[OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?

[Ludovic Orban]

I personally don't need ipadm in my LX zones, nerver missed it and I'm
pretty certain I wouldn't use it even if it was available. I'd *much*
prefer to have 7388 though (sorry for insisting, I couldn't resist ;-))

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Guenther Alka <alka at hfg-gmuend.de> wrote:

> Setting ip properties atthe virtualisation layer
> seems not straight forward to me. Lately I was
> asked about the problem where DNS onUbuntu 16
> was not working despite the setting in the zone.cfg
> (Configurating /etc/resolv in Linux was needed)
>
> I would prefer a more ESXi like behaviour where settings
> about hardware like (lofi) disks, CPU, RAM, vnics are zone
> settings while network configuration is done by the VM
> itself with the different but regular Linux tools and ways.
>
> A related question
> Exclusive ip access over a dedicated vnic is working.
> I had problems with shared/ bridged access to a physical nic
> that is in use by OmniOS itself or a different zone. Is that possible?
>
> And is there a property to limit RAM or CPU of an LX zone?
>
> Gea
>
>
>
> Am 30.03.2017 um 07:30 schrieb Johan Kragsterman:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> -----"OmniOS-discuss" <omnios-discuss-bounces at lists.omniti.com> skrev:
>> -----
>> Till: OmniOS-discuss <omnios-discuss at lists.omniti.com>
>> Från: Dan McDonald
>> Sänt av: "OmniOS-discuss"
>> Datum: 2017-03-30 02:12
>> Ärende: [OmniOS-discuss] LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
>>
>> One of the checkbox-items for this bloody *was* "ipadm for LX zones".
>> After having some conversations with Joyent, and noticing a lack of
>> enthusiasm here, I'm wondering if I should even bother with it for this
>> bloody & r151022.
>>
>> Please speak up if you have ANY opinion on this subject.  I'm honestly
>> not sure, so I wouldn't be taking sides or advocating one way or the other.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> ipadm is a nice and versatile tool, and I would for sure like to see it
>> in LX zones. Though the priority of the development is another question,
>> WHEN to put it there.
>> r151022 is an LTS release, and I believe it would be nice to have ipadm
>> in there, but if you can't get it there before release, due to other
>> priorities, perhaps you can backport it later?
>>
>> Rgrds Johan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OmniOS-discuss mailing list
> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com
> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://omniosce.org/ml-archive/attachments/20170330/ce9d7616/attachment.html>