.com Thu Jan 9 21:50:17 2014 From: danmcd at omniti.com (Dan McDonald) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:50:17 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> Message-ID: <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Entfernt wrote: > This question covers OmniOS and the usual Supermicro hardware base. I want to add a four-port gigabit ethernet card to a 5017C-LF: > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/5017/sys-5017c-lf.cfm > > So that's PCI Express x8. > > Most cards for the machine are two-port but this one: > > http://www.iphase.com/products/product.cfm/PCI%20Express/399 > > appears to fit the bill. In particular, it has the Broadcom? BCM5704C chipset which appears on the HCL: > > https://www.illumos.org/hcl/ This is a pretty good one to pick. It's supported by open-source 'bge'. > but I'm a programmer rather than a sysadmin or hardware person. Can anyone see any obvious reason for the card not working ? Thanks in expectation. If you want something a bit more modern, you could try the Intel I350: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106129 But the one you mentioned SHOULD work just fine. Dan From jim.oltman at gmail.com Thu Jan 9 22:41:20 2014 From: jim.oltman at gmail.com (Jim Oltman) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:41:20 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Entfernt wrote: > > > This question covers OmniOS and the usual Supermicro hardware base. I > want to add a four-port gigabit ethernet card to a 5017C-LF: > > > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/5017/sys-5017c-lf.cfm > > > > So that's PCI Express x8. > > > > Most cards for the machine are two-port but this one: > > > > http://www.iphase.com/products/product.cfm/PCI%20Express/399 > > > > appears to fit the bill. In particular, it has the Broadcom? BCM5704C > chipset which appears on the HCL: > > > > https://www.illumos.org/hcl/ > > This is a pretty good one to pick. It's supported by open-source 'bge'. > > > but I'm a programmer rather than a sysadmin or hardware person. Can > anyone see any obvious reason for the card not working ? Thanks in > expectation. > > If you want something a bit more modern, you could try the Intel I350: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106129 > > But the one you mentioned SHOULD work just fine. > > Dan It's recommended to stick with Intel hardware as it's most supported. I would go with Dan's recommendation. He knows his stuff. Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danmcd at omniti.com Thu Jan 9 22:55:04 2014 From: danmcd at omniti.com (Dan McDonald) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:55:04 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> Message-ID: <6B5BD9EB-A582-4DAC-93F8-25293A9264D3@omniti.com> On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Jim Oltman wrote: > > It's recommended to stick with Intel hardware as it's most supported. I would go with Dan's recommendation. He knows his stuff. The reason people buy Broadcom is because it's cheaper... MUCH cheaper sometimes. Luckily, the Broadcom part mentioned by the original poster was a NetXreme I part, which is open-source-happy bge, AND already supported. It's not like he looked at a 5720 (two ports per chip, and mostly working, but not yet integrated) or 5719 (four ports per chip, and has Real Problems from what I've seen and tested). The original poster could go with the specific Broadcom board he found and would be fine. I mentioned the I350 for completeness and paranoia. Dan From gate03 at landcroft.co.uk Thu Jan 9 23:26:45 2014 From: gate03 at landcroft.co.uk (Michael Mounteney) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:26:45 +1100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <6B5BD9EB-A582-4DAC-93F8-25293A9264D3@omniti.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> <6B5BD9EB-A582-4DAC-93F8-25293A9264D3@omniti.com> Message-ID: Thanks for your comments Dan. The board I found is a PCI Express x8 whereas the I350 is x4. What does that mean, and does it matter at all ? The server has an x8 slot. > Luckily, the Broadcom part mentioned by the original poster was a NetXreme > I part, which is open-source-happy bge, AND already supported. It's not > like he looked at a 5720 (two ports per chip, and mostly working, but not > yet integrated) or 5719 (four ports per chip, and has Real Problems from > what I've seen and tested). > > The original poster could go with the specific Broadcom board he found and > would be fine. I mentioned the I350 for completeness and paranoia. Michael. From gate03 at landcroft.co.uk Thu Jan 9 23:48:08 2014 From: gate03 at landcroft.co.uk (Michael Mounteney) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:48:08 +1100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> Message-ID: <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> > Hello, > > you need a Riser-Card (RSC-RR1U-E8) too. > > Take a look at Supermicro add-on Cards: > http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/index.cfm > > There you can find a 4 Port Intel Nic > http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/addon/AOC-UG-i4.cfm I appreciate that you are trying to help, Alexandre, but there are two points that I find puzzling in your advice. Firstly that I've never seen any other reference to needing a riser for a PCI card. SAS, yes; PCI, no. Secondly, Supermicro's own compatibility matrix for the product, at http://www.supermicro.nl/support/resources/AOC/UIO_AOC_Compatibility.cfm , excludes the NIC you mention from my hardware; it is a full-height card and the 5017C-LF only accommodates low-profile. Michael. From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Thu Jan 9 23:55:13 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:55:13 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <6D3990BC-01C7-44FB-B26C-95CE5383D6BC@omniti.com> <6B5BD9EB-A582-4DAC-93F8-25293A9264D3@omniti.com> Message-ID: <52CF36E1.3010802@gmail.com> On 1/9/14, 11:26 PM, Michael Mounteney wrote: > Thanks for your comments Dan. > > The board I found is a PCI Express x8 whereas the I350 is x4. What does > that mean, and does it matter at all ? The server has an x8 slot. As both cards use PCI-Express 2.0, four lanes are able to deliver up to 4x 4Gbit/s full duplex. Given that the card is a 4x 1Gbit/s Ethernet part, I wouldn't worry about it. -- Saso From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 00:02:07 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:07 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> Message-ID: <52CF387F.1040200@gmail.com> On 1/9/14, 11:48 PM, Michael Mounteney wrote: >> Hello, >> >> you need a Riser-Card (RSC-RR1U-E8) too. >> >> Take a look at Supermicro add-on Cards: >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/index.cfm >> >> There you can find a 4 Port Intel Nic >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/addon/AOC-UG-i4.cfm > > I appreciate that you are trying to help, Alexandre, but there are two > points that I find puzzling in your advice. > > Firstly that I've never seen any other reference to needing a riser for a > PCI card. SAS, yes; PCI, no. Of course you need a riser. How else do you think the card's gonna make that turn from vertical to horizontal to fit in that chassis? PCI risers are simply (most commonly) passive mechanical adapters that allow you to route PCI ports to other physical locations within the chassis. And SAS risers? Never of that. Don't you mean expanders? > Secondly, Supermicro's own compatibility matrix for the product, at > http://www.supermicro.nl/support/resources/AOC/UIO_AOC_Compatibility.cfm , > excludes the NIC you mention from my hardware; it is a full-height card > and the 5017C-LF only accommodates low-profile. Interesting, because from the pictures it *looks* like a full-height slot. But yeah, if it's low-profile-only, then you'd wanna get something that fits into low-profile (like the I350-T4: http://tinyurl.com/ncwa92s ) -- Saso From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 00:08:06 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:08:06 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> Message-ID: <52CF39E6.4020304@gmail.com> On 1/9/14, 8:23 PM, Entfernt wrote: > This question covers OmniOS and the usual Supermicro hardware base. I want to add a four-port gigabit ethernet card to a 5017C-LF: > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/5017/sys-5017c-lf.cfm > > So that's PCI Express x8. > > Most cards for the machine are two-port but this one: > > http://www.iphase.com/products/product.cfm/PCI%20Express/399 > > appears to fit the bill. In particular, it has the Broadcom? BCM5704C chipset which appears on the HCL: > > https://www.illumos.org/hcl/ > > but I'm a programmer rather than a sysadmin or hardware person. Can anyone see any obvious reason for the card not working ? Thanks in expectation. > > Oh and one last thing: what do you *need* the extra 2 ports for? As in, do you need them for the physically separate ports, or do you need the extra performance? If it's for the performance, it might make sense to look at 10-gig NICs. Dual-port 10-gig can be had in low-profile for just a little more money than 4x 1-gig. But of course, if it doesn't fit your workload requirements, then ignore me. Just a thought... -- Saso From mattfrazer at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 00:46:16 2014 From: mattfrazer at gmail.com (Matthew Frazer) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 19:46:16 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <52CF387F.1040200@gmail.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> <52CF387F.1040200@gmail.com> Message-ID: I think the confusion is partly on supermicro. The manual for the server states: ... The 5017C-LF includes a CSE-RR1U-E8 riser card. This riser ?ts into a PCI slot to support a full-height, half-length PCI Express expansion card. (The riser card provides a PCI-E x8 signal ... Which appears to be at odds with the spec sheet that states: - 1x PCI-E 3.0* x8 Low-profile slot It certainly looks like a full height slot but the spec sheet also states 2x2.5" bays maximum where the manual states 4x2.5". I can't see how 4x2.5" is possible with a full height card, so it's entirely possible that all the above statements are true depending on the how you order it. You'll need a reseller or someone with direct experience to be sure. -mjf On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 1/9/14, 11:48 PM, Michael Mounteney wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> you need a Riser-Card (RSC-RR1U-E8) too. > >> > >> Take a look at Supermicro add-on Cards: > >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/index.cfm > >> > >> There you can find a 4 Port Intel Nic > >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/addon/AOC-UG-i4.cfm > > > > I appreciate that you are trying to help, Alexandre, but there are two > > points that I find puzzling in your advice. > > > > Firstly that I've never seen any other reference to needing a riser for a > > PCI card. SAS, yes; PCI, no. > > Of course you need a riser. How else do you think the card's gonna make > that turn from vertical to horizontal to fit in that chassis? PCI risers > are simply (most commonly) passive mechanical adapters that allow you to > route PCI ports to other physical locations within the chassis. > > And SAS risers? Never of that. Don't you mean expanders? > > > Secondly, Supermicro's own compatibility matrix for the product, at > > http://www.supermicro.nl/support/resources/AOC/UIO_AOC_Compatibility.cfm, > > excludes the NIC you mention from my hardware; it is a full-height card > > and the 5017C-LF only accommodates low-profile. > > Interesting, because from the pictures it *looks* like a full-height > slot. But yeah, if it's low-profile-only, then you'd wanna get something > that fits into low-profile (like the I350-T4: http://tinyurl.com/ncwa92s ) > > -- > Saso > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- It is in love that we are made, in love we disappear. -Leonard Cohen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gate03 at landcroft.co.uk Fri Jan 10 00:58:48 2014 From: gate03 at landcroft.co.uk (Michael Mounteney) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:58:48 +1100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <52CF44FD.10101@gmail.com> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> <52CF387F.1040200@gmail.com> <30caa541ac1624df4be1fb3fd45d1077.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> <52CF42DF.3040609@gmail.com> <52CF44FD.10101@gmail.com> Message-ID: <156220b6d6187f3f6f5ac3f2b367749d.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> > On 1/10/14, 12:46 AM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: >> How about getting a dedicated 8-port gig switch? Sure, it can be a bit >> of extra hassle, but for the kind of money you'll spend on a 4-port >> gig-E server NIC you can also get a reasonable dedicated rack-mountable >> 8-port gig-E switch (Linksys SRW2008 seems like a workable basic switch >> for SOHO deployments). > > You may also want to have a look at Cisco's 300 series of SOHO switches. > I'm seeing a SG 300-10 (10-port gig-E managed) for about $200 on Amazon > - that's damn cheap for a Cisco-anything. Maybe they're crap, haven't > tried one myself, though it does look tempting... I already have a secondhand Netgear GS724T which hopefully should be up to the job. Thanks again, Michael. From sergey57 at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 02:45:59 2014 From: sergey57 at gmail.com (sergey ivanov) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] r151008 ipkg zone attach problems In-Reply-To: <6E4B61D3-76F9-4F65-B860-682FE9C2BAF1@kram.io> References: <20131207165258.GA7252@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <90524a43-e12c-4e09-97dd-5cb957c48a17@mteege.de> <4A790812-F8A0-4FA9-991E-355FC4C8F160@omniti.com> <6E4B61D3-76F9-4F65-B860-682FE9C2BAF1@kram.io> Message-ID: I had similar problem. I do not see "update" verb in zoneadm command. I think "pkg -R /root update" was used for upgrading detached zones. For me it did not work initially. All detached zones had empty list of publishers. So, to workaround the problem, the needed steps were the following: 1. Recreate package publishers, that is, for all publishers do --- pkg -R /root set-publisher -g http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/releaseomnios --- 2. Update zone image --- pkg -R /root update --- 3. Attach the zone --- zoneadm -z attach --- When I've tried after 1-st step, instead of updating packages from global zone just attaching with '-u', all publishers were unset immediately. -- Regards, Sergey Ivanov. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Steffen Kram wrote: > Hi, > > beside this fix I?m still having problems re-attaching my zone. I just > upgraded the global zone to r151008f. So I already got the fixed versions: > > root at hume:~# pkg info package/pkg > ... FMRI: pkg://omnios/package/pkg at 0.5.11 > ,5.11-0.151008:20131230T201906Z > root at hume:~# pkg info system/zones/brand/ipkg > ... FMRI: pkg://omnios/system/zones/brand/ipkg at 0.5.11 > ,5.11-0.151008:20131230T201908Z > > Next I tried to update one of my non-global zones using the zoneadm attach > -u command: > > root at hume:~# zoneadm -z telford attach -u > Log File: /var/tmp/telford.attach_log.hmaqMh > Attach Path: /zones/telford/root > Attach ZFS Dataset: cairngorm/zones/telford/ROOT/zbe-2 > > Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath > Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z > Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z > Cache: Using /var/pkg/publisher. > Updating non-global zone: Output follows > Creating Plan > ERROR: Could not update attaching zone > Result: Attach Failed. > > It did fail because of > > [ 7. Januar 2014 13:42:55 CET] Updating non-global zone: Output follows > pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'omnios' do not appear to point to > a valid pkg repository. > Please verify the repository's location and the client's network > configuration. > Additional details: > > Unable to contact valid package repository > Encountered the following error(s): > Unable to contact any configured publishers. > This is likely a network configuration problem. > Framework error: code: 7 reason: Failed connect to localhost:10000; > Connection refused > URL: 'http://localhost:10000'. (happened 4 times) > > pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'uulm.mawi' do not appear to point > to a valid pkg repository. > Please verify the repository's location and the client's network > configuration. > Additional details: > > Unable to contact valid package repository > Encountered the following error(s): > Unable to contact any configured publishers. > This is likely a network configuration problem. > Framework error: code: 7 reason: Failed connect to localhost:10000; > Connection refused > URL: 'http://localhost:10000'. (happened 4 times) > > > pkg install: The following pattern(s) did not match any allowable > packages. Try > using a different matching pattern, or refreshing publisher information: > > entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z > [ 7. Januar 2014 13:43:05 CET] ERROR: Could not update attaching zone > [ 7. Januar 2014 13:43:08 CET] Result: Attach Failed. > > However, there was never a pkg publisher configured on localhost:10000 for > this zone. > > I am able to upgrade and boot the zone when preforming the update from the > global zone using > > zoneadm -R /zones/telford/root update > > and attaching the zone afterwards. In this case the publisher information > in the non-global zone is empty and I have to re-add the omnios default > publisher manually. > > Cheers, > Steffen > > > Am 06.01.2014 um 16:49 schrieb Dale Ghent : > > > > > There's a fix out now for this, released on friday. New packages for: > > > > package/pkg > > system/zones/brand/ipkg > > > > Update these before you do your zone-related work and it should work as > expected. > > > > /dale > > > > On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Matthias Teege < > matthias-omn-discuss at mteege.de> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> I noticed that I could not attach my non-global zones under r151008 > >>> after upgrading from r151006. I made a couple VMs to reproduce, and it > >> > >> I run in the same issue. Can I attach the r151006 zones without "-u" > >> and update later? > >> > >> Many Thanks > >> Matthias > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list > >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > -- Regards, Sergey Ivanov | sergey57 at gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sergey-ivanov/8/270/a09 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From groups at tierarzt-mueller.de Fri Jan 10 11:18:09 2014 From: groups at tierarzt-mueller.de (Alexander Lesle) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:18:09 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] the right card for a server In-Reply-To: <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> References: <20140110062313.45d3e7134802ab54ab4bbded@landcroft.com> <1973910759.20140109231509@tierarzt-mueller.de> <30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel@landcroft.co.uk> Message-ID: <0309633.20140110121809@tierarzt-mueller.de> Morning Michael and List, am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014 um 00:48 hat u.a. in mid:30e9da749bc0b63d2beb1803d85abac7.squirrel at landcroft.co.uk geschrieben: >> you need a Riser-Card (RSC-RR1U-E8) too. About riser-card you got a answer from Matthew Frazer. >> Take a look at Supermicro add-on Cards: >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/index.cfm >> >> There you can find a 4 Port Intel Nic >> http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/addon/AOC-UG-i4.cfm > I appreciate that you are trying to help, Alexandre, but there are two > points that I find puzzling in your advice. > Firstly that I've never seen any other reference to needing a riser for a > PCI card. SAS, yes; PCI, no. > Secondly, Supermicro's own compatibility matrix for the product, at > http://www.supermicro.nl/support/resources/AOC/UIO_AOC_Compatibility.cfm > excludes the NIC you mention from my hardware; it is a full-height card > and the 5017C-LF only accommodates low-profile. Thats about the slot-plate nothing else. UIO is it on the other side. Its not a problem to chance it to standard and the SM add-on cards are quite cheap. Look at the 4-port interphase nic the specs tells also: Form Factor: PCI express, standard height, half length and standard height is full height I have found this Intel nic in low profile, but maybe EOL http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/network-adapters/gigabit-network-adapters/pro-1000-pt-qp.html -- Mit freundlichem Gruss Alexander mailto:groups at tierarzt-mueller.de eMail geschrieben mit: The Bat! 5.8.8 unter Windows 7 Pro Service Pack 1 From natxo.asenjo at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 11:46:37 2014 From: natxo.asenjo at gmail.com (Natxo Asenjo) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:46:37 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] zoneadm -z zone attach -u fails In-Reply-To: References: <20131213162641.GE5178@eschaton.local> Message-ID: hi, to follow up in this issue, today I read in another post that updating pkg and ipkg should solve this, so I booted in r151008, updated pkg and ipkg in that BE and retried the zone attach command: # /usr/sbin/zoneadm -z zone1 attach -u Log File: /var/tmp/zone1.attach_log.qDaiXc Attach Path: /tank/zones/zone1/root Attach ZFS Dataset: tank/zones/zone1/ROOT/zbe-1 Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z Cache: Using /var/pkg/publisher. Updating non-global zone: Output follows Creating Plan ERROR: Could not update attaching zone Result: Attach Failed. in the log file I see this: pkg set-publisher: Publisher 'omnios' is disabled and cannot be used for packaging operations. pkg install: The following pattern(s) did not match any allowable packages. Try using a different matching pattern, or refreshing publisher information: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z [January 10, 2014 12:37:28 PM CET] ERROR: Could not update attaching zone [January 10, 2014 12:37:29 PM CET] Result: Attach Failed. Any clues as to why this is failing? This is just a test zone, so it is not a big deal to wipe it and go on with my life, but I am just curious as to why it is failing. TIA, -- Groeten, natxo From sergey57 at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 12:42:42 2014 From: sergey57 at gmail.com (sergey ivanov) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:42:42 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] zoneadm -z zone attach -u fails In-Reply-To: References: <20131213162641.GE5178@eschaton.local> Message-ID: I still have a problem with upgrading to 151008 my first testing host, running some non-global zones. I think the cause of my problems is absence of packages built for 151008 in omniti-ms repository. Global zone upgraded per instructions without problems. When I tried attaching with '-u' non-global zones, it failed. Running 'pkg -R /root -u' for these zones from global zones revealed that they have lost all publishers. Readding publishers with 'pkg -R /root pkg set-publisher -g ' and then running 'pkg -R /root update' worked for some of the zones. But some completed update very fast, without much of work done: --- # pkg -R /root/ update Packages to update: 7 Create boot environment: No Create backup boot environment: No DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) Completed 7/7 151/151 6.1/6.1 PHASE ACTIONS Install Phase 5/5 Update Phase 163/163 PHASE ITEMS Package State Update Phase 14/14 Package Cache Update Phase 7/7 Image State Update Phase 2/2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Please review release notes posted at: http://omnios.omniti.com/ReleaseNotes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- I looked at the list of packages installed there by 'pkg -R ... list' and saw not any package from 151008 release! I tried running 'pkg -R ... update' second time, I got: --- # pkg -R /root/ update Creating Plan | pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints Plan Creation: Package solver has not found a solution to update to latest available versions. This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed. latest incorporations: pkg://omnios/consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T022427Z pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131206T160517Z pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024149Z Dependency analysis is unable to determine exact cause. Try specifying expected results to obtain more detailed error messages. --- Then I was trying to update these packgages one by one in -R /root, and I think I saw the cause of my problem: --- # pkg -R /root/ install pkg://omnios/consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T022427Z Creating Plan / pkg install: No matching version of consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation can be installed: Reject: pkg://omnios/consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T022427Z Reason: This version is excluded by installed incorporation pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130506T183443Z # pkg -R /root/ install pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130506T183443Z No updates necessary for this image. # pkg -R /root/ install pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate at 11,5.11-0.151008 Creating Plan / pkg install: No matching version of incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate can be installed: Reject: pkg://omnios/incorporation/jeos/illumos-gate at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024149Z Reason: This version is excluded by installed incorporation pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20131210T224515Z # pkg -R /root/ install pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151008 Creating Plan / pkg install: No matching version of entire can be installed: Reject: pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T230829Z pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T191306Z pkg://omnios/entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z Reason: This version is excluded by installed incorporation pkg://ms.omniti.com/omniti/database/postgresql-930 at 9.3.0,5.11-0.151006:20130918T174100Z This version is excluded by installed incorporation pkg://ms.omniti.com/omniti/library/uuid at 1.41.14,5.11-0.151006:20131015T044739Z --- So, I think I have to wait until omniti-ms will have packages for new stable release, or to build these packages myself. -- Regards, Sergey Ivanov. