[OmniOS-discuss] bareos instead of bacula
Michael Rasmussen
mir at miras.org
Sat Jun 18 21:25:59 UTC 2016
Hi all,
I am wondering why omniti-ms contains bacula and not bareos. bacula OSS
version seems more or less to be abandoned while bareos is actively
maintained.
So why not replace bacula with bareos?
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
An editor is one who separates the wheat from the chaff and prints the
chaff. -- Adlai Stevenson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://omniosce.org/ml-archive/attachments/20160618/1d1ad171/attachment.bin>
More information about the OmniOS-discuss
mailing list