[OmniOS-discuss] Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit not working since upgrade to r151020

[Richard Skelton]

Hi,
The SFP+ is a Cisco P/N 10-3105-01 is just not supported because it's
not an Intel part :-)

Richard Skelton wrote:
> Hi,
> After setting the allow_unsupported_sfp = 1;
> I now see :-
>
> Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp:
> pciex8086,10fb (ixgbe) instance 0 irq 0x43 vector 0x64 ioapic 0xff
> intin 0xff is bound to cpu 6
> Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp:
> pciex8086,10fb (ixgbe) instance 0 irq 0x44 vector 0x65 ioapic 0xff
> intin 0xff is bound to cpu 7
> Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device:
> devinfo0
> Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] devinfo0 is
> /pseudo/devinfo at 0
> Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost ixgbe: [ID 398243 kern.notice] NOTICE: WARNING:
> Intel (R) Network Connections are quality tested using Intel (R)
> Ethernet Optics. Using untested modules is not supported and may cause
> unstable operation or damage to the module or the adapter. Intel
> Corporation is not responsible for any harm caused by using untested
> modules.
> Nov 28 20:59:47 myhost mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0
> registered
> Nov 28 20:59:47 myhost ixgbe: [ID 611667 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0:
> Intel 10Gb Ethernet
> Nov 28 20:59:49 myhost mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0 link
> up, 10000 Mbps, full duplex
>
> I think the SFP+ are made by Cisco will get the P/N tomorrow
>
> What SFP+ P/N should I use?
>
> Dan McDonald wrote:
>> Literally separate things with a space, AND end it with a semicolon:
>>
>> 	allow_unsupported_sfp = 1;
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://omniosce.org/ml-archive/attachments/20161130/e72918ea/attachment.html>