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > hi, > > to follow up in this issue, today I read in another post that updating > pkg and ipkg should solve this, so I booted in > r151008, updated pkg and ipkg in that BE and retried the zone attach > command: > > # /usr/sbin/zoneadm -z zone1 attach -u > Log File: /var/tmp/zone1.attach_log.qDaiXc > Attach Path: /tank/zones/zone1/root > Attach ZFS Dataset: tank/zones/zone1/ROOT/zbe-1 > > Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath > Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z > Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151006:20130507T204959Z > Cache: Using /var/pkg/publisher. > Updating non-global zone: Output follows > Creating Plan > ERROR: Could not update attaching zone > Result: Attach Failed. > > in the log file I see this: > > pkg set-publisher: Publisher 'omnios' is disabled and cannot be used > for packaging operations. > > pkg install: The following pattern(s) did not match any allowable > packages. Try > using a different matching pattern, or refreshing publisher information: > > entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z > [January 10, 2014 12:37:28 PM CET] ERROR: Could not update attaching zone > [January 10, 2014 12:37:29 PM CET] Result: Attach > Failed. > > Any clues as to why this is failing? This is just a test zone, so it > is not a big deal to wipe it and go on with my life, but I am just > curious as to why it is failing. > > TIA, > > -- > Groeten, > natxo > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- Regards, Sergey Ivanov | sergey57 at gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sergey-ivanov/8/270/a09 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From natxo.asenjo at gmail.com Fri Jan 10 13:29:24 2014 From: natxo.asenjo at gmail.com (Natxo Asenjo) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:29:24 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] zoneadm -z zone attach -u fails In-Reply-To: References: <20131213162641.GE5178@eschaton.local> Message-ID: hi, Thanks to Sergey's tips I got it working. Here is how: 1. I checked the list of publishers in the zone, and indeed, omnios was missing: root at zfstank:~# pkg -R /tank/zones/zone1/root/ publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI omnios.blackdot.be origin online http://omnios.blackdot.be/ 2. Then I added the omnios publisher: root at zfstank:~# pkg -R /tank/zones/zone1/root/ set-publisher -g http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/ omnios 3. Rechecked the publishers' list, now you see omnios in there: root at zfstank:~# pkg -R /tank/zones/zone1/root/ publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI omnios.blackdot.be origin online http://omnios.blackdot.be/ omnios origin online http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/ 4. Run the update: root at zfstank:~# pkg -R /tank/zones/zone1/root/ update Packages to remove: 4 Packages to update: 375 Create boot environment: No Create backup boot environment: No Services to change: 1 DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) Completed 379/379 11962/11962 193.5/193.5 PHASE ACTIONS Removal Phase 12268/12268 Install Phase 10325/10325 Update Phase 8660/8660 PHASE ITEMS Package State Update Phase 754/754 Package Cache Update Phase 379/379 Image State Update Phase 2/2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Please review release notes posted at: http://omnios.omniti.com/ReleaseNotes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Attache the zone: root at zfstank:~# zoneadm -z zone1 attach Log File: /var/tmp/zone1.attach_log.FMaGQf Attach Path: /tank/zones/zone1/root Attach ZFS Dataset: tank/zones/zone1/ROOT/zbe-1 Installing: Using pre-existing data in zonepath Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z Non-Global zone version: entire at 11,5.11-0.151008:20131205T195242Z Cache: Using /var/pkg/publisher. Updating non-global zone: Output follows No updates necessary for this image. Result: Attach Succeeded. 6. Booted the zone, all is well now. Thanks! -- regards, Natxo From cj.keist at colostate.edu Fri Jan 10 20:57:31 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:57:31 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS Message-ID: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> Looking to see if OmniOS runs well as a VM with Proxmox? We are running Proxmox 3.1-3 currently. I was able to get OmniOS to install but have issue in that it is not enabling the 4 cpus I defined for the vm. Boot states something like it sees 4 cpus but only enabled one. See boot-ncpus with eeprom to set more cpus. I did this and rebooted, but the system still only enables one cpu of the four. Setup: Memory: 4gb Processors 4(1 socket, 4cores)[qemu64] hard disk(ide0) format vmdk, cache=writethrough size=12gb Network Device(net0) e1000 bridge=vmbr0 Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' From mir at miras.org Fri Jan 10 23:56:45 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:56:45 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:57:31 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > > Setup: > Memory: 4gb > Processors 4(1 socket, 4cores)[qemu64] > hard disk(ide0) format vmdk, cache=writethrough size=12gb > Network Device(net0) e1000 bridge=vmbr0 > Omnios does not handle cores, only sockets. So do this instead: Processors 4(4 socket, 1cores)[qemu64] And for performance: hard disk(sata0) format qcow2, cache=none size=12gb -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: You have the body of a 19 year old. Please return it before it gets wrinkled. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From henson at acm.org Sat Jan 11 02:36:46 2014 From: henson at acm.org (Paul B. Henson) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:36:46 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Supermicro IPMI based BIOS update In-Reply-To: References: <094801cef550$b5cc58a0$216509e0$@acm.org> Message-ID: <03f401cf0e75$faf5d0d0$f0e17270$@acm.org> > From: wuffers [mailto:moo at wuffers.net] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 7:35 PM > > I've just emailed my reseller about this, so I'll update this thread when I get a > response. Did you ever get a response? So far I have still been unable to find a source for purchasing these "IPMI BIOS update" license keys... From ypismerov at gmail.com Sat Jan 11 13:47:30 2014 From: ypismerov at gmail.com (Yuri Pismerov) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:47:30 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkg update Message-ID: <26647D0A-7112-4F2D-B757-7E19F562BBDE@gmail.com> t does not seem it works :( root at omnios:~# pkg update pkg: 0/1 catalogs successfully updated: Unable to contact valid package repository Encountered the following error(s): Unable to contact any configured publishers. This is likely a network configuration problem. http protocol error: code: 404 reason: Not Found URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/bloody'. (happened 4 times) root at omnios:~# cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151007 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ypismerov at gmail.com Sat Jan 11 14:47:31 2014 From: ypismerov at gmail.com (Yuri Pismerov) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:47:31 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkg update Message-ID: I am on bloody and trying to upgrade. After reading the list I found that bloody repository is no longer available, so I tried: root at omnios:~# pkg unset-publisher omnios root at omnios:~# pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release omnios root at omnios:~# pkg update Creating Plan - pkg update: The certificate which issued this certificate:/C=US/ST=Maryland/O=OmniTI/OU=OmniOS/CN=OmniOS r151008 Release Signing Certificate/emailAddress=om nios-support at omniti.com could not be found. The issuer is:/C=US/ST=Maryland/L=Fulton/O=OmniTI/CN=OmniTI Certificate Authority The package involved is:pkg://omnios/library/libtool/libltdl at 2.4.2,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024209Z Then, after more reading, I found that CA ccert an be installed by downloading an unsigned package as follows: root at omnios:~# pkg update web/ca-bundle at 5.11,5.11-0.151007:20130823T212116Z Creating Plan pkg update: 'web/ca-bundle at 5.11,5.11-0.151007:20130823T212116Z' matches no installed packages As it says, it did not work. What are my options now? root at omnios:~# cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151007 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mir at miras.org Sat Jan 11 14:56:13 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:56:13 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkg update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140111155613.5abd7fd6@sleipner.datanom.net> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:47:31 -0500 Yuri Pismerov wrote: > > As it says, it did not work. What are my options now? > The least painful is to reinstall with 15008. 1) zpool export (all your pools except rpool) 2) install using a downloaded image of 15008 3) zpool import (all your pools except rpool) -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: It's not Camelot, but it's not Cleveland, either. -- Kevin White, Mayor of Boston -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mir at miras.org Sat Jan 11 15:00:41 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:00:41 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkg update In-Reply-To: <20140111155613.5abd7fd6@sleipner.datanom.net> References: <20140111155613.5abd7fd6@sleipner.datanom.net> Message-ID: <20140111160041.5ab20a5f@sleipner.datanom.net> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:56:13 +0100 Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:47:31 -0500 > Yuri Pismerov wrote: > > > > > As it says, it did not work. What are my options now? > > > The least painful is to reinstall with 15008. > 1) zpool export (all your pools except rpool) > 2) install using a downloaded image of 15008 > 3) zpool import (all your pools except rpool) > Arrgh. s/15008/151008/g -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: A man is like a rusty wheel on a rusty cart, He sings his song as he rattles along and then he falls apart. -- Richard Thompson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From terahz at geodar.com Sat Jan 11 19:09:07 2014 From: terahz at geodar.com (Georgi Todorov) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:09:07 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Publishers down? Message-ID: <52D196D3.2010708@geodar.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I was about to upgrade to the latest stable release but I can't seem to get to the publishers. I was set to the bloody publisher for a while and have not done updates so switched back to release: ~# pkg unset-publisher omnios ~# pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release omnios pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'omnios' do not appear to point to a valid pkg repository. Please verify the repository's location and the client's network configuration. Additional details: Unable to contact valid package repository Encountered the following error(s): Unable to contact any configured publishers. This is likely a network configuration problem. 1: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 milliseconds URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omniti-perl'. (happened 4 times) 2: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 milliseconds URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omniti-ms'. (happened 4 times) 3: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 milliseconds URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release'. (happened 4 times) ~# cat /etc/release OmniOS v11 r151007 Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Internet connection confirmation: ~# curl google.com 301 Moved

301 Moved

The document has moved here. Any ideas? Thanks, Georgi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS0ZbSAAoJEAzuUQIrkZXu/KwQAMkaxfKqMBxgDZ3VvyYNxlg5 wWpGcdDfd6XgeClMOsK3eBf29bhvALerZEQ3Dy6YySGCL4yHGz5nz+UpVbi2qBbZ 9KjOFL5mMB4B+QleaA95YKS71dxR8JF5QF6H3XEFYBiJlK3VWX5Y18PHGgaIImdv lHFKyF/k9niU7QthSDotOOCNYmItFwzxxop/bv9cJZyJmJsgg5KIZNj0wicFTFqw EpLU1/hIa+WUZB+u7Mbv7MhGjQkwIpRu4yKlGUNCzq5lXeEKTTa1yRMiMrnCf+t3 0oTe8ZnkGvAb9XiWQ36OaECSXiALzsolsi0DKlshW0f2BKvGRPDlB0z7S5VouQyN 7owTaW7SAkaIMq79hSzMKjLIQI1SEr8o4Eq7iUqpW68wSVlGg6lZDJfYj9rIIPUv aaOEvfMDV6r6dD6nLpxRtNdx9fiQv1yfyx+1M5ZOHtswt4MARVat1eC4PrbHT4rS Q6hZktevSpDPcWGTK9nL+Xo+DV0aKEQJhFs5deuwuh45ZY8ugwe237GeF7EDewNC uwwV2rMYoIR2skXyVjhLNUw8ZEnv8fyM83y0wK89+BBUVOA5ozfSS2XKk7Kjn7p2 /ncL0942yzdx0IPojSBWDBAG9eFlwvbypu8V5ns5ANPMSu9e7yp/TEJ0dFMqV8Z9 3WNgmQuLP7YhYymP9Fxb =I9l9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mark at omniti.com Sun Jan 12 00:02:23 2014 From: mark at omniti.com (Mark Harrison) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:02:23 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Publishers down? In-Reply-To: <52D196D3.2010708@geodar.com> References: <52D196D3.2010708@geodar.com> Message-ID: What does pkg.omniti.com resolve to for you? A little while ago the IP address changed and it's possible you're still trying to connect to the old server. The correct IP is 199.15.226.221. On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Georgi Todorov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I was about to upgrade to the latest stable release but I can't seem > to get to the publishers. I was set to the bloody publisher for a > while and have not done updates so switched back to release: > > ~# pkg unset-publisher omnios > ~# pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release omnios > pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'omnios' do not appear to point > to a valid pkg repository. > Please verify the repository's location and the client's network > configuration. > Additional details: > > Unable to contact valid package repository > Encountered the following error(s): > Unable to contact any configured publishers. > This is likely a network configuration problem. > 1: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 > milliseconds > URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omniti-perl'. (happened 4 times) > 2: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 > milliseconds > URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omniti-ms'. (happened 4 times) > 3: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Connection timed out after 60000 > milliseconds > URL: 'http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release'. (happened 4 times) > > > ~# cat /etc/release > OmniOS v11 r151007 > Copyright 2013 OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. > > Internet connection confirmation: > ~# curl google.com > content="text/html;charset=utf-8"> > 301 Moved >

301 Moved

> The document has moved > here. > > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Georgi > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS0ZbSAAoJEAzuUQIrkZXu/KwQAMkaxfKqMBxgDZ3VvyYNxlg5 > wWpGcdDfd6XgeClMOsK3eBf29bhvALerZEQ3Dy6YySGCL4yHGz5nz+UpVbi2qBbZ > 9KjOFL5mMB4B+QleaA95YKS71dxR8JF5QF6H3XEFYBiJlK3VWX5Y18PHGgaIImdv > lHFKyF/k9niU7QthSDotOOCNYmItFwzxxop/bv9cJZyJmJsgg5KIZNj0wicFTFqw > EpLU1/hIa+WUZB+u7Mbv7MhGjQkwIpRu4yKlGUNCzq5lXeEKTTa1yRMiMrnCf+t3 > 0oTe8ZnkGvAb9XiWQ36OaECSXiALzsolsi0DKlshW0f2BKvGRPDlB0z7S5VouQyN > 7owTaW7SAkaIMq79hSzMKjLIQI1SEr8o4Eq7iUqpW68wSVlGg6lZDJfYj9rIIPUv > aaOEvfMDV6r6dD6nLpxRtNdx9fiQv1yfyx+1M5ZOHtswt4MARVat1eC4PrbHT4rS > Q6hZktevSpDPcWGTK9nL+Xo+DV0aKEQJhFs5deuwuh45ZY8ugwe237GeF7EDewNC > uwwV2rMYoIR2skXyVjhLNUw8ZEnv8fyM83y0wK89+BBUVOA5ozfSS2XKk7Kjn7p2 > /ncL0942yzdx0IPojSBWDBAG9eFlwvbypu8V5ns5ANPMSu9e7yp/TEJ0dFMqV8Z9 > 3WNgmQuLP7YhYymP9Fxb > =I9l9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- Mark Harrison Lead Site Reliability Engineer OmniTI From terahz at geodar.com Sun Jan 12 06:20:08 2014 From: terahz at geodar.com (Georgi Todorov) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:20:08 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Publishers down? In-Reply-To: References: <52D196D3.2010708@geodar.com> Message-ID: <52D23418.40900@geodar.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/11/14 7:02 PM, Mark Harrison wrote: > What does pkg.omniti.com resolve to for you? A little while ago the > IP address changed and it's possible you're still trying to connect > to the old server. The correct IP is 199.15.226.221. That was it, thanks! > pkg.omniti.com Server: 192.168.1.1 Address: 192.168.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: pkg.omniti.com Address: 66.225.209.50 > server 8.8.8.8 Default server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 > pkg.omniti.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: pkg.omniti.com Address: 199.15.226.221 Georgi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS0jQXAAoJEAzuUQIrkZXuU7oQAOXQy9nFjwfeKhKZ2s1rTy/7 VoCwbfaBn8kKODkOhpy8m+lrOf4yis4tG9NPKSNsOJxqtV75KyWPX8DggJVmwDBF b0k0rJHWSk2RxGzORLWRwcR512mfgbbJc3L9mwgkKlCDaCc6N/ZkzzsjW6/0Tm2a /182+FntfWosAYobs0omYFBq8d3iJm4eat2miI7/nhmUamtS/R1UOv9AOSWjX362 dNq4aGedk7PiVmfhq4lgWzXzgluVZ/CG+hpZtyXdcH/I7H9sG18LLV02R0+XviwA 91tdd3p6wcj7VFaILsEAJ1VNzt/8uZ0uNw2dON8ftOWwhJxH4T5oOF0JnXpsJQ3I cm/j5oB6DBXlFZ+B0lpn16madY/Wlq0a8Tw8YVpEtdSI2Zt8nKRe+5R5A9VJK4mV lfZ6Q3tTUO7JO38qLXU+TZKwsUqsWYPsHQ2kask0PJGh2kETmL1UE2FZ64iW5b7F RfwtnnOlf3qoAOrDInSrqdjSPFY7eLJynbPO2utDNL4nPF68uxAqkVLV/37o+EbT Yvz+ZNV1YlzUk8AZY3/c+thtQdi77EwwGRYUwMzgCsGmcGa2VYpsVI7n0HtqFGHn h1ZdaEgoa06MSIz19LPOKPO9diqVztVNPUeqtqTX8gzKpy+rthVBmylX8fA9w0NS vjdfzq87RKaxfOw1z6lE =3BVA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From svavar at fiton.is Sun Jan 12 14:46:53 2014 From: svavar at fiton.is (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Svavar_=D6rn_Eysteinsson?=) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:46:53 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Not a UFS magic Number... Boot OmniOS installation on new Supermicro X10SAE Message-ID: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> Hello. I'm currently trying to install OmniOS on a brand new server. Using the latest OmniOS build on USB stick with a SuperMicro X10SAE motherboard, and a XEON CPU. When I have no SATA disk connected to the Intel SATA controller the installation boots up fine. As soon as I plug a disk into the controller, it gives me the following errors at boot : Probing for device nodes? Preparing image for use NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x0) NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) Requesting System Maintenance Mode Console login services cannot run. Enter username for system maintenance?. My SATA disk is empty. Does anyone know what the hell is going on ? Are there any BOOT options on OmniOS installation? Can't find any information regarding boot options. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks allot people. Best regards, Svavar Reykjavik - Iceland From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Sun Jan 12 14:54:03 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:54:03 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Not a UFS magic Number... Boot OmniOS installation on new Supermicro X10SAE In-Reply-To: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> References: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> Message-ID: <52D2AC8B.4060700@gmail.com> On 1/12/14, 2:46 PM, Svavar ?rn Eysteinsson wrote: > Hello. > > I'm currently trying to install OmniOS on a brand new server. > Using the latest OmniOS build on USB stick with a SuperMicro X10SAE motherboard, and a XEON CPU. > > When I have no SATA disk connected to the Intel SATA controller the installation boots up fine. > > As soon as I plug a disk into the controller, it gives me the following errors at boot : > > > Probing for device nodes? > Preparing image for use > NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) > NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) > NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x0) > NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) > Requesting System Maintenance Mode > Console login services cannot run. > > Enter username for system maintenance?. > > > My SATA disk is empty. > > Does anyone know what the hell is going on ? > Are there any BOOT options on OmniOS installation? Can't find any information regarding boot options. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > Thanks allot people. Can you try dd'ing over the disk with zeros and trying again? -- Saso From svavar at fiton.is Sun Jan 12 15:03:25 2014 From: svavar at fiton.is (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Svavar_=D6rn_Eysteinsson?=) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:03:25 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Not a UFS magic Number... Boot OmniOS installation on new Supermicro X10SAE In-Reply-To: <52D2AC8B.4060700@gmail.com> References: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> <52D2AC8B.4060700@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6284EAE6-BF4A-4311-A153-2B441F75F199@fiton.is> Well, I've changed the disk from a brand new one, just opened it up from a static bag inserted it, and the exact same error messages?. :S so two disks, no boot?. On 12.1.2014, at 14:54, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 1/12/14, 2:46 PM, Svavar ?rn Eysteinsson wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I'm currently trying to install OmniOS on a brand new server. >> Using the latest OmniOS build on USB stick with a SuperMicro X10SAE motherboard, and a XEON CPU. >> >> When I have no SATA disk connected to the Intel SATA controller the installation boots up fine. >> >> As soon as I plug a disk into the controller, it gives me the following errors at boot : >> >> >> Probing for device nodes? >> Preparing image for use >> NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) >> NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) >> NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x0) >> NOTICE : mount: not a UFS magic number (0x1c798c2e) >> Requesting System Maintenance Mode >> Console login services cannot run. >> >> Enter username for system maintenance?. >> >> >> My SATA disk is empty. >> >> Does anyone know what the hell is going on ? >> Are there any BOOT options on OmniOS installation? Can't find any information regarding boot options. >> >> Any help would be much appreciated. >> >> Thanks allot people. > > Can you try dd'ing over the disk with zeros and trying again? > > -- > Saso > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Sun Jan 12 15:05:16 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:05:16 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Not a UFS magic Number... Boot OmniOS installation on new Supermicro X10SAE In-Reply-To: <6284EAE6-BF4A-4311-A153-2B441F75F199@fiton.is> References: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> <52D2AC8B.4060700@gmail.com> <6284EAE6-BF4A-4311-A153-2B441F75F199@fiton.is> Message-ID: <52D2AF2C.4060400@gmail.com> On 1/12/14, 3:03 PM, Svavar ?rn Eysteinsson wrote: > Well, I've changed the disk from a brand new one, just opened it up from a static bag > inserted it, and the exact same error messages?. > > :S > > so two disks, no boot?. It's not that I think that the disks would be bad, it's that maybe there's something written on there that the kernel is misinterpreting as being a UFS filesystem. If you zero out the initial portions of the disk, then we know that there's just zeros there, and we will know to look somewhere else. -- Saso From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Sun Jan 12 15:08:50 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:08:50 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Not a UFS magic Number... Boot OmniOS installation on new Supermicro X10SAE In-Reply-To: <6284EAE6-BF4A-4311-A153-2B441F75F199@fiton.is> References: <81DE9068-F8D0-4A78-ADD0-B0EB8EA19C0F@fiton.is> <52D2AC8B.4060700@gmail.com> <6284EAE6-BF4A-4311-A153-2B441F75F199@fiton.is> Message-ID: <52D2B002.3020506@gmail.com> On 1/12/14, 3:03 PM, Svavar ?rn Eysteinsson wrote: > Well, I've changed the disk from a brand new one, just opened it up from a static bag > inserted it, and the exact same error messages?. > > :S > > so two disks, no boot?. Scrap what I said earlier. I think I understand what the problem is. The mount scripts on the installer USB are confusing the USB disk with the SATA drive and are trying to mount the SATA disk as the installer root. This is obviously a bug in the install image, but you should be able to work around it by booting from an ISO (that motherboard should have a on-board IP KVM with media redirection, so you can use that if you don't want to burn install media). Cheers, -- Saso From terahz at geodar.com Sun Jan 12 15:54:30 2014 From: terahz at geodar.com (Georgi Todorov) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:54:30 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkg update Message-ID: <52D2BAB6.2060800@geodar.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:56:13 +0100 Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:47:31 -0500 Yuri Pismerov gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> As it says, it did not work. What are my options now? >> > The least painful is to reinstall with 15008. 1) zpool export (all > your pools except rpool) 2) install using a downloaded image of > 15008 3) zpool import (all your pools except rpool) I just hit the same problem after moving the the new release from bloody. # pkg update -nv Creating Plan \ pkg update: The certificate which issued this certificate:/C=US/ST=Maryland/O=OmniTI/OU=OmniOS/CN=OmniOS r151008 Release Signing Certificate/emailAddress=omnios-support at omniti.com could not be found. The issuer is:/C=US/ST=Maryland/L=Fulton/O=OmniTI/CN=OmniTI Certificate Authority The package involved is:pkg://omnios/library/libtool/libltdl at 2.4.2,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024209Z I can't afford to do a fresh reinstall. Can I put the required certs in /etc/ssl/pkg and run pkg set-property trust-anchor-directory etc/ssl/pkg? If yes, where do I get the right CA from ? What are the other options do I have? Thanks! Georgi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS0rq2AAoJEAzuUQIrkZXuqLkP+wT8lwY20bDLUvPxatVm78go Abn0OYHvh531lyS0XtGLccNRQXWNGTIqpXvh22S9C09J9VLPQyKrbxn6BJPFHvjn nFJUZ4NbcaY+VwP7OH3dLnGPKR/DVJF1RO25D/PTf93LpTjyNCEKxLe+NBc68Yp1 jLxDDKmYYKeN7uQgGK5PLro4y6hwBxajwP+2gA9DLiWuyQ0yeram7G+ZtHeJhthy OTvrsG27rmx3y3UsaILZ0ci1qq8fKfA8d+T3bQY+sURdeY5fNjoF8mKNlwub7vrO dZ+io5PSVU43H7ymhGm/0o5glmKibZh8XJbIdSXVL7dz7L/0MQu09UdXlaP2IbNy s5FyKJowsnYJ291mjsWSjmBtrwV6fEMWhVwv8GznqSj+Pb7ede4sFR/u3LzHe1iz kOn+6QGGhZ1be9sXAfThAVe3hXZGGrMjl3D0aJ4GES6/I64/WYhBCa1TrSWSnWI/ I7arxw+pceLs28sUTAAE2hTUWETYquke6jiy5UMXeMSCOtLBvSa2aRHbXApRF88m 0W6YGQedhHjgh3vQ5nC1nQOppyP26maXwHOBkB/Yj6hpTfMq8xZlv5V6VOMgRVfC ISHQKJYRtWhiEDQ4wVJWvTrJplHEZcjJjHnXVLz5O4PIq3PQ7ZH6JiEMVoAwMCOO NFS9UyAnwccVzJjP5e/Y =8YOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From cj.keist at colostate.edu Mon Jan 13 21:52:43 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:52:43 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> Message-ID: <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> Thank you! That did the trick. Next issue I have run into is that I cannot get the OS to see the network. Followed the instructions here: http://omnios.omniti.com/wiki.php/GeneralAdministration Everything went through as stated in the instructions. My device is e1000g0, route was added and IP/netmask/broadcast are all correct. But no access to the network. Any suggestions? On 1/10/14, 4:56 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:57:31 -0700 > CJ Keist wrote: > >> >> Setup: >> Memory: 4gb >> Processors 4(1 socket, 4cores)[qemu64] >> hard disk(ide0) format vmdk, cache=writethrough size=12gb >> Network Device(net0) e1000 bridge=vmbr0 >> > Omnios does not handle cores, only sockets. So do this instead: > Processors 4(4 socket, 1cores)[qemu64] > > And for performance: > hard disk(sata0) format qcow2, cache=none size=12gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' From mir at miras.org Mon Jan 13 21:59:06 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:59:06 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:52:43 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > Everything went through as stated in the instructions. My device is e1000g0, route was added and IP/netmask/broadcast are all correct. But no access to the network. > > Any suggestions? > what does netstat -rn show? -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Hors d'oeuvres -- a ham sandwich cut into forty pieces. -- Jack Benny -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cj.keist at colostate.edu Mon Jan 13 22:03:40 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> Message-ID: <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. On 1/13/14, 2:59 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:52:43 -0700 > CJ Keist wrote: > >> Everything went through as stated in the instructions. My device is e1000g0, route was added and IP/netmask/broadcast are all correct. But no access to the network. >> >> Any suggestions? >> > what does netstat -rn show? > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2014-01-13 at 3.01.12 PM.png Type: image/png Size: 22880 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2014-01-13 at 3.02.26 PM.png Type: image/png Size: 25230 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mir at miras.org Mon Jan 13 22:45:43 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:45:43 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. > I think you have entered wrong network data. IP 129.82.20.15 GW 129.82.20.1 BA 129.82.23.255 NW 129.82.20.0 ??? Something does not compute here. You are sure your broadcast address should not have been 129.82.20.255 instead of 129.82.23.255? -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Aliquid melius quam pessimum optimum non est. