[OmniOS-discuss] Clues for tracking down a drastic ZFS fs space difference?
Paul B. Henson
henson at acm.org
Wed Apr 29 21:32:46 UTC 2015
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:23:27PM -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> (On the other hand, maybe 'deferred free' is not blocks that are going
> to be freed but instead blocks serving as indexes to etc, in which case
> this might be a significant number. I don't have data from anything
> else to cross-check against.)
Not sure; you could ask on the zfs developer list, but their first
response will probably be to update to a more current system :).
Here's zdb output from one of my production pools that's not
misbehaving. It's a backup for another box so it pretty much gets zfs
recv all day and it has async destroy enabled:
Blocks LSIZE PSIZE ASIZE avg comp %Total Type
4.55K 60.9M 30.1M 90.3M 19.8K 2.02 0.39 deferred free
FWIW :).
More information about the OmniOS-discuss
mailing list