[OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS and OpenMP
Paul B. Henson
henson at acm.org
Tue Jan 5 01:00:55 UTC 2016
Ah, bloating the total package count vs bloating the default installed file system, decisions, decisions :).
I think on this one I'd vote for a separate package.
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Dan McDonald <danmcd at omniti.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
>>
>> While OmniOS observes a 'KYSTY' philosophy, the default created OmniOS zone size still seems rather large.
>
> That can get fixed once we reform "entire". I was thinking that if it didn't get included in gcc-5-runtime it'd NOT be in "entire".
>
>> Avoiding expanding this size should be part of the decision criteria. Other than that, including it in gcc-5-runtime would make things easier for packagers and avoid additional moving parts.
>
> And you've illuminated why it's not an obvious decision. Hence my putting the question out here.
>
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> OmniOS-discuss mailing list
> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com
> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
More information about the OmniOS-discuss
mailing list