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cj.keist at colostate.edu Mon Jan 13 23:02:19 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:02:19 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> Message-ID: <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Michael, Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for the broadcast. The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). On 1/13/14, 3:45 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 > CJ Keist wrote: > >> Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. >> > I think you have entered wrong network data. > IP 129.82.20.15 > GW 129.82.20.1 > BA 129.82.23.255 > NW 129.82.20.0 ??? > > Something does not compute here. You are sure your broadcast address > should not have been 129.82.20.255 instead of 129.82.23.255? > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' From ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu Mon Jan 13 23:21:07 2014 From: ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu (Ian Kaufman) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:21:07 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: If the subnet mask is 255.255.252.0, the broadcast should be 129.82.31.255. Ian On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:02 PM, CJ Keist wrote: > Michael, > Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for > the broadcast. > The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with > other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). > > > > On 1/13/14, 3:45 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: >> >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 >> CJ Keist wrote: >> >>> Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through >>> the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. >>> >> I think you have entered wrong network data. >> IP 129.82.20.15 >> GW 129.82.20.1 >> BA 129.82.23.255 >> NW 129.82.20.0 ??? >> >> Something does not compute here. You are sure your broadcast address >> should not have been 129.82.20.255 instead of 129.82.23.255? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >> > > -- > C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu > Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) > Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 > College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 > Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 > > All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- Ian Kaufman Research Systems Administrator UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu From mir at miras.org Mon Jan 13 23:22:59 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:22:59 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140114002259.3b9c733a@sleipner.datanom.net> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:02:19 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > Michael, > Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for the broadcast. > The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). > You have this network - 129.82.20.0/22 ? It looks as no traffic is going through the default route. Is it a vlan issue? How is your switch port configured? -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Monotheism is a gift from the gods. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mir at miras.org Mon Jan 13 23:33:36 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:33:36 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140114003336.79ef8263@sleipner.datanom.net> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:02:19 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > Michael, > Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for the broadcast. > The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). > Ahh, now I know want is wrong. You need to upgrade to latest proxmox and choose OS Type 'Solaris'. If this is not possible you will have to change cpu parameters in the start script from -cpu qemu64,+x2apic to -cpu qemu64,-x2apic ps -ef |grep on your proxmox host will show you the complete opstart parameters which you can simply copy and paste and remember to change the cpu parameters. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Employees must wash hands before returning to work. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cj.keist at colostate.edu Mon Jan 13 23:35:02 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:35:02 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <52D47826.4010003@colostate.edu> Nope, 255.255.252.0/22 is 1022 host sub-net. On 1/13/14, 4:21 PM, Ian Kaufman wrote: > If the subnet mask is 255.255.252.0, the broadcast should be 129.82.31.255. > > Ian > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:02 PM, CJ Keist wrote: >> Michael, >> Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for >> the broadcast. >> The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with >> other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). >> >> >> >> On 1/13/14, 3:45 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 >>> CJ Keist wrote: >>> >>>> Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through >>>> the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. >>>> >>> I think you have entered wrong network data. >>> IP 129.82.20.15 >>> GW 129.82.20.1 >>> BA 129.82.23.255 >>> NW 129.82.20.0 ??? >>> >>> Something does not compute here. You are sure your broadcast address >>> should not have been 129.82.20.255 instead of 129.82.23.255? >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >>> >> >> -- >> C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu >> Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) >> Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 >> College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 >> Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 >> >> All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > > -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' From ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu Mon Jan 13 23:38:59 2014 From: ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu (Ian Kaufman) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:38:59 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D47826.4010003@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> <52D47826.4010003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: Oops, yup, my bad. For some reason, I was using 129.82.29.15 as the host ... Ian On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:35 PM, CJ Keist wrote: > Nope, > 255.255.252.0/22 is 1022 host sub-net. > > > > > On 1/13/14, 4:21 PM, Ian Kaufman wrote: >> >> If the subnet mask is 255.255.252.0, the broadcast should be >> 129.82.31.255. >> >> Ian >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:02 PM, CJ Keist wrote: >>> >>> Michael, >>> Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct >>> for >>> the broadcast. >>> The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with >>> other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/13/14, 3:45 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0700 >>>> CJ Keist wrote: >>>> >>>>> Excuse the pics, but don't have cut paste ability while working through >>>>> the java console. Here is all the network info I believe. >>>>> >>>> I think you have entered wrong network data. >>>> IP 129.82.20.15 >>>> GW 129.82.20.1 >>>> BA 129.82.23.255 >>>> NW 129.82.20.0 ??? >>>> >>>> Something does not compute here. You are sure your broadcast address >>>> should not have been 129.82.20.255 instead of 129.82.23.255? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu >>> Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) >>> Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 >>> College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 >>> Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 >>> >>> All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >> >> >> >> > > -- > C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu > Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) > Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 > College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 > Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 > > All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' -- Ian Kaufman Research Systems Administrator UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu From mir at miras.org Mon Jan 13 23:42:03 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:42:03 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140114004203.3e6803fc@sleipner.datanom.net> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:21:07 -0800 Ian Kaufman wrote: > If the subnet mask is 255.255.252.0, the broadcast should be 129.82.31.255. > If it is CIDR notation 129.82.20.0/22 the broadcast is 129.82.23.255 as stated. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Anything is good if it's made of chocolate. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ypismerov at gmail.com Tue Jan 14 11:12:09 2014 From: ypismerov at gmail.com (Yuri Pismerov) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:12:09 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Time Machine volume via dns-ds Message-ID: Hello everybody. I?ve been trying to set up proper announcement of a Time Machine volume, but I failed so far. Has anybody managed to do it? Could you provide an example of dns-ds commands? TIA. From bdha at mirrorshades.net Tue Jan 14 12:10:32 2014 From: bdha at mirrorshades.net (Bryan Horstmann-Allen) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:10:32 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Zone "lost" its IP, was then bound to global zone Message-ID: <20140114121032.GA28704@lab.pobox.com> The global zone: # grep network /etc/zones/icg_mx.xml igb1:16: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet a.b.c.96 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 208.72.237.255 Note the lack of a "zone: icg_mx" field in that alias output. The zone: # ifconfig -a lo0:14: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 lo0:14: flags=2002000849 mtu 8252 index 1 inet6 ::1/128 Any connections to a.b.c.96 went to the global zone instead of the zone itself. How I "fixed" it: # ifconfig igb1:16 down # ifconfig igb1:16 unplumb # zoneadm -z icg_mx reboot In 7 years of heavy zone usage, I've never seen anything like this. This caused about 11 hours of internal automated mail (systems, sev2 monitoring, cron, etc) -- thankfully just that -- to bounce, since it was all going to the gz, instead of the zone. To put it _very_ mildly, this is _really_ concerning. No humans were logged into the machine when this occurred. The config mgmt daemon was disabled. I'm going by when mail stopped being accepts on the ngz; which was still running... just missing its IP. No useful logs to syslog, SMF, etc. Has anyone run into this? -- bdha cyberpunk is dead. long live cyberpunk. From smd at mis.use.net Tue Jan 14 15:54:21 2014 From: smd at mis.use.net (Sean Doran) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:54:21 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j Message-ID: Firstly, on: http://omnios.omniti.com/wiki.php/Installation#Fromthenetwork ? Current stable: http://omnios.omniti.com/media/r151008j.zfs.bz2 md5 (kayak_r151008j.zfs.bz2) = 1c0060a51004f486343e1bc43d637c2c sha1 (kayak_r151008j.zfs.bz2) = ffef3d56815b20be215f0170cc98617fda6b9657 The URL is wrong (and produces a 404 error). It should be ?http://omnios.omniti.com/media/kayak_r151008j.zfs.bz2?; the filenames in the grey checksum box are correct. Secondly, the miniroot in pkg://omnios/system/install/kayak-kernel has a couple of problems. * curl fails because there is no /usr/lib/{32,64,amd64/libidn.so.11.6.11 * curl also fails because there is no /usr/lib/{32,64,amd64}/libz.so.1.2.8 Thirdly, the miniroot?s /kayak/disk_help.sh will bomb at line 124: log "Creating rpool with: zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt" zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt || bomb "Failed to create rpool? because zpool create complains about not being able to share rpool in the absence of shareadm(1M). Copying the missing shared libraries to the miniroot and working around the zpool exit status (all changes made via mount -o nologging `lofiadm -a miniroot` /mnt/t; {cp ...,vi,?} /mnt/t/...), a kayak installation following the online docs appears to complete successfully. Sean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bdha at mirrorshades.net Tue Jan 14 16:05:24 2014 From: bdha at mirrorshades.net (Bryan Horstmann-Allen) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:05:24 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Zone "lost" its IP, was then bound to global zone In-Reply-To: <20140114121032.GA28704@lab.pobox.com> References: <20140114121032.GA28704@lab.pobox.com> Message-ID: <20140114160524.GB15458@lab.pobox.com> Further investigation when I wasn't covered in three small children wanting breakfast definitely suggests this was operator error. Sorry for the noise. -- bdha cyberpunk is dead. long live cyberpunk. From smd at mis.use.net Tue Jan 14 16:18:03 2014 From: smd at mis.use.net (Sean Doran) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:18:03 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] zoneadm install on clean install vs on r151008 with a bit of history Message-ID: I can install (and detach, and export) a nonglobal zone on a completely new fresh install of r151008j. The detached zone attaches and boots fine on my r151008j (and -f) systems which have been running for a couple of months and which started at 151006 and were likely munged in dealing with the -6 to -8 upgrade. A zoneadm install on these running systems results in: - ? DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) Completed 375/375 33113/33113 252.3/252.3 PHASE ACTIONS Install Phase 43997/54841Action install failed for 'usr/share/lib/nterm/tab.300s' (pkg://omnios/text/doctools): ActionExecutionError: Requested operation failed for package pkg://omnios/text/doctools at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T025157Z: Unable to create hard link [path]/root/usr/share/lib/nterm/tab.300s; target [path]/root/usr/share/lib/nterm/tab.300S is missing. pkg: Requested operation failed for package pkg://omnios/text/doctools at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T025157Z: Unable to create hard link [path]/root/usr/share/lib/nterm/tab.300s; target [path]/samba/root/usr/share/lib/nterm/tab.300S is missing. ERROR: failed to install package - ? I can?t figure out how to fix this, and would appreciate anyone?s advice, particularly to avoid future trouble. Sean. P.S. that pkg supports $http_proxy is nice. A http cache in front of several pkg installs says: Hits as % of all requests: 5min: 99.9%, 60min: 95.4% Hits as % of bytes sent: 5min: 100.0%, 60min: 89.8% saving lots of time and on-the-wire traffic. I did check that the cache is not a factor in the error. From cks at cs.toronto.edu Tue Jan 14 22:02:11 2014 From: cks at cs.toronto.edu (Chris Siebenmann) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:02:11 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] What are people using as a source of additional packages currently? Message-ID: <20140114220211.78CB41A0D11@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> When I tested and experimented with OmniOS last year, I used pkgsrc.org as a general source of additional packages. However it currently seems to be fairly non-functional on OmniOS (or in general, eg its install instructions point to things that don't exist right now). Is there some generally recommended alternative to pkgsrc, or is the recommendation to build everything you want yourself? (Possibly from the pkgsrc source base.) - cks From lotheac at iki.fi Wed Jan 15 12:30:26 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:30:26 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Tue, Jan 14 2014 15:54:21 +0000, Sean Doran wrote: > Thirdly, the miniroot?s /kayak/disk_help.sh will bomb at line 124: > > log "Creating rpool with: zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt" > zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt || bomb "Failed to create rpool? > > because zpool create complains about not being able to share rpool in the absence of shareadm(1M). I'm currently building a kayak miniroot of my own due to needing to include a non-redistributable NIC driver and also ran into this. The root cause is that libshare needs libxml2, which is dropped from the miniroot: in the kayak repo data/access.log includes a libxml2.so.2.9.0, but the current version is libxml2.so.2.9.1 and that gets dropped. I don't know how this 'access.log' was generated, but I'm thinking it should be regenerated :) -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From jesus at omniti.com Wed Jan 15 14:24:48 2014 From: jesus at omniti.com (Theo Schlossnagle) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:24:48 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: patches welcome. The access.log is generated via the anonymous dtrace script: anon.dtrace.conf (check the makefile for more info). The method isn't perfect, but it gets a ton of low hanging fruit. Any additional stuff can just be manually added to a data file (I'd suggest data/known_extras). The build_image.sh script just does: load_keep_list data/* to pull in a list of files to not delete from the miniroot. Should be simple enough to add in all the files that need to be there. Also, someone is welcome to try to run a new install with the anonymous dtrace function and catch the access.log. It's a bit more work, but it hasn't been done since 151002. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14 2014 15:54:21 +0000, Sean Doran wrote: > > Thirdly, the miniroot?s /kayak/disk_help.sh will bomb at line 124: > > > > log "Creating rpool with: zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt" > > zpool create -f rpool $ztype $ztgt || bomb "Failed to create rpool? > > > > because zpool create complains about not being able to share rpool in > the absence of shareadm(1M). > > I'm currently building a kayak miniroot of my own due to needing to > include a non-redistributable NIC driver and also ran into this. The > root cause is that libshare needs libxml2, which is dropped from the > miniroot: in the kayak repo data/access.log includes a libxml2.so.2.9.0, > but the current version is libxml2.so.2.9.1 and that gets dropped. I > don't know how this 'access.log' was generated, but I'm thinking it > should be regenerated :) > > -- > Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- Theo Schlossnagle http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cj.keist at colostate.edu Wed Jan 15 17:47:11 2014 From: cj.keist at colostate.edu (CJ Keist) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:47:11 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <20140114003336.79ef8263@sleipner.datanom.net> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> <20140114003336.79ef8263@sleipner.datanom.net> Message-ID: <52D6C99F.2000809@colostate.edu> Michael, Thank you very much! That was the issue. After upgrading my Proxmox to the latest release network is working now. It looks like the Solaris network issue started with the move from pve-manger 3.0 to 3.1. On 1/13/14, 4:33 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:02:19 -0700 > CJ Keist wrote: > >> Michael, >> Broadcast is set right (255.255.252.0) so 129.82.23.255 is correct for the broadcast. >> The 129.82.20.0 129.82.20.15 in the route table is consistent with other Solaris servers I have on the network (non-virtual). >> > Ahh, now I know want is wrong. You need to upgrade to latest proxmox > and choose OS Type 'Solaris'. > > If this is not possible you will have to change cpu parameters in the > start script from -cpu qemu64,+x2apic to -cpu qemu64,-x2apic > > ps -ef |grep on your proxmox host will show > you the complete opstart parameters which you can simply copy and paste > and remember to change the cpu parameters. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist at colostate.edu Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI) Engineering Network Services Phone: 970-491-0630 College of Engineering, CSU Fax: 970-491-5569 Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' From mir at miras.org Wed Jan 15 18:02:19 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:02:19 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Newbie to OmniOS In-Reply-To: <52D6C99F.2000809@colostate.edu> References: <52D05EBB.8070802@colostate.edu> <20140111005645.7f9af583@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4602B.1030706@colostate.edu> <20140113225906.4c40207b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D462BC.8060008@colostate.edu> <20140113234543.3c1d732b@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D4707B.5020003@colostate.edu> <20140114003336.79ef8263@sleipner.datanom.net> <52D6C99F.2000809@colostate.edu> Message-ID: <20140115190219.79ba193c@sleipner.datanom.net> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:47:11 -0700 CJ Keist wrote: > Michael, > Thank you very much! That was the issue. After upgrading my Proxmox to the latest release network is working now. It looks like the Solaris network issue started with the move from pve-manger 3.0 to 3.1. > It was not the Proxmox version in itself it was the new version of KVM and the prior used cpu options which in combination triggered a regression. Whether Omnios/Illumos is to blame or it is KVM is currently unknown. But as long as it works I am less tempted to pursue an answer to the question;-) -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: ...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly). -- Matt Welsh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ngoossens at gmail.com Wed Jan 15 21:43:43 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:43:43 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: An update on the hangs that are occurring on my OmniOS install. First of all, it takes up to a day for a hang to occur, so that explains why it took some time for me to post this update.. First I removed the second ethernet card. This had no effect, the machine still hangs. After that I ran memtest+ for a few hours: no errors were found. Finally, I filled the zpool with /dev/urandom generated files, then started scrub. This resulted in a hang shortly after the scrub started! After a reboot scrub does complete with no errors (scan: scrub repaired 24K in 2h36m with 0 errors). Iostat -E shows illegal requests. I have a Supermicro (X9SCM-F) motherboard with 6 sata ports, out of which 1 is used for the boot drive and the other 5 are used for a 5x1tb zfs1 pool. All show pretty much the same amount of illegal requests: # iostat -E | grep Illegal Illegal Request: 54 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 Illegal Request: 53 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 Illegal Request: 53 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 Illegal Request: 53 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 Illegal Request: 53 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 Illegal Request: 52 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 This leads me to believe there is an issue with the onboard SATA controller - before I started the scrub I had 5 illegal requests... I also managed to find something remarkably similar on the SmartOS mailing list ( http://www.kdump.cn/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=3519). These illegal requests started appearing recently, and the only thing I?ve done is upgrade to OmniOS r151008 (from r151006). Now this could be pure coincidence, so my next step is install r151006 and just test, I guess. What would be the best way to downgrade from 151008 to 151006? Niels Goossens -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mir at miras.org Wed Jan 15 21:56:04 2014 From: mir at miras.org (Michael Rasmussen) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:56:04 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140115225604.1ab487b0@sleipner.datanom.net> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:43:43 +0100 Niels Goossens wrote: > > What would be the best way to downgrade from 151008 to 151006? > If you have updated your pool there is no turning back. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated. -- Poul Anderson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ngoossens at gmail.com Wed Jan 15 22:30:44 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:30:44 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: >* If you have updated your pool there is no turning back.* I did not update the pool yet. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From esproul at omniti.com Wed Jan 15 22:48:43 2014 From: esproul at omniti.com (Eric Sproul) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:48:43 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Niels Goossens wrote: > >> If you have updated your pool there is no turning back. > > I did not update the pool yet. If you upgraded from r151006, you should have a previous boot environment to roll back to. See beadm(1M). From alka at hfg-gmuend.de Wed Jan 15 23:26:55 2014 From: alka at hfg-gmuend.de (alka) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:26:55 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] What are people using as a source of additional packages currently? In-Reply-To: <20140114220211.78CB41A0D11@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> References: <20140114220211.78CB41A0D11@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> Message-ID: I use the pkgsrc repo from SmartOS as well as they are far more complete and up to date than any OmniOS repo and they work for OI as well. They are quite universal for Illumos based systems (mostly) see http://www.napp-it.org/downloads/binaries_en.html Gea napp-it.org Am 14.01.2014 um 23:02 schrieb Chris Siebenmann: > When I tested and experimented with OmniOS last year, I used pkgsrc.org > as a general source of additional packages. However it currently seems > to be fairly non-functional on OmniOS (or in general, eg its install > instructions point to things that don't exist right now). > > Is there some generally recommended alternative to pkgsrc, or is > the recommendation to build everything you want yourself? > (Possibly from the pkgsrc source base.) > > - cks > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- From ngoossens at gmail.com Thu Jan 16 22:02:13 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:02:13 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: Today I used beadm to boot 151006, scrubbed the pool, started a few VMs.. The machine has just locked itself up again, after just a few hours of uptime. After scrubbing I immediately saw Illegal requests with iostat, just like when I was running 151008. I'm starting to run out of options... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dseira at stackscale.com Fri Jan 17 13:13:30 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:13:30 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge Message-ID: Hi list, I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? Thanks. -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frederic.alix at fredalix.com Fri Jan 17 13:22:32 2014 From: frederic.alix at fredalix.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Alix?=) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:22:32 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, What is your RAID controller ? H710 or H810 ? 