[OmniOS-discuss] zfs diskusage
Dan McDonald
danmcd at omniti.com
Thu May 15 15:08:59 UTC 2014
On May 15, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Tobias Oetiker <tobi at oetiker.ch> wrote:
> Today we were out of diskspace on one of our pools ... a few removed
> snapshots later all is fine, except that I find that I don't realy
> understand the numbers ... can anyone elighten me?
>
> # zpool list fast
> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
> fast 4.34T 1.74T 2.61T - 39% 1.22x ONLINE -
>
> # zfs list fast
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> fast 2.59T 716G 78.5K /fast
>
> Why does the 'zpool list' claim that 2.61T is free (61%)
> while 'zfs list' sees 716G free (27%)
>
> I know there is raidz2 and compression so the numbers don't match
> up, but I don't understand why the ratio is so different between
> the two.
Richard Elling addressed something similar on a different thread:
http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/2014-May/002609.html
You're running raidz2, and that's likely why you're seeing the discrepency between zpool and zfs.
Try Richard's advice of running "zfs list -o space" for the breakdown.
Dan
More information about the OmniOS-discuss
mailing list