[OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 12:48:36 -0400
Dan McDonald <danmcd at omniti.com> wrote:

> 
> I see pros & cons of both approaches.  I'm visiting OmniTI HQ in a week to, among other things, bounce ideas around with OmniTI folks - since they are also my customers.  Feel free to speak up here if you have opinions as well.
> 
I vote for a combination of both approaches for the following main
reasons:

Approach 1)
- All network configuration can be done outside the zone giving the
  opportunity to hand out LX zones to users with a locked down network
  configuration.
- Admins can script everything and have total control of LX zones

Approach 2)
- This way favors in-house or friendly environment usecases where
  distributed responsibility is desired.
- Greater flexibility for LX zone users

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
  I'm not going to say, "I told you so."

----

This mail was virus scanned and spam checked before delivery.
This mail is also DKIM signed. See header dkim-signature.