2014/1/17 David Seira > Hi list, > > I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select > the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly > stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this > with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. > > Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? > > Thanks. > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dseira at stackscale.com Fri Jan 17 13:28:45 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:28:45 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Fr?d?ric, I'm not sure but for testing purpose there is only one 1TB disk without RAID. Regards, David 2014/1/17 Fr?d?ric Alix > Hi, > > What is your RAID controller ? H710 or H810 ? > > > 2014/1/17 David Seira > >> Hi list, >> >> I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select >> the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly >> stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this >> with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. >> >> Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frederic.alix at fredalix.com Fri Jan 17 13:36:28 2014 From: frederic.alix at fredalix.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Alix?=) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:36:28 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ok no raid, but your hd, where is it connected ? On a PCI card controller ? What is the model ? Did you try to boot in verbose mode for show more informations ? 2014/1/17 David Seira > Hi Fr?d?ric, > > I'm not sure but for testing purpose there is only one 1TB disk without > RAID. > > Regards, > David > > > 2014/1/17 Fr?d?ric Alix > >> Hi, >> >> What is your RAID controller ? H710 or H810 ? >> >> >> 2014/1/17 David Seira >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select >>> the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly >>> stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this >>> with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. >>> >>> Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >> >> > > > -- > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dseira at stackscale.com Fri Jan 17 13:55:42 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:55:42 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I don't remember the model of the pci, I have to look for it. The hard drive model is ST1000NM0033-9ZM173. Meanwhile, I've put the boot in verbose mode and the boot stops at the following line: pcieb6 is /pci at 7a,0/pci8086,3c06 at 2,2 2014/1/17 Fr?d?ric Alix > Ok no raid, but your hd, where is it connected ? > On a PCI card controller ? What is the model ? > > Did you try to boot in verbose mode for show more informations ? > > > 2014/1/17 David Seira > >> Hi Fr?d?ric, >> >> I'm not sure but for testing purpose there is only one 1TB disk without >> RAID. >> >> Regards, >> David >> >> >> 2014/1/17 Fr?d?ric Alix >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is your RAID controller ? H710 or H810 ? >>> >>> >>> 2014/1/17 David Seira >>> >>>> Hi list, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I >>>> select the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and >>>> suddenly stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've >>>> tried this with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. >>>> >>>> Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danmcd at omniti.com Fri Jan 17 15:40:33 2014 From: danmcd at omniti.com (Dan McDonald) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:40:33 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <09819B90-104B-4616-8672-DAFE7A119BF1@omniti.com> On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:13 AM, David Seira wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. > > Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? Not OmniOS -> but I did install NexentaStor on a C6220 back in the old job. This was for Dell themselves, and they had it configured per Nexenta's specs. Fr?d?ric asked you which disk controller you were running. Luckily, you supplied the disk model, and ST1000NM0033-9ZM173 is a SATA disk, so you're LIKELY using the on-motherboard SATA controller (hopefully under AHCI and not SCU -- these are BIOS options, I think). You should, however, look and see if you're running one of the optional RAID controllers. Do you get any "LSI MegaRAID" text from the BIOS at boot time? Also, what other text was shown (i.e. not just the last line) before it froze? Dan From j.david.lists at gmail.com Sun Jan 19 01:52:06 2014 From: j.david.lists at gmail.com (J David) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:52:06 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Running OmniOS under KVM Message-ID: Hello all, While attempting to try out OmniOS as a KVM guest (on a Debian host), I've run into a weird snag. Unfortunately my Solaris experience dates back to when it came from a company called Sun so I'm kind of at a loss. It seems that there is some problem with the KVM VGA console. Most alphanumeric keys work fine but navigation keys, like the arrows keys or backspace, appear to auto-repeat so that e.g. one press of backspace will delete the entire line, and one press of left or right arrow will go all the way to the beginning or end of the line, respectively. This is true both before and after installation. There are a couple of different approaches that would solve this. One would be to figure out how to fix this problem. The other would be to find a way to install OmniOS from the ISO image using a serial console, which is a lot easier for us to work with anyway. This was all using the latest stable release ISO (r151008j), but when I last tried it a few months ago, it was the same. Thanks for any advice! From tobi at oetiker.ch Sun Jan 19 16:26:12 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:26:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] igb0 'hangs' Message-ID: I just had an odd thing happening to my r151008 server. It suddenly stopped communicating over its igb0 interface ... Upon further investigation I found: a) several KVM guests talking over the same physical interface were still happily chatting b) logging into the guests and trying to reach the server over that route did not work either. c) accessing the server via the hardware console revealed that it was working and did not seem to realize that igb0 was having a problem. At least dmesg did not show anyithing interesting. once I did # ipadm down-addr igb0/v4static # ipadm up-addr igb0/v4static the interface started working again ... any idea what has happened here ? cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From dswartz at druber.com Sun Jan 19 21:58:17 2014 From: dswartz at druber.com (Dan Swartzendruber) Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:58:17 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Resilver speed and record size? Message-ID: I have a pool with 3x2 mirrors. SAS nearline drives. One of them died, so I replaced it, and it resilvered overnight. Another drive is showing 40 grown defects, so I am suspicious. I want to replace it and reformat it to see if any problems crop up. So. I plugged in a new drive and did 'zpool replace tank foo bar', and it's going along just fine. Kinda slow though, compared to scrub. It started at about 5MB/sec and is now up to 13MB/sec, which is pretty slow. I've been googling and find posts various places that the resilver speed depends to some extent on record size (apologies if I am mis-stating this.) A good chunk of the data (180GB) is in a zvol serving up storage to an esxi server for virtual machine disks (zvol, so defaulting to 8K). Probably twice this is in nfs-exported shares for veeam backup (defaulting to 128K). Originally everything was nfs-shared, and I seem to recall resilvering being faster. Am I out to lunch here? Any thoughts or suggestions as to what I should do ('nothing' is a valid reply, of course) would be much appreciated. From dseira at stackscale.com Mon Jan 20 09:25:30 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:25:30 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: <09819B90-104B-4616-8672-DAFE7A119BF1@omniti.com> References: <09819B90-104B-4616-8672-DAFE7A119BF1@omniti.com> Message-ID: Hi Dan, Yes, the server uses the AHCI. There aren't any message in the boot time, directly appears the PXE options. The completely output is this: module /platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/unix: text at [0xfffffffffb800000, 0xfffffffffb94fbff] data at 0xfffffffffbc00000 module /kernel/amd64/genunix: text at [0xfffffffffb94fc00, 0xfffffffffbbd1ce7] data at 0xfffffffffbc95e80 x86_feature: lgpg x86_feature: tsc x86_feature: msr x86_feature: mtrr x86_feature: pge x86_feature: de x86_feature: cmov x86_feature: mmx x86_feature: mca x86_feature: pae x86_feature: cv8 x86_feature: pat x86_feature: sep x86_feature: sse x86_feature: sse2 x86_feature: htt x86_feature: asyc x86_feature: nx x86_feature: sse3 x86_feature: cx16 x86_feature: cmp x86_feature: tscp x86_feature: mwait x86_feature: cpuid x86_feature: ssse3 x86_feature: sse4_1 x86_feature: sse4_2 x86_feature: 1gpg x86_feature: clfsh x86_feature: 64 x86_feature: aes x86_feature: pclmulqdq x86_feature: xsave x86_feature: avx x86_feature: vmx mem = 134167160K (0x1ffce9e000) Using default device instance data SMBIOS v2.7 loaded (8321 bytes) initialized model-specific module 'cpu_ms.GenuineIntel' on chip 0 core 0 strand 0 root nexus = i86pc pseudo0 at root pseudo0 is /pseudo scsi_vhci0 at root scsi_vhci0 is /scsi_vhci Reading Intel IOMMU boot options pseudo-device: acpippm0 acpippm0 is /pseudo/acpippm at 0 pseudo-device: ppm0 ppm0 is /pseudo/ppm at 0 ramdisk0 at root ramdisk0 is /ramdisk root on /ramdisk:a fstype ufs acpinex0 at root acpinex0 is /fw acpinex: sb at 0, acpinex1 acpinex1 is /fw/sb at 0 acpinex: socket at 0, acpinex2 acpinex2 is /fw/sb at 0/socket at 0 pseudo-device: dld at 0 npe0 at root: space 0 offset 0 PCI Express-device: pci8086,1d10 at 1c, pcieb3 pcieb3 is /pci at 0,0/pci8086,1d10 at 1c PCI Express-device: pci8086,244e at 1e, pci_pci0 pci_pci0 is /pci at 0,0/pci8086,244e at 1e PCIE-device: pci1a03,1150 at 0, pcieb4 pcieb4 is /pci at 0,0/pci8086,1d10 at 1c/pci1a03,1150 at 0 npe2 at root: space 7a offset 0 npe2 is /pci at 7a,0 PCI Express-device: pci8086,3c06 at 2,2, pcieb6 pcieb6 isd /pci at 7a,0/pci8086,3c06 at 2,2 Best regards, David 2014/1/17 Dan McDonald > > On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:13 AM, David Seira wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > I'm trying to install OmniOS on a Dell PowerEdge C6220 but once I select > the omniOS option in the grub, then it loads the drivers and suddenly > stops. It seems that there are any problem with any driver. I've tried this > with the iso image and also through the pxe without any succeed. > > > > Anyone has installed OmniOS on this server? > > Not OmniOS -> but I did install NexentaStor on a C6220 back in the old > job. This was for Dell themselves, and they had it configured per > Nexenta's specs. > > Fr?d?ric asked you which disk controller you were running. Luckily, you > supplied the disk model, and ST1000NM0033-9ZM173 is a SATA disk, so you're > LIKELY using the on-motherboard SATA controller (hopefully under AHCI and > not SCU -- these are BIOS options, I think). > > You should, however, look and see if you're running one of the optional > RAID controllers. Do you get any "LSI MegaRAID" text from the BIOS at boot > time? Also, what other text was shown (i.e. not just the last line) before > it froze? > > Dan > > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sk at kram.io Mon Jan 20 10:13:33 2014 From: sk at kram.io (Steffen Kram) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:13:33 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] igb0 'hangs' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9E8F3921-72F8-40A9-A441-87A0C11A6B76@kram.io> Hi Tobi, I had a similar problem a while ago, when I was resetting the maxbw property without taking the interface down. The global zone could not communicate over that interface anymore, while the zones where all happy. Taking the interface down and up again solved my issue, too. Cheers, Steffen Am 19.01.2014 um 17:26 schrieb Tobias Oetiker : > I just had an odd thing happening to my r151008 server. It suddenly > stopped communicating over its igb0 interface ... > > Upon further investigation I found: > > a) several KVM guests talking over the same physical interface were > still happily chatting > > b) logging into the guests and trying to reach the server over that > route did not work either. > > c) accessing the server via the hardware console revealed that it > was working and did not seem to realize that igb0 was having a > problem. At least dmesg did not show anyithing interesting. > > once I did > > # ipadm down-addr igb0/v4static > # ipadm up-addr igb0/v4static > > the interface started working again ... > > any idea what has happened here ? > > cheers > tobi > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From martin at dojcak.sk Mon Jan 20 12:56:35 2014 From: martin at dojcak.sk (Martin Dojcak) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:56:35 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS HBA Brocade 815 hardware compatibilty Message-ID: <52DD1D03.2070702@dojcak.sk> Hi all, Does anyone have experience with Brocade 815, Single Port 8Gb Fibre Channel HBA card (or brocade 8XX) under OmniOS or Illumos ? The HCL of illumos does not contain a definition for brocade hardware. We want to use (buy) this card with dell PowerEdge R420. Brocade has adapter driver package for solaris 10 and 11 but at the moment we dont have brocade FC card. So it is impossible to verify installation. Thx -- Martin Doj??k From lotheac at iki.fi Mon Jan 20 15:52:40 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:52:40 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Wed, Jan 15 2014 09:24:48 -0500, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > patches welcome. > > The access.log is generated via the anonymous dtrace > script: anon.dtrace.conf (check the makefile for more info). > > Also, someone is welcome to try to run a new install with the > anonymous dtrace function and catch the access.log. It's a bit more > work, but it hasn't been done since 151002. I gave this a shot using r151006, but I might be missing something since the file grew quite a bit: data/access.log | 3869 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 2421 insertions(+), 1448 deletions(-) I just ran the installation with NO_REBOOT=1 and consumed the data with dtrace -ae in a shell afterwards. The output format generated by dtrace here also seems different from the existing access.log -- the former includes a third field (fi_mount). Maybe the dtrace script should be modified to generate matching output (and probably drop the stuff from under /mnt)? -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From lotheac at iki.fi Mon Jan 20 15:58:53 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:58:53 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <20140120155853.GB1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Mon, Jan 20 2014 17:52:40 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15 2014 09:24:48 -0500, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > > patches welcome. > > > > The access.log is generated via the anonymous dtrace > > script: anon.dtrace.conf (check the makefile for more info). > > > > Also, someone is welcome to try to run a new install with the > > anonymous dtrace function and catch the access.log. It's a bit more > > work, but it hasn't been done since 151002. > > I gave this a shot using r151006, but I might be missing something since > the file grew quite a bit: > > data/access.log | 3869 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 2421 insertions(+), 1448 deletions(-) Answering to myself - while I did check that /mnt did not account for all of the additions I didn't consider other filesystems like /proc :) % grep -c ' /$' data/access.log 1187 I will make a PR soonish but there probably needs to be separate access.log files for different releases. -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From danmcd at omniti.com Mon Jan 20 16:03:30 2014 From: danmcd at omniti.com (Dan McDonald) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:03:30 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS HBA Brocade 815 hardware compatibilty In-Reply-To: <52DD1D03.2070702@dojcak.sk> References: <52DD1D03.2070702@dojcak.sk> Message-ID: <4204E868-DFE8-4697-B9F1-FC0FDB32A46E@omniti.com> On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Martin Dojcak wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone have experience with Brocade 815, Single Port 8Gb Fibre > Channel HBA card (or brocade 8XX) under OmniOS or Illumos ? The HCL of > illumos does not contain a definition for brocade hardware. We want to > use (buy) this card with dell PowerEdge R420. Brocade has adapter driver > package for solaris 10 and 11 but at the moment we dont have brocade FC > card. So it is impossible to verify installation. It is possible the S11 binary will work with OmniOS, BUT it would be impossible for us (or any other Illumos vendor) to properly support it. I just visited the Brocade adapter site, and it seems they've sold their adapter business to QLogic. In the past (during the OpenSolaris days) QLogic had open-sourceable drivers. Perhaps they can and will do the same. Sorry I can't be of more immediate assistance, Dan From esproul at omniti.com Mon Jan 20 16:14:34 2014 From: esproul at omniti.com (Eric Sproul) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:14:34 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: <20140120155853.GB1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155853.GB1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > I will make a PR soonish but there probably needs to be separate > access.log files for different releases. Thanks for the work Lauri. In fact we should probably make release-specific branches in Kayak the way we do for illumos-omnios and omnios-build, as the files will necessarily be different as versions change (perfect example: libxml2 2.9.0/2.9.1) Once that is done, it'd be great to retrofit each branch (r151006, r151008, master) with an update generated this way. Eric From martin at dojcak.sk Mon Jan 20 16:57:28 2014 From: martin at dojcak.sk (Martin Dojcak) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:57:28 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS HBA Brocade 815 hardware compatibilty In-Reply-To: <4204E868-DFE8-4697-B9F1-FC0FDB32A46E@omniti.com> References: <52DD1D03.2070702@dojcak.sk> <4204E868-DFE8-4697-B9F1-FC0FDB32A46E@omniti.com> Message-ID: <52DD5578.2040105@dojcak.sk> Thanks Dan. I recently read news ... and yes Brocade sells network adapter bis to QLogic. There is another solution. Dell HW configurator (shop) offer also other FC cards (which fit for our purpose): 1. QLogic: QLogic (QLE)2560, Single Port 8Gb Optical Fibre Channel HBA Qlogic is supported by illumos HCL (driver qlc, QLogic Corp. ISP2532-based 8Gb Fibre Channel to PCI Express HBA). From QLE2560 datasheet card is based on controller ISP2532. 2. Emulex: Emulex LPE 12000, Single Port 8Gb Fibre Channel HBA. Emulex is also supported by HCL (driver emlxs, Emulex Corporation Saturn-X: LightPulse Fibre Channel Host Adapter). So I choose betweeen Qlogic or Emulex. On 01/20/2014 05:03 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Martin Dojcak wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Does anyone have experience with Brocade 815, Single Port 8Gb Fibre >> Channel HBA card (or brocade 8XX) under OmniOS or Illumos ? The HCL of >> illumos does not contain a definition for brocade hardware. We want to >> use (buy) this card with dell PowerEdge R420. Brocade has adapter driver >> package for solaris 10 and 11 but at the moment we dont have brocade FC >> card. So it is impossible to verify installation. > > It is possible the S11 binary will work with OmniOS, BUT it would be impossible for us (or any other Illumos vendor) to properly support it. > > I just visited the Brocade adapter site, and it seems they've sold their adapter business to QLogic. In the past (during the OpenSolaris days) QLogic had open-sourceable drivers. Perhaps they can and will do the same. > > Sorry I can't be of more immediate assistance, > Dan > -- Martin Doj??k From smd at mis.use.net Mon Jan 20 17:10:14 2014 From: smd at mis.use.net (Sean Doran) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:10:14 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155853.GB1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <33312BA8-F27D-46F6-834D-75EBBB333BFC@mis.use.net> On 20 Jan, 2014, at 16:14, Eric Sproul wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >> > Thanks for the work Lauri. In fact we should probably make > release-specific branches in Kayak the way we do for illumos-omnios > and omnios-build, as the files will necessarily be different as > versions change (perfect example: libxml2 2.9.0/2.9.1) > > Once that is done, it'd be great to retrofit each branch (r151006, > r151008, master) with an update generated this way. Neat. Incidentally, the kayak process works fine with iPXE instead of pxegrub, with one big gotcha, namely that pxegrub gunzips miniroot.gz whereas iPXE does not have that functionality (yet). The kernel can?t itself deal with a compressed miniroot and promptly crashes. Given how much better http is than tftp is in almost every way, and ditto iPXE over pxegrub, having an uncompressed miniroot (at ca. 148M rather than 44M) kicking around in /var/kayak/kayak doesn?t seem too awful. Something like this might go into tftpboot/menu.ipxe: #!ipxe set omnios-build r151008j ######## MAIN MENU ################### :start menu Welcome to iPXE's Boot Menu item item --gap -- ------------------------- Operating systems ------------------------------ item omnios-kayak Boot OmniOS (needs MAC in /var/kayak/kayak) (${omnios-build}) item --gap -- ------------------------------ Utilities --------------------------------- item shell Enter iPXE shell item reboot Reboot item item exit Exit (boot local disk) choose ?default omnios-kayak --timeout 30000 target && goto ${target} # miniroot :omnios-kayak kernel /boot/platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/unix -B install_media=http:///kayak/r151008j.zfs.bz2,install_config=http:///kayak module /kayak/miniroot boot goto start #end For chaining purposes, using ISC DHCPD: subnet x.x.x.x netmask y.y.y.y { range ? ; next-server ka.y.a.k; if exists user-class and option user-class = ?iPXE? { filename = ?menu.ipxe?; } else { filename = ?undionly.kpxe?; } } The undionly.kpxe file can be found at http://boot.ipxe.org/undionly.kpxe and goes into /tftpboot on the kayak server. The menu.ipxe above can be rewritten to use http rather than tftp. The easiest way to take advantage of that is to copy the files in the ?kernel? and ?module? lines to somewhere under /var/kayak/kayak. If one is provisioning lots of omnioses via kayak or if the kayak server is at a fair distance (round-trip-time-wise) from the systems being provisioned, it?s easily worthwhile. It?s also worthwhile if you tend to netboot other things. cf. http://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/PXE+Booting+SmartOS Finally, the rest of the kayak process remains the same, notably the need to make a configuration file in /var/kayak/kayak. Sean. From tobi at oetiker.ch Mon Jan 20 17:19:13 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:19:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] igb0 'hangs' In-Reply-To: <9E8F3921-72F8-40A9-A441-87A0C11A6B76@kram.io> References: <9E8F3921-72F8-40A9-A441-87A0C11A6B76@kram.io> Message-ID: Today Steffen Kram wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > I had a similar problem a while ago, when I was resetting the > maxbw property without taking the interface down. The global > zone could not communicate over that interface anymore, while the > zones where all happy. Taking the interface down and up again > solved my issue, too. hmmm ... I have not fiddled with the interface at all before ... I have now disabled HW flow-control ... maybe that helps cheers tobi > > Cheers, > Steffen > > Am 19.01.2014 um 17:26 schrieb Tobias Oetiker : > > > I just had an odd thing happening to my r151008 server. It suddenly > > stopped communicating over its igb0 interface ... > > > > Upon further investigation I found: > > > > a) several KVM guests talking over the same physical interface were > > still happily chatting > > > > b) logging into the guests and trying to reach the server over that > > route did not work either. > > > > c) accessing the server via the hardware console revealed that it > > was working and did not seem to realize that igb0 was having a > > problem. At least dmesg did not show anyithing interesting. > > > > once I did > > > > # ipadm down-addr igb0/v4static > > # ipadm up-addr igb0/v4static > > > > the interface started working again ... > > > > any idea what has happened here ? > > > > cheers > > tobi > > > > > > -- > > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > > _______________________________________________ > > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From frederic.alix at fredalix.com Mon Jan 20 17:32:41 2014 From: frederic.alix at fredalix.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Alix?=) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:32:41 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] igb0 'hangs' In-Reply-To: References: <9E8F3921-72F8-40A9-A441-87A0C11A6B76@kram.io> Message-ID: Perhaps iperf can help you for identify this problem. When i have this sort of failure under Solaris, i use iperf for load bandwidth and set different TCP window size. During the test, i use snoop for see at what moment the problem appear come. 2014/1/20 Tobias Oetiker > Today Steffen Kram wrote: > > > Hi Tobi, > > > > I had a similar problem a while ago, when I was resetting the > > maxbw property without taking the interface down. The global > > zone could not communicate over that interface anymore, while the > > zones where all happy. Taking the interface down and up again > > solved my issue, too. > > hmmm ... I have not fiddled with the interface at all before ... > > I have now disabled HW flow-control ... maybe that helps > > cheers > tobi > > > > > Cheers, > > Steffen > > > > Am 19.01.2014 um 17:26 schrieb Tobias Oetiker : > > > > > I just had an odd thing happening to my r151008 server. It suddenly > > > stopped communicating over its igb0 interface ... > > > > > > Upon further investigation I found: > > > > > > a) several KVM guests talking over the same physical interface were > > > still happily chatting > > > > > > b) logging into the guests and trying to reach the server over that > > > route did not work either. > > > > > > c) accessing the server via the hardware console revealed that it > > > was working and did not seem to realize that igb0 was having a > > > problem. At least dmesg did not show anyithing interesting. > > > > > > once I did > > > > > > # ipadm down-addr igb0/v4static > > > # ipadm up-addr igb0/v4static > > > > > > the interface started working again ... > > > > > > any idea what has happened here ? > > > > > > cheers > > > tobi > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > > > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > > > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > > > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > > > > > > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lotheac at iki.fi Mon Jan 20 17:33:52 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:33:52 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] kayak bugs, r151008j In-Reply-To: <33312BA8-F27D-46F6-834D-75EBBB333BFC@mis.use.net> References: <20140115123026.GA19170@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155240.GA1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <20140120155853.GB1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <33312BA8-F27D-46F6-834D-75EBBB333BFC@mis.use.net> Message-ID: <20140120173352.GC1437@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Mon, Jan 20 2014 17:10:14 +0000, Sean Doran wrote: > Incidentally, the kayak process works fine with iPXE instead of > pxegrub, with one big gotcha, namely that pxegrub gunzips miniroot.gz > whereas iPXE does not have that functionality (yet). The kernel > can?t itself deal with a compressed miniroot and promptly crashes. > > Given how much better http is than tftp is in almost every way, and > ditto iPXE over pxegrub, having an uncompressed miniroot (at ca. 148M > rather than 44M) kicking around in /var/kayak/kayak doesn?t seem too > awful. Hmm, thanks for the heads up, I might try this at some point. We are using grub2 for our netboots, which also supports http, but based on one test the implementation seems to be just as slow as tftp. -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From johan.kragsterman at capvert.se Mon Jan 20 18:12:05 2014 From: johan.kragsterman at capvert.se (Johan Kragsterman) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:12:05 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS HBA Brocade 815 hardware compatibilty In-Reply-To: <52DD5578.2040105@dojcak.sk> References: <52DD5578.2040105@dojcak.sk>, <52DD1D03.2070702@dojcak.sk> <4204E868-DFE8-4697-B9F1-FC0FDB32A46E@omniti.com> Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobi at oetiker.ch Tue Jan 21 09:04:56 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:04:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts Message-ID: Hi, we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours. any idea what could be causing this ? server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated interface. Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604535] connection1:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604656] connection1:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604661] connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604763] connection2:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 2:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048713.496478] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048717.843552] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048718.087086] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.558551] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559623] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559654] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection2:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] chers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From turbo124 at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 09:10:53 2014 From: turbo124 at gmail.com (David Bomba) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:10:53 +1100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It looks like your NFS is dropping also ( but then recovering ), so I wouldn't be pinning the problem solely on iscsi. The problem could be anywhere from the network driver all the way back to the switch/cables etc. You'll need to go through each item methodically to find the root cause. On 21/01/2014, at 8:04 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi, > > we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on > the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours. > > any idea what could be causing this ? > > server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated interface. > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604535] connection1:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604656] connection1:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604661] connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604763] connection2:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 2:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048713.496478] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048717.843552] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048718.087086] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.558551] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559623] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559654] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection2:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > > chers > tobi > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From narayan.desai at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 12:21:41 2014 From: narayan.desai at gmail.com (Narayan Desai) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:21:41 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS expander that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in iostat -En? or any drive timeout messages in the ring buffer? -nld On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi, > > we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on > the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours. > > any idea what could be causing this ? > > server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated > interface. > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604535] connection1:0: > ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last > ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604656] connection1:0: > detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604661] connection2:0: > ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last > ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604763] connection2:0: > detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 > error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 2:0 > error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048713.496478] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048717.843552] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048718.087086] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.558551] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559623] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559654] nfs: server > 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after > recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection2:0 is operational after > recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > > chers > tobi > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danmcd at omniti.com Tue Jan 21 13:58:56 2014 From: danmcd at omniti.com (Dan McDonald) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:58:56 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Narayan Desai wrote: > We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS expander that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in iostat -En? or any drive timeout messages in the ring buffer? Generally speaking --> you use a SATA drive in a SAS expander at your own risk. I used to be at Nexenta, and they would not support customers who deployed SATA drives on SAS expanders. These days, the price delta between SAS and SATA (for enterprise) is small enough to be worth it for the headaches you avoid. Dan From tobi at oetiker.ch Tue Jan 21 14:24:43 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:24:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Today Dan McDonald wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Narayan Desai wrote: > > > We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS expander that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in iostat -En? or any drive timeout messages in the ring buffer? > > Generally speaking --> you use a SATA drive in a SAS expander at > your own risk. I used to be at Nexenta, and they would not > support customers who deployed SATA drives on SAS expanders. > These days, the price delta between SAS and SATA (for enterprise) > is small enough to be worth it for the headaches you avoid. we are not using sata NOR a sas expander ... we have a bunch of sas drives directly attached to sas controller ports each ... (the ssd drives are sata but they are directly attached to individual sas ports too) we have several system setup in a similar manner, and the problem only manifests on this one ... but it is also the most busy of the bunch. cheers tobi > > Dan > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From tim at multitalents.net Tue Jan 21 19:48:44 2014 From: tim at multitalents.net (Tim Rice) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:48:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi, > > we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on > the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours. > > any idea what could be causing this ? > > server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated interface. It might be a good idea to tell the list what network cards you are using. If they are 1G cards and you are using a Cat 5e cable, do yourself a favor and replace it with a Cat 6 cable. > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604535] connection1:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604656] connection1:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604661] connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604763] connection2:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 2:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048713.496478] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048717.843552] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048718.087086] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.558551] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559623] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559654] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection2:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > > chers > tobi > -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 456-1146 tim at multitalents.net From tobi at oetiker.ch Tue Jan 21 21:48:13 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:48:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Tim, Today Tim Rice wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on > > the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours. > > > > any idea what could be causing this ? > > > > server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated interface. > > It might be a good idea to tell the list what network cards you are using. > If they are 1G cards and you are using a Cat 5e cable, do yourself a > favor and replace it with a Cat 6 cable. sure, we have intel on-board controllers 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 3584 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11 Memory at d0960000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) I/O ports at 1060 Memory at d09b0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+ Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=10 Masked- Capabilities: [a0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [e0] Vital Product Data the cable issue I have to verify ... the odd thing about this behaviour is, that there are several kvm virtual machines running on this box as well, and even when omnios goes 'offline' the kvm hosts (talking over the same physical interface) are still reachable. They themselfs can not talk to omnios either ... cheers tobi > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604535] connection1:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604656] connection1:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604661] connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5, last rx 4557604012, last ping 4557605264, now 4557606516 [kern.err] > > Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048707.604763] connection2:0: detected conn error (1011) [kern.info] > > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > > Jan 21 01:21:35 iscsi-client iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 2:0 error (1011) state (3) [daemon.warning] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048713.496478] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048717.843552] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048718.087086] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 not responding, still trying [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.558551] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559623] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:57 iscsi-client kernel: : [1048730.559654] nfs: server 10.10.10.1 OK [kern.notice] > > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > > Jan 21 01:21:59 iscsi-client iscsid: connection2:0 is operational after recovery (2 attempts) [daemon.warning] > > > > chers > > tobi > > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From narayan.desai at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 21:50:14 2014 From: narayan.desai at gmail.com (Narayan Desai) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:50:14 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry, I should have given the requisite "yes, I know that this is a recipe for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness". That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't necessarily be any sign, aside from insanely high service times on an individual device in the pool. >From this, I assume that ZFS is still sensitive to variation in underlying drive performance. Tobi, what do your drive service times look like? -nld On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Narayan Desai > wrote: > > > We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS > expander that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in > iostat -En? or any drive timeout messages in the ring buffer? > > Generally speaking --> you use a SATA drive in a SAS expander at your own > risk. I used to be at Nexenta, and they would not support customers who > deployed SATA drives on SAS expanders. These days, the price delta between > SAS and SATA (for enterprise) is small enough to be worth it for the > headaches you avoid. > > Dan > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobi at oetiker.ch Tue Jan 21 22:01:51 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:01:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Nld, Today Narayan Desai wrote: > Sorry, I should have given the requisite "yes, I know that this is a recipe > for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness". > > That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a > vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't necessarily be any sign, > aside from insanely high service times on an individual device in the pool. > From this, I assume that ZFS is still sensitive to variation in underlying > drive performance. > > Tobi, what do your drive service times look like? > -nld the drives seem fine, smart is not reporting anything out of the ordinary and also iostat -En shows 0 on all counts I don't think it is a disk issue, but rather something connected with the network ... On times the machine becomes unreachable for some time, and then it is possible to login via console and all seems well internally. setting the network interface offline and then online again using the dladm tool brings the connectivity back immediatly. waiting helps as well ... since the problem sorts itself out after a few seconds to minutes ... we just had another 'off the net' periode for 30 minutes unfortunately omnios itself does not seem to realize that something is off, at least dmesg does not show any kernel messages about this problem ... we have several systems running on the S2600CP MB ... this is the only one showing problems ... the next thing I intend todo is to upgrade the MB firmware since I found that this box has an older version than the other ones ... System Configuration: Intel Corporation S2600CP BIOS Configuration: Intel Corp. SE5C600.86B.01.06.0002.110120121539 11/01/2012 other ideas, most welcome ! cheers tobi > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > > > On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Narayan Desai > > wrote: > > > > > We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS > > expander that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in > > iostat -En? or any drive timeout messages in the ring buffer? > > > > Generally speaking --> you use a SATA drive in a SAS expander at your own > > risk. I used to be at Nexenta, and they would not support customers who > > deployed SATA drives on SAS expanders. These days, the price delta between > > SAS and SATA (for enterprise) is small enough to be worth it for the > > headaches you avoid. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 22:09:55 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:09:55 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52DEF033.7010107@gmail.com> On 1/21/14, 10:01 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi Nld, > > Today Narayan Desai wrote: > >> Sorry, I should have given the requisite "yes, I know that this is a recipe >> for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness". >> >> That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a >> vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't necessarily be any sign, >> aside from insanely high service times on an individual device in the pool. >> From this, I assume that ZFS is still sensitive to variation in underlying >> drive performance. >> >> Tobi, what do your drive service times look like? >> -nld > > the drives seem fine, smart is not reporting anything out of the > ordinary and also iostat -En shows 0 on all counts > > I don't think it is a disk issue, but rather something connected > with the network ... > > On times the machine becomes unreachable for some time, and then it > is possible to login via console and all seems well internally. > setting the network interface offline and then online again using > the dladm tool brings the connectivity back immediatly. waiting > helps as well ... since the problem sorts itself out after a few > seconds to minutes ... > > we just had another 'off the net' periode for 30 minutes > > unfortunately omnios itself does not seem to realize that something > is off, at least dmesg does not show any kernel messages about this > problem ... > > we have several systems running on the S2600CP MB ... this is the > only one showing problems ... > > the next thing I intend todo is to upgrade the MB firmware since I > found that this box has an older version than the other ones ... > > System Configuration: Intel Corporation S2600CP > BIOS Configuration: Intel Corp. SE5C600.86B.01.06.0002.110120121539 11/01/2012 > > other ideas, most welcome ! You mentioned a couple of e-mails back that you're using Intel I350s. Can you verify that your kernel has: commit 43ae55058ad99c869a9ae39d039490e8a3680520 Author: Dan McDonald Date: Thu Feb 7 19:27:18 2013 -0500 3534 Disable EEE support in igb for I350 Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi Reviewed by: Jason King Reviewed by: Marcel Telka Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy Approved by: Richard Lowe I guess you can check for this string at runtime: $ strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support If it is missing, then it could be the buggy EEE support that's throwing your link out of whack here. Cheers, -- Saso From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 22:16:11 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:16:11 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: <52DEF033.7010107@gmail.com> References: <52DEF033.7010107@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52DEF1AB.9030305@gmail.com> On 1/21/14, 10:09 PM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 1/21/14, 10:01 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: >> Hi Nld, >> >> Today Narayan Desai wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I should have given the requisite "yes, I know that this is a recipe >>> for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness". >>> >>> That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a >>> vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't necessarily be any sign, >>> aside from insanely high service times on an individual device in the pool. >>> From this, I assume that ZFS is still sensitive to variation in underlying >>> drive performance. >>> >>> Tobi, what do your drive service times look like? >>> -nld >> >> the drives seem fine, smart is not reporting anything out of the >> ordinary and also iostat -En shows 0 on all counts >> >> I don't think it is a disk issue, but rather something connected >> with the network ... >> >> On times the machine becomes unreachable for some time, and then it >> is possible to login via console and all seems well internally. >> setting the network interface offline and then online again using >> the dladm tool brings the connectivity back immediatly. waiting >> helps as well ... since the problem sorts itself out after a few >> seconds to minutes ... >> >> we just had another 'off the net' periode for 30 minutes >> >> unfortunately omnios itself does not seem to realize that something >> is off, at least dmesg does not show any kernel messages about this >> problem ... >> >> we have several systems running on the S2600CP MB ... this is the >> only one showing problems ... >> >> the next thing I intend todo is to upgrade the MB firmware since I >> found that this box has an older version than the other ones ... >> >> System Configuration: Intel Corporation S2600CP >> BIOS Configuration: Intel Corp. SE5C600.86B.01.06.0002.110120121539 11/01/2012 >> >> other ideas, most welcome ! > > You mentioned a couple of e-mails back that you're using Intel I350s. > Can you verify that your kernel has: > > commit 43ae55058ad99c869a9ae39d039490e8a3680520 > Author: Dan McDonald > Date: Thu Feb 7 19:27:18 2013 -0500 > > 3534 Disable EEE support in igb for I350 > Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi > Reviewed by: Jason King > Reviewed by: Marcel Telka > Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy > Approved by: Richard Lowe > > I guess you can check for this string at runtime: > $ strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support > > If it is missing, then it could be the buggy EEE support that's throwing > your link out of whack here. Nevermind, missed your description of the KVM guests being reachable while only the host goes offline... Did snoop show anything arriving at the host while it is offline? Cheers, -- Saso From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Tue Jan 21 22:18:51 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:18:51 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: <52DEF1AB.9030305@gmail.com> References: <52DEF033.7010107@gmail.com> <52DEF1AB.9030305@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52DEF24B.7070806@gmail.com> On 1/21/14, 10:16 PM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 1/21/14, 10:09 PM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: >> On 1/21/14, 10:01 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: >>> Hi Nld, >>> >>> Today Narayan Desai wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry, I should have given the requisite "yes, I know that this is a recipe >>>> for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness". >>>> >>>> That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a >>>> vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't necessarily be any sign, >>>> aside from insanely high service times on an individual device in the pool. >>>> From this, I assume that ZFS is still sensitive to variation in underlying >>>> drive performance. >>>> >>>> Tobi, what do your drive service times look like? >>>> -nld >>> >>> the drives seem fine, smart is not reporting anything out of the >>> ordinary and also iostat -En shows 0 on all counts >>> >>> I don't think it is a disk issue, but rather something connected >>> with the network ... >>> >>> On times the machine becomes unreachable for some time, and then it >>> is possible to login via console and all seems well internally. >>> setting the network interface offline and then online again using >>> the dladm tool brings the connectivity back immediatly. waiting >>> helps as well ... since the problem sorts itself out after a few >>> seconds to minutes ... >>> >>> we just had another 'off the net' periode for 30 minutes >>> >>> unfortunately omnios itself does not seem to realize that something >>> is off, at least dmesg does not show any kernel messages about this >>> problem ... >>> >>> we have several systems running on the S2600CP MB ... this is the >>> only one showing problems ... >>> >>> the next thing I intend todo is to upgrade the MB firmware since I >>> found that this box has an older version than the other ones ... >>> >>> System Configuration: Intel Corporation S2600CP >>> BIOS Configuration: Intel Corp. SE5C600.86B.01.06.0002.110120121539 11/01/2012 >>> >>> other ideas, most welcome ! >> >> You mentioned a couple of e-mails back that you're using Intel I350s. >> Can you verify that your kernel has: >> >> commit 43ae55058ad99c869a9ae39d039490e8a3680520 >> Author: Dan McDonald >> Date: Thu Feb 7 19:27:18 2013 -0500 >> >> 3534 Disable EEE support in igb for I350 >> Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi >> Reviewed by: Jason King >> Reviewed by: Marcel Telka >> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy >> Approved by: Richard Lowe >> >> I guess you can check for this string at runtime: >> $ strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support >> >> If it is missing, then it could be the buggy EEE support that's throwing >> your link out of whack here. > > Nevermind, missed your description of the KVM guests being reachable > while only the host goes offline... Did snoop show anything arriving at > the host while it is offline? However, on second thought, you did mention that you're running crossover between two hosts, which would match the description of the EEE issue: https://illumos.org/issues/3534 "The energy efficient Ethernet (EEE) support in Intel's I350 GigE NIC drops link on directly-attached link cases." Anyhow, make sure you're running the EEE fix. -- Saso From tobi at oetiker.ch Tue Jan 21 23:00:05 2014 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] iscsi timeouts In-Reply-To: <52DEF24B.7070806@gmail.com> References: <52DEF033.7010107@gmail.com> <52DEF1AB.9030305@gmail.com> <52DEF24B.7070806@gmail.com> Message-ID: Today Saso Kiselkov wrote: > >> I guess you can check for this string at runtime: > >> $ strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support > >> > >> If it is missing, then it could be the buggy EEE support that's throwing > >> your link out of whack here. > > > > Nevermind, missed your description of the KVM guests being reachable > > while only the host goes offline... Did snoop show anything arriving at > > the host while it is offline? > > However, on second thought, you did mention that you're running > crossover between two hosts, which would match the description of the > EEE issue: > > https://illumos.org/issues/3534 > "The energy efficient Ethernet (EEE) support in Intel's I350 GigE NIC > drops link on directly-attached link cases." > > Anyhow, make sure you're running the EEE fix. > I think that is in # strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support _eee_support the issue manifests also on the main interface ... the worst case scenario is, that some odd ethernet packet, present only in the wild-west-network where this box lives is sending the network stack into some sort of a tail-spin ... cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From dseira at stackscale.com Wed Jan 22 15:18:48 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:18:48 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Fwd: Dell poweredge In-Reply-To: References: <09819B90-104B-4616-8672-DAFE7A119BF1@omniti.com> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Seira Date: 2014/1/20 Subject: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Dell poweredge To: Dan McDonald Hi Dan, Thank you very much. With this hack it works ;D. If you are agree, I would like to forward this message to the omnios list. Best regards, David 2014/1/20 Dan McDonald > > David!!! > > I just found out something. We did encounter this same problem in NexentaStor, like I said before, but we never upstreamed the change. > > As a workaround, edit the grub line with unix in it and add: " -B disable-amr=true ", which will disable the conflicting-ID, but obsolete, amr(7D) driver. > > I'm sorry I didn't think of this sooner!!! > Dan > -- -- From dseira at stackscale.com Wed Jan 22 16:09:08 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:09:08 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Changing the mtu of a vlan interface Message-ID: Hi all, I'm trying to figure out how change the mtu of a vlan interface once it is created. First I've created the aggr interface with the mtu 1500. Then I've created a vlan for this interface with the same mtu. Next I want to change the mtu of this connection. First I've changed the mtu of the aggr: #dladm set-linkprop -p mtu=9000 aggr0 But the problem comes when I've tried to change the mtu of the vlan interface with the same command; I receive the next message: dladm: warning: cannot set link property 'mtu' on 'aggr0.164': operation not supported I've also tried disable the interface but with the same result. If I delete and create the vlan interface again (with the aggr0 with the mtu 9000) it works. I don't understand why is not possible to change the mtu of a vlan interface once it is created. Is possible? How can I do that? Regards, David From zmalone at omniti.com Wed Jan 22 16:22:36 2014 From: zmalone at omniti.com (Zach Malone) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:22:36 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Changing the mtu of a vlan interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I bet the old ifconfig mtu commands will work, even if dladm won't modify the interface. On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:09 AM, David Seira wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out how change the mtu of a vlan interface once > it is created. > > First I've created the aggr interface with the mtu 1500. Then I've > created a vlan for this interface with the same mtu. > > Next I want to change the mtu of this connection. First I've changed > the mtu of the aggr: > > #dladm set-linkprop -p mtu=9000 aggr0 > > But the problem comes when I've tried to change the mtu of the vlan > interface with the same command; I receive the next message: > > dladm: warning: cannot set link property 'mtu' on 'aggr0.164': > operation not supported > > I've also tried disable the interface but with the same result. > > If I delete and create the vlan interface again (with the aggr0 with > the mtu 9000) it works. > > I don't understand why is not possible to change the mtu of a vlan > interface once it is created. > > Is possible? How can I do that? > > > Regards, > David > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From chip at innovates.com Wed Jan 22 20:47:38 2014 From: chip at innovates.com (Schweiss, Chip) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:47:38 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Heads up: Redhat/CentOS NFSv3 clients file locking failures Message-ID: A recent change in the NLM for NFSv3 has exposed a problem with the firewall on Redhat/CentOS. Connections back to the client are blocked by the firewall because the connection tracking module is not catching connections as part of the open NFS connections to the server. I have attempted to resolve this by opening NFS specific ports but the server kept connecting to ports that I haven't seen referenced before including privileged ports. As a work around I have implemented accept rules for all TCP from the NFS server. This could be across all Linux distributions. My tests have only been on CentOS. The problem first appears when port 111 is blocked, opening 111 basically opens a can worms to what seems randomly selected ports of any value. I know on Linux NFS servers the connection ports can be limited. Is this possible on Illumos? -Chip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dseira at stackscale.com Thu Jan 23 10:34:05 2014 From: dseira at stackscale.com (David Seira) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:34:05 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Changing the mtu of a vlan interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, but the problem is that with ifconfig the changes are not persistent. 