[OmniOS-discuss] On pkg(1) behavior in r151022
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us
Mon Feb 20 22:46:14 UTC 2017
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dan McDonald wrote:
>
> Because of the least-suprise violation of new "pkg update" behavior,
> I'm wondering if we should make "-r" implicit. I'm working right
> now on an implicit "-r" solution, but am running into some problems
> with the pkg5 test suite I still need to sort out.
I like the new behavior because it provides an option which previously
did not exist. It would be cleaner if 'update' also used -r.
The documentation says that the linked zones are updated as required
such that they still work.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
More information about the OmniOS-discuss
mailing list