2014/1/22 Zach Malone : > I bet the old ifconfig mtu commands will work, even if dladm won't > modify the interface. > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:09 AM, David Seira wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to figure out how change the mtu of a vlan interface once >> it is created. >> >> First I've created the aggr interface with the mtu 1500. Then I've >> created a vlan for this interface with the same mtu. >> >> Next I want to change the mtu of this connection. First I've changed >> the mtu of the aggr: >> >> #dladm set-linkprop -p mtu=9000 aggr0 >> >> But the problem comes when I've tried to change the mtu of the vlan >> interface with the same command; I receive the next message: >> >> dladm: warning: cannot set link property 'mtu' on 'aggr0.164': >> operation not supported >> >> I've also tried disable the interface but with the same result. >> >> If I delete and create the vlan interface again (with the aggr0 with >> the mtu 9000) it works. >> >> I don't understand why is not possible to change the mtu of a vlan >> interface once it is created. >> >> Is possible? How can I do that? >> >> >> Regards, >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From jperkin at joyent.com Fri Jan 24 15:38:01 2014 From: jperkin at joyent.com (Jonathan Perkin) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:38:01 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] pkgsrc-2013Q4 binary packages for illumos now available Message-ID: <20140124153801.GY461@joyent.com> I'm pleased to announce that the pkgsrc-2013Q4 release for illumos platforms is now available. This is an alternative repository of over 11,000 binary packages built in both 32-bit and 64-bit configurations for all illumos systems. A quick-start tutorial is available here: http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/installing.html You will notice from that page that we also provide over 10,000 binary packages for OS X, which may be of interest to those of you who use a Mac to connect to your illumos servers and want to use the same package manager on both systems. The list of major changes in 2013Q4 are here: http://pkgsrc-us-east.joyent.com/changes.html#major-changes-in-pkgsrc2013q4 Please report any bugs or feature requests to our GitHub issues page: https://github.com/joyent/pkgsrc/issues Thanks! -- Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com From ngoossens at gmail.com Sun Jan 26 22:37:47 2014 From: ngoossens at gmail.com (Niels Goossens) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:37:47 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS random freezes Message-ID: In order to rule out OmniOS as the cause of the random hangs, I created a clean Debian install on a new SATA drive, removed the OmniOs boot drive and booted from Debian. After import on the zpool (native ZFS on Linux installed) I ran some tests, basically moving a few large KVM raw images around. This resulted in a hang as well, which I could later reproduce. Again, there is no sign of anything related to this hang in the Debian log files. For some strange reason, using dd to dump the contents of a zvol disk0 to a local file on the same zpool does not hang the machine, but copying that file to an NFS share does. This might be coincidence though, because on OmniOS I could get the system to hang with only a scrub (no network involved). This is starting to look like a hardware issue. I will now exchange the memory in this machine and see if that resolves the issue. After that, I guess I will have to setup BTRFS or something similar to start ruling out the drives... Niels -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fields at gwu.edu Mon Jan 27 21:29:43 2014 From: fields at gwu.edu (Garrett Fields) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:29:43 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] ACL inheritance and ABE broke when using nested filesystems Message-ID: I'm setting up an OmniOS storage server with SMB shares for AD authenticated group shares. I got Active Directory integration, and Access Based Enumeration to working, then focused on quotas. I understand, I can have user/fs, group/fs, and a generic fs quotas. Originally, I was going to use a single fs with directories for the different groups, but then I found that the group/fs quota is based on the primary group in AD, which is "Domain User" for all my users, and I don't have the rights to modify this. Besides, there may be situations where a single user may have multiple group memberships with differing quotas. So, I then created nested fs's under the "group" fs and set generic quotas on those. In the end, this more accuratley accomplishes what I wanted to do but..... Two bad things happened. ACL inheritance broke and ABE broke. ACL of the nested fs reverted to the default ACL (@owner, @group, @everyone) instead of inheriting from "group". I was able to work around this by manually setting my admin account permissions on the server (could have also used root), then via windows adding the additional users/groups. But when I did this, it "rediscovered the inherited permissions from "group", so had two entries. I just deleted the non-inherited entries. It seems like I'd have to do this for every group nested fs. Is there an easier way to do this? I also noticed that the nested fs, which shouldn't be visible because of ABE, are now visible. The security settings is properly blocking access, but I don't want them seen if the user doesn't have access. I have not been able to fix this. Any ideas here? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mofta7y at gmail.com Tue Jan 28 19:39:08 2014 From: mofta7y at gmail.com (moftah moftah) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:39:08 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] no access issue through ssh or through physical console Message-ID: Hi all, We have an issue in our omniOS installation. We use the server as storage server (ZFS) with NFS. the server works great and never crashed actually. but we have very strange issue that after few days we are unable to ssh , http or even directly console access the server. the console of the server when connecting a screen or using the IPMI will show the normal black window where we can type anything but its like typing in vi window nothing will happen. while in this situation the NFS server is running ok with no dropped performance. the only way to go out of this situation is to hard reboot the server is there any way to find out why this happens (I have 2 identical supermicro servers and the issue is reproducible in both servers actually) Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cks at cs.toronto.edu Tue Jan 28 20:34:41 2014 From: cks at cs.toronto.edu (Chris Siebenmann) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:34:41 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Bug in 'zfs userspace -t ....' Message-ID: <20140128203441.EA51A1A0252@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> zfs userspace -t is documented as taking 'posixuser' as a type, and this is traditional Solaris 10 behavior. In OmniOS r151008j, this gets: # zfs userspace -t posixuser -H -o used,name -s name -p rpool/ROOT invalid type 'posixuser' for -t option Inspection of /usr/sbin/zfs with 'strings' shows that somehow it has become 'posxiuser' (and testing shows that this works). This change doesn't appear to be in the current Illumos upstream and I can't see any changeset related to this in a casual browse. - cks From mark at omniti.com Tue Jan 28 20:43:56 2014 From: mark at omniti.com (Mark Harrison) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:43:56 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Bug in 'zfs userspace -t ....' In-Reply-To: <20140128203441.EA51A1A0252@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> References: <20140128203441.EA51A1A0252@apps0.cs.toronto.edu> Message-ID: https://www.illumos.org/issues/4208 Looks like it made it into 151008, and the fix hasn't yet. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Chris Siebenmann wrote: > zfs userspace -t is documented as taking 'posixuser' as a type, > and this is traditional Solaris 10 behavior. In OmniOS r151008j, this > gets: > # zfs userspace -t posixuser -H -o used,name -s name -p rpool/ROOT > invalid type 'posixuser' for -t option > > Inspection of /usr/sbin/zfs with 'strings' shows that somehow it has > become 'posxiuser' (and testing shows that this works). This change > doesn't appear to be in the current Illumos upstream and I can't see > any changeset related to this in a casual browse. > > - cks > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- Mark Harrison Lead Site Reliability Engineer OmniTI From dave-oo at pooserville.com Tue Jan 28 21:12:37 2014 From: dave-oo at pooserville.com (Dave Pooser) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:12:37 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] no access issue through ssh or through physical console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: (resending because I left the list off last time) >We have an issue in our omniOS installation. > >We use the server as storage server (ZFS) with NFS. > >the server works great and never crashed actually. > >but we have very strange issue that after few days we are unable to ssh , >http or even directly console access the server. > >the console of the server when connecting a screen or using the IPMI will >show the normal black window where we can type anything but its like >typing in vi window nothing will happen. > >while in this situation the NFS server is running ok with no dropped >performance. > >the only way to go out of this situation is to hard reboot the server > >is there any way to find out why this happens (I have 2 identical >supermicro servers and the issue is reproducible in both servers actually) If you make an ssh connection to the server when it's working fine, and then leave that connection open until the server issue reappears, does that existing SSH connection still work, or does it go deaf? -- Dave Pooser Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com "...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide across the finish line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, and shouting GERONIMO!!!" -- Bill McKenna From dave-oo at pooserville.com Tue Jan 28 21:17:14 2014 From: dave-oo at pooserville.com (Dave Pooser) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:14 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] no access issue through ssh or through physical console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >never tried it. >but the problem that this server is behind a vpn and maintaining an ssh >connection to it without dropping for days in not easy Is there another server behind the VPN, running Linux or Windows or something, that you could use to ssh in to the OmniOS box? Then when the OmniOS box goes deaf, use IPMI/VNC to get to the existing session.... -- Dave Pooser Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com From mofta7y at gmail.com Tue Jan 28 22:01:07 2014 From: mofta7y at gmail.com (moftah moftah) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:01:07 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] no access issue through ssh or through physical console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: just checked the other spare server that i was hopping it will have the same issue. I didnt have it while it is running for 3 weeks. So that is bad for this case as i wanted to check and ply with the test server and make the changes with the real production server. is there anywhere to read the logs to understand what is the issue ? I mean what are the debugging steps here in this case Thanks On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: > >never tried it. > >but the problem that this server is behind a vpn and maintaining an ssh > >connection to it without dropping for days in not easy > > Is there another server behind the VPN, running Linux or Windows or > something, that you could use to ssh in to the OmniOS box? Then when the > OmniOS box goes deaf, use IPMI/VNC to get to the existing session.... > -- > Dave Pooser > Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lists at marzocchi.net Tue Jan 28 22:48:33 2014 From: lists at marzocchi.net (Olaf Marzocchi) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:48:33 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Bug report: java in r151008 missing libjli.so Message-ID: <61DB66AC-15F2-4D71-B927-0903B1061D84@marzocchi.net> Hello, ?java? doesn?t work in r151008 (libjli.so not found) unless the dev package is installed. Check: $ java ld.so.1: java: fatal: libjli.so: open failed: No such file or directory Killed $ ldd /usr/bin/java libthread.so.1 => /lib/libthread.so.1 libjli.so => (file not found) libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 $ env TERM=xterm-256color SHELL=/bin/bash CLICOLOR=1 LSCOLORS=gxfxcxdxbxegedabagacad PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/opt/omni/bin/ SHLVL=1 _=/usr/bin/env $ pkg search libjli.so INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE basename file usr/java/lib/i386/jli/libjli.so pkg:/developer/java/jdk at 0.5.11-0.151008 basename file usr/java/jre/lib/i386/jli/libjli.so pkg:/runtime/java at 0.5.11-0.151008 $ pkg info java Name: runtime/java Summary: Open-source implementation of the seventh edition of the Java SE Platform State: Installed Publisher: omnios Version: 0.5.11 (jdk7u21-b30) Build Release: 5.11 Branch: 0.151008 Packaging Date: Wed Dec 4 20:10:13 2013 Size: 105.29 MB FMRI: pkg://omnios/runtime/java at 0.5.11,5.11-0.151008:20131204T201013Z $ ldd -s `which java` ? find object=libjli.so; required by /usr/java/bin/java search path=$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli:/usr/openwin/lib (RUNPATH/RPATH from file /usr/java/bin/java) trying path=/usr/java/bin/../lib/i386/jli/libjli.so trying path=/usr/openwin/lib/libjli.so search path=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib (configuration default - /var/ld/ld.config) trying path=/lib/libjli.so trying path=/usr/lib/libjli.so trying path=/usr/local/lib/libjli.so libjli.so => (file not found) ? It is not found because the file is not in /usr/java/bin/../lib/i386/jli/libjli.so but in /usr/java/bin/../jre/lib/i386/jli/libjli.so (the difference is ?/jre?). After installing the dev package, everything is fine. The standard package has been linked on the dev libraries. Checked on a clean install. I don?t know whether this also bring lower performances (I expect a dev lib to be slower, but I?m no expert). Regards Olaf From christian.flaig at gmail.com Wed Jan 29 11:35:26 2014 From: christian.flaig at gmail.com (Christian Flaig) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:35:26 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone Message-ID: Hello, I'm still on r15006, will migrate/re-install soon. I've created a new zone, and can't set the locale from "C" to "en_GB.UTF-8" for that zone. The global zone has this setting, but I haven't found out how to configure it (in non-global zone) or where it is configured (global zone). I've tried the following: (1) /etc/default/init According to several instructions on the web, this is the place where I should put my locale configuration. I can define all the variables, but the system doesn't take them (command "locale" still shows "C"). A comment in the OpenIndiana Wiki mentions somethings about facets in SVC though (see 2). (2) Facets I read about the new way of setting locale in Solaris 11, and thought it might work the same way in OmniOS now. So I did "pkg facet", couldn't find my locale setting (GB) and enabled it with "pkg change-facet 'facet.locale.en_GB=True' ". But then the Solaris docs mention a svc service to be adjusted, and that one is not available on OmniOS it seems (at least not in a default installation): svccfg -s svc:/system/environment:init setprop environment/LANG = astring: en_GB.UTF-8 I'm still puzzled that I can't find where to configure this. I did a search on my locale on /etc in my global zone (where it's correctly configured), but couldn't find anything. Thanks alot for your help. Chris From lotheac at iki.fi Wed Jan 29 13:37:58 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:37:58 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> On Wed, Jan 29 2014 12:35:26 +0100, Christian Flaig wrote: > I'm still on r15006, will migrate/re-install soon. > I've created a new zone, and can't set the locale from "C" to > "en_GB.UTF-8" for that zone. The global zone has this setting, but I > haven't found out how to configure it (in non-global zone) or where it > is configured (global zone). > > I've tried the following: > (1) /etc/default/init > According to several instructions on the web, this is the place where > I should put my locale configuration. I can define all the variables, > but the system doesn't take them (command "locale" still shows "C"). This works for me. You probably need to restart the zone for changes to take effect though. Tested as follows: # pargs -e $(pgrep -z kekkonen svc.startd) 5193: /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd envp[0]: _=*5088*/lib/svc/bin/svc.startd envp[1]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 envp[2]: LC_TIME=C envp[3]: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin envp[4]: PWD=/ envp[5]: SHLVL=1 envp[6]: TZ=Europe/Helsinki envp[7]: A__z="*SHLVL -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From lotheac at iki.fi Wed Jan 29 13:40:58 2014 From: lotheac at iki.fi (Lauri Tirkkonen) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:40:58 +0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] system/fm/smtp-notify mailing about already-resolved events on boot Message-ID: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> smtp-notify seems to be generating emails for every recorded diagnosed event upon system boot, even when those faults have been repaired or resolved long since. We're on r151006. This seems like a bug - is anyone else seeing this? -- Lauri Tirkkonen | +358 50 5341376 | lotheac @ IRCnet From esproul at omniti.com Wed Jan 29 15:06:22 2014 From: esproul at omniti.com (Eric Sproul) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:06:22 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone In-Reply-To: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29 2014 12:35:26 +0100, Christian Flaig wrote: >> I'm still on r15006, will migrate/re-install soon. >> I've created a new zone, and can't set the locale from "C" to >> "en_GB.UTF-8" for that zone. The global zone has this setting, but I >> haven't found out how to configure it (in non-global zone) or where it >> is configured (global zone). >> >> I've tried the following: >> (1) /etc/default/init >> According to several instructions on the web, this is the place where >> I should put my locale configuration. I can define all the variables, >> but the system doesn't take them (command "locale" still shows "C"). > > This works for me. You probably need to restart the zone for changes to > take effect though. Tested as follows: > > # pargs -e $(pgrep -z kekkonen svc.startd) > 5193: /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd > envp[0]: _=*5088*/lib/svc/bin/svc.startd > envp[1]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > envp[2]: LC_TIME=C > envp[3]: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > envp[4]: PWD=/ > envp[5]: SHLVL=1 > envp[6]: TZ=Europe/Helsinki > envp[7]: A__z="*SHLVL You should also try to test over a connection that is not ssh, such as zlogin from the global zone. OpenSSH clients are frequently configured by default to send the client's environment variables to the server (this is a feature of the SSH protocol version 2). See the "SendEnv" setting in your ssh_config man page. This tripped up another of our users recently. Unfortunately, our ssh daemon ("SunSSH"), having been forked quite a long time ago from OpenSSH, does not have the corresponding AcceptEnv server-side control, which could be used prevent clients from sending certain environment variables if you so choose, so for now you'd need to make sure your ssh client doesn't override the server's locale environment. Eric From esproul at omniti.com Wed Jan 29 17:26:04 2014 From: esproul at omniti.com (Eric Sproul) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:26:04 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone In-Reply-To: References: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Rodney A. Mendez wrote: > Is there some good history there about why illumos has yet to reconcile > with upstream OpenSSH? The short answer: no one qualified has stepped up to maintain SunSSH, which is divergent enough from OpenSSH that maintenance is non-trivial. It's all open source, though, so anyone could. There be dragons, though, and as it's such a key component of any server system now, and it involves crypto, we need a great deal of trust in whatever updates come out of it. You can search for previous discussions on the illumos mailing lists, but this document describes the reason for the fork: http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/illumos-gate/usr/src/cmd/ssh/README.altprivsep Eric From Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU Wed Jan 29 18:00:43 2014 From: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU (Kevin Swab) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:00:43 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] system/fm/smtp-notify mailing about already-resolved events on boot In-Reply-To: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> References: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> We have this issue too. For us, it happens on all versions of OmniOS up through r151008 (and all versions of OpenIndiana we've tried too). It will stop if you clear all the fault management logs using a procedure like this: https://blogs.oracle.com/unixgeek/entry/how_to_clear_fmadm_log But this seems a bit drastic. A fix would be most welcome! Kevin On 01/29/2014 06:40 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > smtp-notify seems to be generating emails for every recorded diagnosed > event upon system boot, even when those faults have been repaired or > resolved long since. We're on r151006. > > This seems like a bug - is anyone else seeing this? > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Swab UNIX Systems Administrator ACNS Colorado State University Phone: (970)491-6572 Email: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU GPG Fingerprint: 7026 3F66 A970 67BD 6F17 8EB8 8A7D 142F 2392 791C From zembower at criterion.com Wed Jan 29 18:38:24 2014 From: zembower at criterion.com (Chris Zembower) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:38:24 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband Message-ID: Hello, I'm trying to dig up some information on Illumos (or Solaris) compatibility with the Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI HCA. From what I can gather, the Hermon driver (for 1st-gen ConnectX) may work with this hardware with tweaking, but I can't seem to confirm that. OmniOS is my server OS of choice (I have several systems running), but the necessity of a working IB fabric here has led me to implement a ZFS on Linux box for this particular purpose. I'm currently using LIO/targetcli to export block SRP targets, and I'm not happy with it at all. Really wishing I had Comstar for this. Anyone here using IB with OmniOS? Anyone aware of a roadmap or active development of new IB drivers? Why isn't there an Illumos OFED port happening? No interest? It's thriving on the Linux side of the world... Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've heard it all. :-) Any insights or suggestions are very much appreciated! Best, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dswartz at druber.com Wed Jan 29 18:45:46 2014 From: dswartz at druber.com (Dan Swartzendruber) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:45:46 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2b3ee868d32b00c124bf3f341a7f7f3b.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> Chris, I totally understand where you are coming from. Linux has all the latest and greatest goodies, but still is not stable for ZFS for my use cases. Illumos (and OI and etc) all work out of the box and stably, but drivers for things like this, well... From skiselkov.ml at gmail.com Wed Jan 29 18:50:27 2014 From: skiselkov.ml at gmail.com (Saso Kiselkov) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:50:27 +0000 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52E94D73.7060806@gmail.com> On 1/29/14, 6:38 PM, Chris Zembower wrote: > Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've > heard it all. :-) You're not alone in your appreciation of IB's brute strength. As for why stuff isn't happening, my guess is lack of manpower - we're a really small community and people work on what they like, plus what they can get their hands on (and IB gear is a little exotic). That being said, I'd love to have a mature and up-to-date IB stack on Illumos that could be used in production. It's sorely needed. Cheers, -- Saso From christian.flaig at gmail.com Wed Jan 29 18:53:12 2014 From: christian.flaig at gmail.com (Christian Flaig) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:53:12 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone In-Reply-To: References: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> Message-ID: <3F7B98BA-8C7B-4CA8-8BF5-E2ABB415AED3@gmail.com> Thanks for all your help! I will now separate global zone and non-global zone, easier for me to report back. Global zone Eric, thanks, you were right about the global zone, ssh and taking settings from ssh client machine. Once I used IPMI to log into the machine, I had LANG and all LC_* on "C" again. So that explains why I couldn't find any configuration for my locale setting. I changed/added LANG and LC_ALL in /etc/default/init. Can't reboot right now, so need to wait for any impact. Non-global zone So I configured /etc/default/init again, like global zone above. Reboot. Logged into zone with zlogin, and got all locales on "C" again (ran command "locale"). Ran Lauri's command and it showed the wanted locale on LANG and LC_ALL. So I'm confused. "locale" always shows "C" or the setting of my SSH client machine, no change whatever I do. Lauri's command shows the right setting. And my application running in the zone seems to be happy with the new locale too. Is there a bug or something in locale? I understand that I can set LANG and LC_* also as env variables, where would I do that for a system, not only for one user? Thanks for your help. Regards, Chris On 29 Jan 2014, at 16:06, Eric Sproul wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29 2014 12:35:26 +0100, Christian Flaig wrote: >>> I'm still on r15006, will migrate/re-install soon. >>> I've created a new zone, and can't set the locale from "C" to >>> "en_GB.UTF-8" for that zone. The global zone has this setting, but I >>> haven't found out how to configure it (in non-global zone) or where it >>> is configured (global zone). >>> >>> I've tried the following: >>> (1) /etc/default/init >>> According to several instructions on the web, this is the place where >>> I should put my locale configuration. I can define all the variables, >>> but the system doesn't take them (command "locale" still shows "C"). >> >> This works for me. You probably need to restart the zone for changes to >> take effect though. Tested as follows: >> >> # pargs -e $(pgrep -z kekkonen svc.startd) >> 5193: /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd >> envp[0]: _=*5088*/lib/svc/bin/svc.startd >> envp[1]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >> envp[2]: LC_TIME=C >> envp[3]: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin >> envp[4]: PWD=/ >> envp[5]: SHLVL=1 >> envp[6]: TZ=Europe/Helsinki >> envp[7]: A__z="*SHLVL > > You should also try to test over a connection that is not ssh, such as > zlogin from the global zone. OpenSSH clients are frequently > configured by default to send the client's environment variables to > the server (this is a feature of the SSH protocol version 2). See the > "SendEnv" setting in your ssh_config man page. This tripped up > another of our users recently. > > Unfortunately, our ssh daemon ("SunSSH"), having been forked quite a > long time ago from OpenSSH, does not have the corresponding AcceptEnv > server-side control, which could be used prevent clients from sending > certain environment variables if you so choose, so for now you'd need > to make sure your ssh client doesn't override the server's locale > environment. > > Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu Wed Jan 29 19:06:36 2014 From: ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu (Ian Kaufman) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:06:36 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: <52E94D73.7060806@gmail.com> References: <52E94D73.7060806@gmail.com> Message-ID: I use OminOS and IB, and ran into the ConnectX-3 driver issues as we were moving towards interfaces that can use QDR, FDR, 10GbE, or 40GbE, depending on drivers and fabric. We had to go back to ConnectX-2 QDR to get it all working. I was able to hack things to at least get the NIC identified, but obviously the drivers were not there. I was contemplating building OFED from source, but I don't have the time. Ian On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 1/29/14, 6:38 PM, Chris Zembower wrote: >> Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've >> heard it all. :-) > > You're not alone in your appreciation of IB's brute strength. As for why > stuff isn't happening, my guess is lack of manpower - we're a really > small community and people work on what they like, plus what they can > get their hands on (and IB gear is a little exotic). That being said, > I'd love to have a mature and up-to-date IB stack on Illumos that could > be used in production. It's sorely needed. > > Cheers, > -- > Saso > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- Ian Kaufman Research Systems Administrator UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu From mark at omniti.com Wed Jan 29 19:11:58 2014 From: mark at omniti.com (Mark Harrison) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:11:58 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Set locale in zone In-Reply-To: <3F7B98BA-8C7B-4CA8-8BF5-E2ABB415AED3@gmail.com> References: <20140129133758.GA8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <3F7B98BA-8C7B-4CA8-8BF5-E2ABB415AED3@gmail.com> Message-ID: It appears that zlogin also messes with the environment, only in this case it generates an environment with only a select few variables set (LOGNAME, HOME, SHELL, MAIL), which leaves LANG unset (and locale uses the environment to determine the values it prints out), so it looks like zlogin -C is the only way to verify the locale on a zone. As for system wide variables, somewhere like /etc/profile would probably do the trick. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Christian Flaig wrote: > Thanks for all your help! > > I will now separate global zone and non-global zone, easier for me to report > back. > > Global zone > Eric, thanks, you were right about the global zone, ssh and taking settings > from ssh client machine. Once I used IPMI to log into the machine, I had > LANG and all LC_* on "C" again. So that explains why I couldn't find any > configuration for my locale setting. I changed/added LANG and LC_ALL in > /etc/default/init. Can't reboot right now, so need to wait for any impact. > > Non-global zone > So I configured /etc/default/init again, like global zone above. Reboot. > Logged into zone with zlogin, and got all locales on "C" again (ran command > "locale"). Ran Lauri's command and it showed the wanted locale on LANG and > LC_ALL. > > So I'm confused. "locale" always shows "C" or the setting of my SSH client > machine, no change whatever I do. Lauri's command shows the right setting. > And my application running in the zone seems to be happy with the new locale > too. > > Is there a bug or something in locale? I understand that I can set LANG and > LC_* also as env variables, where would I do that for a system, not only for > one user? > > Thanks for your help. > > Regards, > > Chris > > On 29 Jan 2014, at 16:06, Eric Sproul wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29 2014 12:35:26 +0100, Christian Flaig wrote: > > I'm still on r15006, will migrate/re-install soon. > I've created a new zone, and can't set the locale from "C" to > "en_GB.UTF-8" for that zone. The global zone has this setting, but I > haven't found out how to configure it (in non-global zone) or where it > is configured (global zone). > > I've tried the following: > (1) /etc/default/init > According to several instructions on the web, this is the place where > I should put my locale configuration. I can define all the variables, > but the system doesn't take them (command "locale" still shows "C"). > > > This works for me. You probably need to restart the zone for changes to > take effect though. Tested as follows: > > # pargs -e $(pgrep -z kekkonen svc.startd) > 5193: /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd > envp[0]: _=*5088*/lib/svc/bin/svc.startd > envp[1]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > envp[2]: LC_TIME=C > envp[3]: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > envp[4]: PWD=/ > envp[5]: SHLVL=1 > envp[6]: TZ=Europe/Helsinki > envp[7]: A__z="*SHLVL > > > You should also try to test over a connection that is not ssh, such as > zlogin from the global zone. OpenSSH clients are frequently > configured by default to send the client's environment variables to > the server (this is a feature of the SSH protocol version 2). See the > "SendEnv" setting in your ssh_config man page. This tripped up > another of our users recently. > > Unfortunately, our ssh daemon ("SunSSH"), having been forked quite a > long time ago from OpenSSH, does not have the corresponding AcceptEnv > server-side control, which could be used prevent clients from sending > certain environment variables if you so choose, so for now you'd need > to make sure your ssh client doesn't override the server's locale > environment. > > Eric > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- Mark Harrison Lead Site Reliability Engineer OmniTI From turbo124 at gmail.com Wed Jan 29 19:17:11 2014 From: turbo124 at gmail.com (David Bomba) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:17:11 +1100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Chris, We have an environment running OmniOS with both ConnectX and ConnectX-2 cards. The Hermon and Tavor drivers work very well. The only problem we had was that the CX-2 cards would only sync at 20gb/s. We export Comstar iSER targets and they have been rock solid for us for over a year. Dave On 30 January 2014 05:38, Chris Zembower wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to dig up some information on Illumos (or Solaris) > compatibility with the Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI HCA. From what I can gather, > the Hermon driver (for 1st-gen ConnectX) may work with this hardware with > tweaking, but I can't seem to confirm that. > > OmniOS is my server OS of choice (I have several systems running), but the > necessity of a working IB fabric here has led me to implement a ZFS on > Linux box for this particular purpose. I'm currently using LIO/targetcli to > export block SRP targets, and I'm not happy with it at all. Really wishing > I had Comstar for this. > > Anyone here using IB with OmniOS? Anyone aware of a roadmap or active > development of new IB drivers? Why isn't there an Illumos OFED port > happening? No interest? It's thriving on the Linux side of the world... > > Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've > heard it all. :-) > > Any insights or suggestions are very much appreciated! > > Best, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu Wed Jan 29 19:24:49 2014 From: ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu (Ian Kaufman) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:24:49 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On my systems, the X-2 cards claim 32 gbps. I sued IPoIB, and have seen transfers NFS transfers over 6 gbps and snapshot send/receive as high as 1.8 gbps while the system was simultaneously utilized during cluster computation. Ian On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:17 AM, David Bomba wrote: > Hi Chris, > > We have an environment running OmniOS with both ConnectX and ConnectX-2 > cards. The Hermon and Tavor drivers work very well. > > The only problem we had was that the CX-2 cards would only sync at 20gb/s. > We export Comstar iSER targets and they have been rock solid for us for over > a year. > > Dave > > > On 30 January 2014 05:38, Chris Zembower wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to dig up some information on Illumos (or Solaris) >> compatibility with the Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI HCA. From what I can gather, >> the Hermon driver (for 1st-gen ConnectX) may work with this hardware with >> tweaking, but I can't seem to confirm that. >> >> OmniOS is my server OS of choice (I have several systems running), but the >> necessity of a working IB fabric here has led me to implement a ZFS on Linux >> box for this particular purpose. I'm currently using LIO/targetcli to export >> block SRP targets, and I'm not happy with it at all. Really wishing I had >> Comstar for this. >> >> Anyone here using IB with OmniOS? Anyone aware of a roadmap or active >> development of new IB drivers? Why isn't there an Illumos OFED port >> happening? No interest? It's thriving on the Linux side of the world... >> >> Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've >> heard it all. :-) >> >> Any insights or suggestions are very much appreciated! >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- Ian Kaufman Research Systems Administrator UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu From dswartz at druber.com Wed Jan 29 19:42:01 2014 From: dswartz at druber.com (Dan Swartzendruber) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:42:01 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> > On my systems, the X-2 cards claim 32 gbps. I sued IPoIB, and have > seen transfers NFS transfers over 6 gbps and snapshot send/receive as > high as 1.8 gbps while the system was simultaneously utilized during > cluster computation. > > Ian I assume you meant 'used', not 'sued'? If not, your lawyer is in the wrong line of work :) From ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu Wed Jan 29 20:38:13 2014 From: ikaufman at eng.ucsd.edu (Ian Kaufman) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:38:13 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> References: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> Message-ID: Heh - mistype. But that cease and desist we sent to IPoIB ... :) On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: >> On my systems, the X-2 cards claim 32 gbps. I sued IPoIB, and have >> seen transfers NFS transfers over 6 gbps and snapshot send/receive as >> high as 1.8 gbps while the system was simultaneously utilized during >> cluster computation. >> >> Ian > > I assume you meant 'used', not 'sued'? If not, your lawyer is in the > wrong line of work :) > -- Ian Kaufman Research Systems Administrator UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu From zembower at criterion.com Wed Jan 29 20:51:47 2014 From: zembower at criterion.com (Chris Zembower) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:47 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> Message-ID: Well, this is all very encouraging! I guess there is interest and actual usage out there. Unfortunately, I need FDR-ish speeds (at least 4GB/s), the entire network is setup for FDR, and I only have ConnectX-3 adapters, so it's Linux for me until some new developments emerge. Dan, I can somewhat vouch for the stability of ZFS on Debian and CentOS using the ZoL kernel implementation. My Debian system (the one using IB) is at 65 days uptime with a 24/7 heavy load, managing 100TB+ of datasets in a quasi-production (replicated) environment. First disk replacement went smoothly last week. Time will tell... The CentOS install has been up for close to a year. However, in terms of raw disk access speeds, neither of these systems performs anywhere near as well as OmniOS or OI. Thanks, all. I look forward to joining the conversation here in general. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ian Kaufman wrote: > Heh - mistype. But that cease and desist we sent to IPoIB ... > > :) > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dan Swartzendruber > wrote: > >> On my systems, the X-2 cards claim 32 gbps. I sued IPoIB, and have > >> seen transfers NFS transfers over 6 gbps and snapshot send/receive as > >> high as 1.8 gbps while the system was simultaneously utilized during > >> cluster computation. > >> > >> Ian > > > > I assume you meant 'used', not 'sued'? If not, your lawyer is in the > > wrong line of work :) > > > > > > -- > Ian Kaufman > Research Systems Administrator > UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering ikaufman AT ucsd DOT edu > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dswartz at druber.com Wed Jan 29 20:59:25 2014 From: dswartz at druber.com (Dan Swartzendruber) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:59:25 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> Message-ID: <36d0aa97198490f9b2d095b39a18f244.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> > Well, this is all very encouraging! I guess there is interest and actual > usage out there. > > Unfortunately, I need FDR-ish speeds (at least 4GB/s), the entire network > is setup for FDR, and I only have ConnectX-3 adapters, so it's Linux for > me > until some new developments emerge. > > Dan, I can somewhat vouch for the stability of ZFS on Debian and CentOS > using the ZoL kernel implementation. My Debian system (the one using IB) > is > at 65 days uptime with a 24/7 heavy load, managing 100TB+ of datasets in a > quasi-production (replicated) environment. First disk replacement went > smoothly last week. Time will tell... The CentOS install has been up for > close to a year. However, in terms of raw disk access speeds, neither of > these systems performs anywhere near as well as OmniOS or OI. Chris, let me clarify. I had this same converasation on a forum somewhere where some guy got all defensive and borderline-accused me of being an anti-ZoL troll or something. Anyway, for basic I/O and serving up NFS (andmaybe even iSCSI) clients, sure, I agree! The places it still falls down (not directly related to ZoL itself) are things where if your HBA is a little slow off the mark presenting the disks to the ZFS driver, you can end up with zvols that are not visible, datasets that have to be manually exported, iscsi target daemon needing to be manually restarted, etc... All having to do with bad timing between udev and ZFS. Oh, also, no zfs root pool unless you want to slide down a very sharp razor blade... From zembower at criterion.com Wed Jan 29 21:05:34 2014 From: zembower at criterion.com (Chris Zembower) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:05:34 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: <36d0aa97198490f9b2d095b39a18f244.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> References: <81d868b80675c38d752d836181a8cad3.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> <36d0aa97198490f9b2d095b39a18f244.squirrel@webmail.druber.com> Message-ID: Totally agreed on all fronts, and many, many more. That's why I emailed the list! On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > Well, this is all very encouraging! I guess there is interest and actual > > usage out there. > > > > Unfortunately, I need FDR-ish speeds (at least 4GB/s), the entire network > > is setup for FDR, and I only have ConnectX-3 adapters, so it's Linux for > > me > > until some new developments emerge. > > > > Dan, I can somewhat vouch for the stability of ZFS on Debian and CentOS > > using the ZoL kernel implementation. My Debian system (the one using IB) > > is > > at 65 days uptime with a 24/7 heavy load, managing 100TB+ of datasets in > a > > quasi-production (replicated) environment. First disk replacement went > > smoothly last week. Time will tell... The CentOS install has been up for > > close to a year. However, in terms of raw disk access speeds, neither of > > these systems performs anywhere near as well as OmniOS or OI. > > Chris, let me clarify. I had this same converasation on a forum somewhere > where some guy got all defensive and borderline-accused me of being an > anti-ZoL troll or something. Anyway, for basic I/O and serving up NFS > (andmaybe even iSCSI) clients, sure, I agree! The places it still falls > down (not directly related to ZoL itself) are things where if your HBA is > a little slow off the mark presenting the disks to the ZFS driver, you can > end up with zvols that are not visible, datasets that have to be manually > exported, iscsi target daemon needing to be manually restarted, etc... > All having to do with bad timing between udev and ZFS. Oh, also, no zfs > root pool unless you want to slide down a very sharp razor blade... > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nsmith at careyweb.com Wed Jan 29 21:59:35 2014 From: nsmith at careyweb.com (Nate Smith) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:59:35 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Migrating from OpenIndiana Message-ID: <00e3cde8-116d-4da5-857c-f24a0883afbe@careyweb.com> I'm going to migrate the ZFS systems on my OpenIndiana file server to an Omnios based one for greater stability (my Openindiana server seems to lose all network connectivity about once every three months, though all the FC targets stay mounted and accessible). I am running oi_151a7, with version 28 ZFS volumes. They are presented as block storage Comstar targets over fibre channel. Should I have any problems migrating these to Omnios? Thanks in advance. -Nate -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From narayan.desai at gmail.com Wed Jan 29 23:00:40 2014 From: narayan.desai at gmail.com (Narayan Desai) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:00:40 -0600 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Illumos and Infiniband In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We're running a mixed system with connectX 1 and 2, and IB only cards work great with the hermon driver. We haven't had any luck with CX3, but hear that it is possible. Performance has been quite good, and we haven't needed to worry about it so far (knock on wood) I did a bunch of digging to figure out the OFED front. Basically: - Sun did the port themselves - they wrote native drivers that provide a different API than the linux drivers - they took their ball and went home Mellanox has only had indirect involvement in this, and afaict, there has never been any open activity on this. Syoyo Fujita did a forward port of the last public release of the userland source bits (from sunfreeware.com, iirc), and there is a binary package of the userland bits that works fine for omnios (at least for us). I haven't managed to get a full build working myself. This bits are here: - github.com/syoyo/solaris-infiniband-tools Unfortunately, this doesn't do you much good on the CX3 front; the drivers need to be done/reworked for illumos directly. We're interested in this in order to build high bandwidth servers; we're going to need 60-80 gbit in the next year or so, which means RDMA is the only option. -nld On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Chris Zembower wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to dig up some information on Illumos (or Solaris) > compatibility with the Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI HCA. From what I can gather, > the Hermon driver (for 1st-gen ConnectX) may work with this hardware with > tweaking, but I can't seem to confirm that. > > OmniOS is my server OS of choice (I have several systems running), but the > necessity of a working IB fabric here has led me to implement a ZFS on > Linux box for this particular purpose. I'm currently using LIO/targetcli to > export block SRP targets, and I'm not happy with it at all. Really wishing > I had Comstar for this. > > Anyone here using IB with OmniOS? Anyone aware of a roadmap or active > development of new IB drivers? Why isn't there an Illumos OFED port > happening? No interest? It's thriving on the Linux side of the world... > > Please don't lecture me on the merits of 10GbE/FC over Infiniband, I've > heard it all. :-) > > Any insights or suggestions are very much appreciated! > > Best, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br Thu Jan 30 13:18:37 2014 From: fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br (=?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A1bio_Rabelo?=) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:18:37 -0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] create ordinary user Message-ID: Hi to all I am trying netatalk in an OminOS box, and having problem to create a user ... All and every how-to that I found in the web refers to an utilitary in command line from OpenSolaris, but this tool do not exist in OmniOS ... So, how can I create an ordinary user to authenticate against netatalk ? Thanks in advance ... F?bio Rabelo From matej at zunaj.si Thu Jan 30 15:54:18 2014 From: matej at zunaj.si (Matej Zerovnik) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:54:18 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Can't copy/rsync to NFS share Message-ID: <52EA75AA.6040402@zunaj.si> Hello!! I'm trying to setup NFS and SMB shares with ACL support and I got into troubles... I have a share, that is mounted to linux client over NFSv3 and to windows client over SMB. My ACL's looks like the following: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5934229/forumi/ACL_for_share.png What I want is to have a 755 unix permissions on folders and 644 permissions on files. User levak and root have full rights, when they access the folder from windows. That seems to be properly configured. Now the problem. I tried to copy my data from one drive to another. It starts to copy, but after some time, I start getting errors "cant create file, operation not permitted": [CODE]`joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js' -> `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js' cp: cannot create regular file `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js': Operation not permitted `joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js' -> `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js' cp: cannot create regular file `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js': Operation not permitted [/CODE] If I cancel the transfer and start again, it goes a little further and after some 10% more copied files, it starts throwing errors again, and so on and so on... The same happens if I try to copy over data with rsync... I use -var parameters(verbose, archieve, recursive. It shows that it is coping files, but when I look in the folder, all files start with a . and a size of 0. After some time, it start throwing errors: [CODE] rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.index.html.gYKDOw" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.templates.xml.exWYLJ" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.toolbar.templates.html.php.0bG6WW" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.toolbar.templates.php.5wyZ89" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/helpers/.index.html.qSFt8m" failed: Operation not permitted (1) [/CODE] What is causing this? Are my ACL's wrong? Matej -- ------- http://www.zunaj.si - outdoor blog From matej at zunaj.si Thu Jan 30 15:57:58 2014 From: matej at zunaj.si (Matej Zerovnik) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:57:58 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Can't copy/rsync to NFS share Message-ID: <52EA7686.2020701@zunaj.si> Hello!! I'm trying to setup NFS and SMB shares with ACL support and I got into troubles... I have a share, that is mounted to linux client over NFSv3 and to windows client over SMB. My ACL's looks like the following: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5934229/forumi/ACL_for_share.png What I want is to have a 755 unix permissions on folders and 644 permissions on files. User levak and root have full rights, when they access the folder from windows. That seems to be properly configured. Now the problem. I tried to copy my data from one drive to another. It starts to copy, but after some time, I start getting errors "cant create file, operation not permitted": `joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js' -> `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js' cp: cannot create regular file `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin_src.js': Operation not permitted `joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js' -> `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js' cp: cannot create regular file `/omnios/joomla/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/safari/editor_plugin.js': Operation not permitted If I cancel the transfer and start again, it goes a little further and after some 10% more copied files, it starts throwing errors again, and so on and so on... The same happens if I try to copy over data with rsync... I use -var parameters(verbose, archieve, recursive. It shows that it is coping files, but when I look in the folder, all files start with a . and a size of 0. After some time, it start throwing errors: rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.index.html.gYKDOw" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.templates.xml.exWYLJ" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.toolbar.templates.html.php.0bG6WW" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/.toolbar.templates.php.5wyZ89" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: mkstemp "/omnios/joomla/administrator/components/com_templates/helpers/.index.html.qSFt8m" failed: Operation not permitted (1) What is causing this? Are my ACL's wrong? Matej -- ------- http://www.zunaj.si - outdoor blog -- ------- http://www.zunaj.si - outdoor blog From stefan.skoglund at agj.net Thu Jan 30 15:08:10 2014 From: stefan.skoglund at agj.net (Stefan Skoglund) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:08:10 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [zfs] Heads up: Redhat/CentOS NFSv3 clients file locking failures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1391094490.29057.8.camel@compaq.lokeldarn.hobby-site.org> ons 2014-01-22 klockan 14:47 -0600 skrev Schweiss, Chip: > A recent change in the NLM for NFSv3 has exposed a problem with the > firewall on Redhat/CentOS. > > Connections back to the client are blocked by the firewall because the > connection tracking module is not catching connections as part of the > open NFS connections to the server. > This is (i think) callback related. The portmapper works such that its users (for example the client-side nfs kernel modules) bind to a tcp port and then registers the port's number with the portmapper. Which means that the user's port number gets randomized, EXCEPT this: --- [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# lsmod |grep nfs nfsd 173890 2 nfs 265921 2 nfs_acl 12463 2 nfs,nfsd auth_rpcgss 32143 5 nfs,nfsd,rpcsec_gss_krb5 fscache 31978 1 nfs lockd 57277 2 nfs,nfsd sunrpc 143904 16 lockd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,nfs,nfsd,rpcsec_gss_krb5 [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# modinfo nfsd filename: /lib/modules/3.2.0-4-686-pae/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko license: GPL author: Olaf Kirch depends: auth_rpcgss,sunrpc,lockd,nfs_acl intree: Y vermagic: 3.2.0-4-686-pae SMP mod_unload modversions 686 [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# modinfo nfs filename: /lib/modules/3.2.0-4-686-pae/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.ko license: GPL author: Olaf Kirch alias: nfs4 depends: fscache,sunrpc,lockd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl intree: Y vermagic: 3.2.0-4-686-pae SMP mod_unload modversions 686 parm: callback_tcpport:portnr parm: cache_getent:Path to the client cache upcall program (string) parm: cache_getent_timeout:Timeout (in seconds) after which the cache upcall is assumed to have failed (ulong) parm: enable_ino64:bool parm: nfs4_disable_idmapping:Turn off NFSv4 idmapping when using 'sec=sys' (bool) [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# cat /etc/modprobe.d/local-conf-nfs-fixed-ports.conf options nfs callback_tcpport=2050 options lockd nlm_tcpport=2051 nlm_udpport=2051 [sudo root at compaq: /home/stefan]# ---- The nfs related modules has parameters for using locally defined well-known port numbers and which the firewall can be configured to recognize. I do use NFS4. From lists at marzocchi.net Thu Jan 30 20:24:33 2014 From: lists at marzocchi.net (Olaf Marzocchi) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:24:33 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] system/fm/smtp-notify mailing about already-resolved events on boot In-Reply-To: <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> References: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> Message-ID: Il giorno 29/gen/2014, alle ore 19:00, Kevin Swab ha scritto: > We have this issue too. For us, it happens on all versions of OmniOS up > through r151008 (and all versions of OpenIndiana we've tried too). > > It will stop if you clear all the fault management logs using a > procedure like this: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/unixgeek/entry/how_to_clear_fmadm_log > > But this seems a bit drastic. A fix would be most welcome! > > Kevin > > > > On 01/29/2014 06:40 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >> smtp-notify seems to be generating emails for every recorded diagnosed >> event upon system boot, even when those faults have been repaired or >> resolved long since. We're on r151006. >> >> This seems like a bug - is anyone else seeing this? >> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Kevin Swab UNIX Systems Administrator > ACNS Colorado State University > Phone: (970)491-6572 Email: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU > GPG Fingerprint: 7026 3F66 A970 67BD 6F17 8EB8 8A7D 142F 2392 791C > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From lists at marzocchi.net Thu Jan 30 20:25:31 2014 From: lists at marzocchi.net (Olaf Marzocchi) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:25:31 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] system/fm/smtp-notify mailing about already-resolved events on boot In-Reply-To: <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> References: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> Message-ID: I didn?t know smtp-notify but looked useful so I tried to install it. However, it depends on sendmail and I already have postfix, that also provides a binary /usr/sbin/sendmail, so they conflict (see below). If I install the ms.omniti package postfix (compiled for r151006 but probably fine) the conflict should disappear (its sendmail goes to opt/omni/sbin/sendmail) but then how to be sure that the postfix?s one is used? Could give me some directions? Thanks Olaf $ pfexec pkg install service/fault-management/smtp-notify Creating Plan | pkg install: The requested change to the system attempts to install multiple actions for link 'usr/sbin/sendmail' with conflicting attributes: 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/sbin/sendmail target=../lib/sendmail': pkg://omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024609Z 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/sbin/sendmail target=../local/sbin/sendmail': pkg://uulm.mawi/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2,5.11-0.151008:20140111T165835Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages deliver conflicting action types to usr/lib/sendmail: link: pkg://uulm.mawi/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2,5.11-0.151008:20140111T165835Z file: pkg://omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024609Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. $ pkg search sendmail INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE basename file usr/local/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 basename link usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 basename link usr/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 pkg.descr set Wietse Venema's mail server alternative to Sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 basename file opt/omni/sbin/sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 basename file usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 pkg.description set Sendmail Utilities pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 pkg.summary set Sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 basename file etc/init.d/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 basename file usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 basename link usr/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 pkg.fmri set omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 Il giorno 29/gen/2014, alle ore 19:00, Kevin Swab ha scritto: > We have this issue too. For us, it happens on all versions of OmniOS up > through r151008 (and all versions of OpenIndiana we've tried too). > > It will stop if you clear all the fault management logs using a > procedure like this: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/unixgeek/entry/how_to_clear_fmadm_log > > But this seems a bit drastic. A fix would be most welcome! > > Kevin > > > > On 01/29/2014 06:40 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >> smtp-notify seems to be generating emails for every recorded diagnosed >> event upon system boot, even when those faults have been repaired or >> resolved long since. We're on r151006. >> >> This seems like a bug - is anyone else seeing this? >> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Kevin Swab UNIX Systems Administrator > ACNS Colorado State University > Phone: (970)491-6572 Email: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU > GPG Fingerprint: 7026 3F66 A970 67BD 6F17 8EB8 8A7D 142F 2392 791C > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From frederic.alix at fredalix.com Fri Jan 31 00:35:25 2014 From: frederic.alix at fredalix.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Alix?=) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:35:25 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [OmniOS] Two problem for set a zfs dataset in a zone Message-ID: Hello :) I have two problem for use a zfs dataset in a zone. First, i would like use it as a device zfs create -V5g rpool/data0 In zonecfg: add device set match = "/dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/data0" end I boot the zone, and the device don't appear. I read this, but it not resolve the problem http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/2013-February/000479.html After, i try to use it lie this: add dataset set name = rpool/data0 end and when i want boot the zone: root at box:/var/tmp# zoneadm -z nappit0 boot zone 'nappit0': cannot open ZFS dataset 'rpool/data0' zoneadm: zone 'nappit0': call to zoneadmd failed But my dataset exist root at box:/var/tmp# zfs list rpool/data0 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool/data0 5,16G 33,2G 16K - Can you help me please ? Regards, Fr?d?ric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sk at kram.io Fri Jan 31 08:13:45 2014 From: sk at kram.io (Steffen Kram) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:13:45 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] system/fm/smtp-notify mailing about already-resolved events on boot In-Reply-To: References: <20140129134058.GB8324@gutsman.lotheac.fi> <52E941CB.6050409@ColoState.EDU> Message-ID: Hi Olaf, I provide a patched smtp-notify that does not depend on sendmail. However, you still have to throw out the smf dependency on sendmail manually. Cheers, Steffen Am 30.01.2014 um 21:25 schrieb Olaf Marzocchi : > I didn?t know smtp-notify but looked useful so I tried to install it. > However, it depends on sendmail and I already have postfix, that also provides a binary /usr/sbin/sendmail, so they conflict (see below). > If I install the ms.omniti package postfix (compiled for r151006 but probably fine) the conflict should disappear (its sendmail goes to opt/omni/sbin/sendmail) but then how to be sure that the postfix?s one is used? > > Could give me some directions? > > Thanks > Olaf > > > $ pfexec pkg install service/fault-management/smtp-notify > Creating Plan | > pkg install: The requested change to the system attempts to install multiple actions > for link 'usr/sbin/sendmail' with conflicting attributes: > > 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/sbin/sendmail target=../lib/sendmail': > pkg://omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024609Z > 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/sbin/sendmail target=../local/sbin/sendmail': > pkg://uulm.mawi/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2,5.11-0.151008:20140111T165835Z > > These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may > be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. > > The following packages deliver conflicting action types to usr/lib/sendmail: > > link: > pkg://uulm.mawi/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2,5.11-0.151008:20140111T165835Z > file: > pkg://omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4,5.11-0.151008:20131204T024609Z > > These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may > be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. > > $ pkg search sendmail > INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE > basename file usr/local/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 > basename link usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 > basename link usr/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151008 > pkg.descr set Wietse Venema's mail server alternative to Sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 > basename file opt/omni/sbin/sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 > basename file usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/omniti/network/smtp/postfix at 2.10.2-0.151006 > pkg.description set Sendmail Utilities pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > pkg.summary set Sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > basename file etc/init.d/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > basename file usr/lib/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > basename link usr/sbin/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > pkg.fmri set omnios/service/network/smtp/sendmail pkg:/service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.151008 > > > > Il giorno 29/gen/2014, alle ore 19:00, Kevin Swab ha scritto: > >> We have this issue too. For us, it happens on all versions of OmniOS up >> through r151008 (and all versions of OpenIndiana we've tried too). >> >> It will stop if you clear all the fault management logs using a >> procedure like this: >> >> https://blogs.oracle.com/unixgeek/entry/how_to_clear_fmadm_log >> >> But this seems a bit drastic. A fix would be most welcome! >> >> Kevin >> >> >> >> On 01/29/2014 06:40 AM, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: >>> smtp-notify seems to be generating emails for every recorded diagnosed >>> event upon system boot, even when those faults have been repaired or >>> resolved long since. We're on r151006. >>> >>> This seems like a bug - is anyone else seeing this? >>> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kevin Swab UNIX Systems Administrator >> ACNS Colorado State University >> Phone: (970)491-6572 Email: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU >> GPG Fingerprint: 7026 3F66 A970 67BD 6F17 8EB8 8A7D 142F 2392 791C >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From zmalone at omniti.com Fri Jan 31 16:29:26 2014 From: zmalone at omniti.com (Zach Malone) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:29:26 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [OmniOS] Two problem for set a zfs dataset in a zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, I don't have much experience with delegating a zfs volume instead of just a data set to a zone, but I believe the "add dataset" method you've used second probably won't work, as that's how you add a regular zfs filesystem. http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/2013-January/000413.html sounds like exactly the same issue though. Going back to the last time I needed a zvol inside a zone, I think I might have tried creating the zvol on a dataset that had been delegated to the zone already, and mounted/delegated the parent dataset to the zone normally. The dataset would have then been created by the zone, rather then the gz. --Zach Malone On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Fr?d?ric Alix wrote: > Hello :) > > I have two problem for use a zfs dataset in a zone. > > First, i would like use it as a device > > zfs create -V5g rpool/data0 > In zonecfg: > add device > set match = "/dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/data0" > end > > I boot the zone, and the device don't appear. > I read this, but it not resolve the problem > http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/2013-February/000479.html > > After, i try to use it lie this: > add dataset > set name = rpool/data0 > end > > and when i want boot the zone: > root at box:/var/tmp# zoneadm -z nappit0 boot > zone 'nappit0': cannot open ZFS dataset 'rpool/data0' > zoneadm: zone 'nappit0': call to zoneadmd failed > > But my dataset exist > root at box:/var/tmp# zfs list rpool/data0 > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > rpool/data0 5,16G 33,2G 16K - > > > > Can you help me please ? > > Regards, Fr?d?ric > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > From zmalone at omniti.com Fri Jan 31 16:37:12 2014 From: zmalone at omniti.com (Zach Malone) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:37:12 -0500 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] create ordinary user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: What package repo did you install Netatalk from, or did you compile it yourself? Which utility is missing? On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:18 AM, F?bio Rabelo wrote: > Hi to all > > I am trying netatalk in an OminOS box, and having problem to create a user ... > > All and every how-to that I found in the web refers to an utilitary in > command line from OpenSolaris, but this tool do not exist in OmniOS > ... > > So, how can I create an ordinary user to authenticate against netatalk ? > > Thanks in advance ... > > > F?bio Rabelo > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br Fri Jan 31 16:44:36 2014 From: fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br (=?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A1bio_Rabelo?=) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:44:36 -0200 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] create ordinary user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Using the repo http://scott.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/ wget -O - www.napp-it.org/afp | perl Nothing wrong here, but there are no ordinary user on the system, just the root ... F?bio Rabelo 2014-01-31 Zach Malone : > What package repo did you install Netatalk from, or did you compile it > yourself? Which utility is missing? > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:18 AM, F?bio Rabelo wrote: >> Hi to all >> >> I am trying netatalk in an OminOS box, and having problem to create a user ... >> >> All and every how-to that I found in the web refers to an utilitary in >> command line from OpenSolaris, but this tool do not exist in OmniOS >> ... >> >> So, how can I create an ordinary user to authenticate against netatalk ? >> >> Thanks in advance ... >> >> >> F?bio Rabelo >> _______________________________________________ >> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss From jimklimov at cos.ru Fri Jan 31 17:09:23 2014 From: jimklimov at cos.ru (Jim Klimov) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:09:23 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] [OmniOS] Two problem for set a zfs dataset in a zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52EBD8C3.3050304@cos.ru> On 2014-01-31 01:35, Fr?d?ric Alix wrote: > Hello :) > > I have two problem for use a zfs dataset in a zone. > > First, i would like use it as a device > > zfs create -V5g rpool/data0 > In zonecfg: > add device > set match = "/dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/data0" > end > > I boot the zone, and the device don't appear. I do have a similar setup on one box, albeit on a SPARC Solaris 10 for a Solaris 8 branded zone (evacuation of an older server to newer hardware), and the zone manifest (/etc/zones/zonename.xml) contains: The volume has no special properties set: # zfs list -r pool/zones/local/colonel-data NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool/zones/local/colonel-data 1.25G 16.1G 31.4K /zones/local/colonel-data pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 1.25G 16.4G 331M - zfs get all pool/zones/local/colonel-data/infx-chunk1 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 type volume - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 creation Mon Nov 25 8:32 2013 - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 used 1.25G - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 available 16.4G - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 referenced 331M - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 compressratio 4.92x - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 reservation none default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 volsize 2.05G - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 volblocksize 8K - pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 checksum on default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 compression gzip-9 inherited from pool/zones/local pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 readonly off default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 shareiscsi off default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 copies 1 default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 refreservation 300M local pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 primarycache all default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 secondarycache all default pool/zones/local/colonel-data/chunk1 com.sun:auto-snapshot true inherited from pool In particular, the "zoned" property is "off" on both the volume and its higher containers. This setup works, despite the fact that the branded Solaris 8 image has of course no direct support for ZFS, so delegation of datasets was not an option (either devices, or lofs-mounts, from the GZ into LZ should have worked and did in fact work). Now, this is indeed a different OS, but the basics like this should be the same. Try starting "zlogin -C zonename" before booting the zone, this may log something about some errors that may be in the way? HTH, //Jim From Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU Fri Jan 31 17:54:32 2014 From: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU (Kevin Swab) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:54:32 -0700 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Migrating from OpenIndiana In-Reply-To: <00e3cde8-116d-4da5-857c-f24a0883afbe@careyweb.com> References: <00e3cde8-116d-4da5-857c-f24a0883afbe@careyweb.com> Message-ID: <52EBE358.1060602@ColoState.EDU> We recently did this on 18 of our storage servers, and the process went smoothly, no issues were encountered. Our setup sounds similar to yours: The OI 151a7 systems were serving LUNs over FC via Comstar. The root pools were mirrored, and each system had at least one other pool for data (zvols backing the Comstar LUNs). I set up a Kayak server which makes the install process go much faster (and minimizes downtime), but it's not necessary to get the job done. The steps we followed were something like this: - Save the Comstar config: svccfg export -a stmf > svccfg-stmf.xml I put the XML file in one of the data pools so it would be easy to access from the new OmniOS install. - save any other files you care about from the root pool - break off one of the mirrored root pool devices to use for the OmniOS install - Install OmniOS onto the free device and boot. - Import the data pools. I didn't export them from the old OI install first, so '-f' was needed on the 'zpool import' command - Restore the Comstar config: svccfg import svccfg-stmf.xml At this point you should be up and running on your OmniOS install, with the old OpenIndiana install still available on the other root pool disk. Once you feel confident things are working and you don't need to fall back to the old OS, remirror the root pool and upgrade the data pools. The total time the systems were unavailable for the upgrade was about 10-15 minutes. Did I mention Kayak was fast? :-) Good luck with your upgrades, Kevin On 01/29/2014 02:59 PM, Nate Smith wrote: > I?m going to migrate the ZFS systems on my OpenIndiana file server to an > Omnios based one for greater stability (my Openindiana server seems to > lose all network connectivity about once every three months, though all > the FC targets stay mounted and accessible). I am running oi_151a7, with > version 28 ZFS volumes. They are presented as block storage Comstar > targets over fibre channel. Should I have any problems migrating these > to Omnios? Thanks in advance. > > > > -Nate > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Swab UNIX Systems Administrator ACNS Colorado State University Phone: (970)491-6572 Email: Kevin.Swab at ColoState.EDU GPG Fingerprint: 7026 3F66 A970 67BD 6F17 8EB8 8A7D 142F 2392 791C From alka at hfg-gmuend.de Fri Jan 31 19:22:46 2014 From: alka at hfg-gmuend.de (alka) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:22:46 +0100 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] create ordinary user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8ED539DC-5DE6-4257-8741-922173E2924B@hfg-gmuend.de> Netatalk use regular OmniOS Unix users. If you use napp-it, goto menu user and klick ++add local user You can also use the CLI command useradd Gea Am 31.01.2014 um 17:44 schrieb F?bio Rabelo: > Using the repo http://scott.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/ > wget -O - www.napp-it.org/afp | perl > > Nothing wrong here, but there are no ordinary user on the system, just > the root ... > > > F?bio Rabelo > > 2014-01-31 Zach Malone : >> What package repo did you install Netatalk from, or did you compile it >> yourself? Which utility is missing? >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:18 AM, F?bio Rabelo wrote: >>> Hi to all >>> >>> I am trying netatalk in an OminOS box, and having problem to create a user ... >>> >>> All and every how-to that I found in the web refers to an utilitary in >>> command line from OpenSolaris, but this tool do not exist in OmniOS >>> ... >>> >>> So, how can I create an ordinary user to authenticate against netatalk ? >>> >>> Thanks in advance ... >>> >>> >>> F?bio Rabelo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OmniOS-discuss mailing list >>> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com >>> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anhquach at me.com Fri Jan 31 23:07:38 2014 From: anhquach at me.com (Anh Quach) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:07:38 -0800 Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] SMB + Network tuning Message-ID: Hi all, new to the list.. apologies if this is a tired topic..? I?m seeing poor SMB performance on my gigabit network here, as compared to a Synology filer. With the Synology, my test client can read/write consistently at near line speeds (100MB/s+), while with the OmniOS test filer, I can?t seem to get above 60MB/s.? I?ve tried the usual TCP tuning of buffers, ack, and such, to no avail. NFS seems to yield about the same results.? Some details:? - Server: HP Proliant, DL360 G5, 16GB RAM - OS: tested with both latest OmniOS + Solaris 11.1, with and without Napp-it, same results - NIC: bnx? - storage: Xyratex JBOD, SAS - zpool: 2 x 6 disk raidz2 I?m getting hundreds of MB/s off the zpool, so I?m thinking the bottleneck has to be something in the Samba or NIC driver config.? Any ideas greatly appreciated! ? --? Anh Quach Sent with Airmail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: